Erythrina compacta hort. ex W.Bull, Cat. New Beautiful Rare Pl.: 4. 1871, nom. nud.; Carriere and Andre , Rev. Hortic.: 348. 1882, nom. nud.
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.232.101105 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E15F47D5-E796-508B-A665-D90E892AE944 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Erythrina compacta hort. ex W.Bull, Cat. New Beautiful Rare Pl.: 4. 1871, nom. nud.; Carriere and Andre , Rev. Hortic.: 348. 1882, nom. nud. |
status |
|
8. Erythrina compacta hort. ex W.Bull, Cat. New Beautiful Rare Pl.: 4. 1871, nom. nud.; Carriere and Andre, Rev. Hortic.: 348. 1882, nom. nud. View in CoL
≡ Erythrina compacta W.Bull ex K.Koch, Wochenschr. Vereines Beförd. Gartenbaues Konigl. Preuss. Staaten 14(20): 159. 1871, nom. nud.
Notes.
Bull (1871) briefly described the aesthetic characteristics of a cultivated plant named E. compacta by horticulturists. Later in the same year, Koch (1871) mentioned the specimen cited by Bull, but only repeated his description. It was later also described by Carrière and André (1882), who observed that the specimen was just a more compact cultivated variety of E. crista-galli . According to Article 38 of the ICN ( Turland et al. 2018), a name cannot be effectively published using a description of purely aesthetic features, which is the case for all three publications related to this name, thus all of them are excluded here as nomen nudum.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |