Eustigmaeus brevivestitus, Mierski, Andrzej Ka Ż & Czyk, Justyna Do Ñ, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157100 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6277054 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C887B5-FFF1-FF82-5432-FD3EFCBBFA72 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eustigmaeus brevivestitus |
status |
sp. nov. |
2. Eustigmaeus brevivestitus sp. n. ( Figs 817 View FIGURES 8 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURES 11 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURES 14 15 View FIGURES 16 17 )
Locus typicus. North Poland. Tczew province. Gniew city. Xerothermic lawn on the slope of Vistula River Valley (Notation: “JUDO 10 A...G”).
This place has been traced on high edge of Vistula River Valley, strongly exposited to the sun, with xerothermic plants. In wealthy composition of plant species the most often noticed are: Arrenathemum elatius, Bronnis inermis, Avenastrum pubescens, Vicia tenuifolia, Carduus acanthoides, Anthemis tinctoria, Falcaria vulgaris, Centaurea scabiosa. From the group of pretty interesting (=relatively rare) plant species should be mentioned: Ononius spinosa, Eryngium planum and Lathyrus tuberosus . The presence of ruderal plants as Echium vulgare, Cichorium intybus and Medicago x varia is connected with neighbourhood of the city.
Sampled material: dry soil from beneath of plants, also leaves and stalks of varying plants.
Specimens. Holotype: female, slide N° 10E / P9 (coll. date: 0 5 Mar. 2000). Allotype: male, 10D / P5 (30 Dec. 1999). Paratypes: female, 10D / P7 (30 Dec. 1999), female, 10E / P14 (05 Mar. 2000), deutonymph, 10G / P7 (03 Jul. 2000) and larva, 10D / P16 (30 Dec. 1999).
Type repository. Holotype is deposited in ZMH. Allotype and paratypes are deposited in DAM.
Etymology. The Latin word “ brevivestitus ” means “shortly covered”.
General character. The species of “ segnis ” group: sabreshaped dorsal setae, one pair of aggenitals (ag), genu II with three setae (famulus k absent).
Description of holotype, female (slide No 10E / P9).
Idiosoma. Short and relatively flat, broadlypyriform in dorsal or ventral view ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8 9 ). Length: 255, maximal width: 220 (For comparison: female paratype 1 from slide 10D/P7: 258 227). Shields: P, (H), HY, SA. Shield ornamentation: reticulation without prominent „craters” and alveoli. Shield HY only slightly extends on the both sides of body. Eyes not large, located between setae be and ce ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8 9 ). Dorsal setae relatively long and narrow, flat, sabreshaped, with rather delicate but visible serration ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8 9 ). Lengths: ae (strongly bent) 60, be 60, ce 50, de 53, he 57, a 58, b 58, c 60, la 60, li 64, lm 64, e 40, le 32. Ventrum striated ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ) with exception of nude intercoxal regions. Three pairs of intercoxal setae occur (1a, 3a, 4a). Lack of coalesced sternal shields (SP and SM). Genital chaetotaxy: (3 1). Setae ge situated on nude genital plates. Setae ag lie on striated cuticle ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11 12 ).
Gnathosoma . Visible from above. Bases of chelicerae thick. Stylet of 30 in length. Palps strong, stout and long ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11 12 ). Tibial claw thick, subtly narrowed at the tip, which is somewhat blunt and turned down. Additional, smaller, straight and bidentate claw (=thorn) is seting at the base of main claw. Palpal tarsus (=“thumb”) almost equal in length with claw, twice as long as broad. It is provided with five nude setae, proximal solenidium
and terminal trifurcate eupathidium (p). The latter is nearly as long as its segment. Palpal femurogenu with two dorsal serrate setae and the third one, which is ventral, shorter and smooth. Palptrochanter with dorsallolateral sharp thorn seting on rounded „hillock”. Summing palpal pattern is: [1 3 4+claw with thorn 5+(p)+].
Legs. Stout and relatively long in comparison with many other Eustigmaeus species. Chaetotaxy: I (2 1 5 4 5+ p + ’’ 13+), II (2 1 4 3 6 8+), III (2 2 3 1 6 7+), IV (2 1 2 1 6 6+). Apotele with two claws and empodium in shape of dumpy stem with three „Y”shaped chetoids (= rylets). Rylets are long and slender, with each branch forked on its very end. Detailed organotaxy of leg I ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 ) from trochanter to tarsus: trochanter trv (nude); femur bfl’’ (nude), tfl’, tfl’’ (both nude), tfd’, tfd’’ (both strongly serrated); genu l’, l’’, d’, d’’ (all four strongly serrated); tibia v’, v’’ (both nude), l’ (serrate), l’’ (nude), d (strongly serrated), sharply ended solenidiae p and ’’. Solenidium ’’ shorter and less developed than proximal p. Tarsus three pairs of eupathidials: (ft), (tc), (p), three pairs of remaining setae: (pl), (at), (u), single seta vs and solenidium I, which is long, bent and rounded distally. All tarsal setae are nude. Proximallodorsal setae on tibiae II, III and IV are distinctly shorter, acciculate and based on rounded convexities (= hillocks”) as in E. segnis . Second seta on trochanter III very slender.
Male. Length: 264, width: 183. Shields and chaetotaxy like in female. However, all four pairs of tarsi provised in imposing, additional males solenidions m, which are based proximally, in dorsoadaxial position ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14 15 ). In genital region well visible aedagus occurs ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14 15 ).
Deutonymph. Length: 242. width: 170. Similar to female with exception of underdeveloped genital region: lack of internal sclerites and presence of three pairs of setae only (lack of ag) are characteristic for this stase.
Larva. The body rounded and dumpy ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 17 ). Length: 140, width: 130. Fourth pair of legs missing. Small, paired anogenital plate with three pairs of minute setae occurs. No coalesced dorsal opisthosomal shield HY, which is divided into central M (medial), posterior MLZ (mediozonal), and two lateral L. Medial shield embraces setae a and b, while mediozonal one embraces setae c, d and lm. Shields H lie lateroventrally, shield SA lies ventrally. Summing larval pattern of shields is: P, (H), M, (L), MLZ and SA. Phanerotaxy patterns for the legs from coxae to tarsi are as follow: I (2 0 4 3 5+ p 13+), II (0 0 3 2 5+1 8+), III (0 0 3 0 5+1 7+). Tibiae I without ’’, while p is well developed and strongly bent. Seta d on tibia I serrated. Seta l’ on tibia I slightly serrated. Tectals on tarsus I unequal in length ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16 17 ). Coxa I with dorsal seta cxd in shape of short thorn based on thumblike processus on very base of segment. Similar organ (trd) occurs in palptrochanter ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 17 ). Each tibia II and III with five normal and one minute seta.
Differentiating diagnosis. The new species is highly specific by some features, although it can be compared with Eustigmaeus segnis ( Koch, 1836) . Both species are similar by following combination of keycharacters (excluding common features typical for “ segnis ” group):
Setae a longer than the distance of a b.
Ends of setae b reach the bases of setae c.
Setae li longer than the distance li li.
Setae c situated dorsally.
All dorsal setae serrated.
The differences are as follow:
Dimensions. Body length of females: 250260 (length of E. segnis : ca 300 m).
Idiosoma more flat.
Shield HY only slightly extends on the sides of body in opposity to HY in E. segnis ,
which is extending to the ventrum.
Fused sternal shields SP and SM absent (present in E. segnis ).
“Craters” without cavities (= alveolae), which are characteristic for E. segnis .
Length of setae b equal to b c distance (in E. segnis b distinctly longer than b c).
Femur II with four setae (in E. segnis five).
ZMH |
Zoologisches Museum Hamburg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |