Elmohardyia limeirai, Marques, Dayse W. A. & Rafael, José A., 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3972.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D524C44A-6CAF-41B5-9461-89CF3C63DB1B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6118790 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4F7E878E-2961-FFC2-6BDD-FE18E579E32A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Elmohardyia limeirai |
status |
sp. nov. |
Elmohardyia limeirai View in CoL sp.nov.
Figs 80–96 View FIGURES 80 – 96
Diagnosis. Tergite 2 almost entirely gray pruinose. Sternite 6 with two subapical protuberances. Surstyli asymmetrical. Left surstylus slightly longer than right surstylus, strongly curved inward, with basal lobe. Left gonopod not developed. Apex of phallic guide with two additional processes, one being bifid.
Description of male holotype. ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ). Body length 4.2 mm. Head. Eyes contiguous for a distance of sixteen facets. F, EM, V = 0.4 mm, 0.4 mm, 0.3 mm. Frontal triangle and face gray pruinose. Postcranium dark, gray-brown pruinose dorsally and gray pruinose laterally and ventrally. Antennae ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ) with scape dark brown; pedicel dark brown, with three dorsal and two ventral bristles; postpedicel dark yellow to brown on basal one third, remaining yellow. LPP/WPP = 2. Labellum dark yellow. Thorax. Postpronotal lobe brown, gray pruinose. Scutum dark brown to black, brown pruinose. Notopleuron dark brown, gray pruinose with eight weak bristles. Scutellum dark brown to black, gray pruinose, with inconspicuous bristles. Mesopleuron and mediotergite dark brown, gray pruinose. Wing. ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ). Length 4.4 mm. LW/MWW = 3.4. LTC/LFC = 1.2. Membrane somewhat hyaline; almost entirely covered with microtrichia, except for cells bc, basal two thirds of c, basal three quarters of sc, basal two thirds of r1, small basal area of r2+3 and r4+5, br, bm, small basal area of cup and basal one third of anal lobe without or with very sparse microtrichia. Vein r-m placed just before basal third of cell dm. Vein dm-cu straight. Halter brown with middle part of stem yellow. Legs. ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ). Coxae dark brown, gray pruinose. Trochanters yellow. Femora brown with base and apex yellow, entirely gray pruinose posteriorly. Tibiae dark yellow to brown, gray pruinose. Tarsi dark yellow to brown, except fifth tarsomere darker. Pulvilli yellow. Abdomen. ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ). Dark brown to black, gray pruinose on tergite 1, almost entirely on tergite 2, except for a large band of brown pruinosity posteromedially, and only on posterolateral spots on tergites 3–5; tergite 1 with two stout black bristles laterally. Tergite 6 and sternites 6, 7 as in Fig. 84 View FIGURES 80 – 96 . Sternite 6 ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ) with two subapical protuberances, the left one stouter. Syntergosternite 8 dark brown to black, as long as tergite 5, brown pruinose anteriorly, gray pruinose laterally and posteriorly ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ) and with membranous area longer than wide, subrectangular ( Fig. 86 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ). Terminalia. Epandrium and surstyli yellow ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ). Surstyli ( Figs 87–88 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ) asymmetrical. Left surstylus slightly longer than right surstylus, strongly curved inward, with basal lobe ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ); lateral view as in Fig. 89 View FIGURES 80 – 96 . Right surstylus with base larger than apex ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ); with acute apex when seen in lateral view ( Fig. 90 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ). Subepandrial sclerite as in Fig. 91 View FIGURES 80 – 96 . Right gonopod with acute apex; left gonopod not developed ( Fig. 92 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ). Phallic guide ( Figs 93– 95 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ) with two additional processes, lateral one bifid; dorsal view as in Fig. 95 View FIGURES 80 – 96 . Phallus with small subapical spicule ( Fig. 93 View FIGURES 80 – 96 ). Ejaculatory apodeme as in Fig. 96 View FIGURES 80 – 96 . Female unknown.
Variations (n = 5). Body length 3.8–4.2 mm. (one paratype headless and three specimens were not measured prior to dissection). Wing length 4.1–4.5 mm.
Type Material. HOLOTYPE ♂: “ BRASIL, MA[ranhão], Carolina, PAR[que]NA[cional] Chapada das Mesas, Riacho Sucuruiu, 240 m, 07°07'05.6"S, 47°18'31.6"W ” “Armadilha de Malaise, 01–10.xi.2013, J.A. Rafael, F. Limeira-de-Oliveira & T.T.A. Silva cols [collectors]” “ Holotype ♂, Elmohardyia limeirai Marques & Rafael ” ( CZMA). PARATYPES: idem, 01–15.vii.2013 (1♂ INPA); idem, 15–31.vii.2013 (1♂ CZMA); idem, 20– 31.viii.2013 (1♂ CZMA); idem, Mirador, Parque Est. Mirador, Base da Geraldina, Armadilha Malaise, 27.viii.2006, F. Limeira-de-Oliveira (2♂ CZMA); idem, 23–28.ix.2006 (1♂ CZMA); idem, Armadilha Luminosa, 22.ii–01.iii.2009, M.B. Aguiar-Neto & M.J.A. Holanda cols. (1♂ CZMA); idem, Armadilha Malaise, 13– 19.x.2012, F. Limeira-de-Oliveira, L.L.M. Santos & L.S. Santos (1♂ INPA); idem, 10–16.v.2013 (1♂ INPA).
Holotype condition. Left wing detached, mounted on microslide. Left postpedicel glued on the specimen triangle card. Terminalia placed in microvial with glycerin.
Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronym honoring Francisco Limeira de Oliveira, curator of CZMA, from Universidade Estadual do Maranhão.
Distribution. Brazil: Maranhão (Cerrado Biome).
Discussion. Elmohardyia limeirai sp. nov. is close to E. potiguar sp. nov., due to the left surstylus with apex curved inward, sternite 6 with two subapical protuberances, membranous area longer than wide, and phallic guide with two additional processes. Elmohardyia limeirai sp. nov. differs from E. potiguar sp. nov. by the thinner distal half of the left surstylus (broader in E. potiguar sp. nov.), right surstylus with base wider than apex (almost equally wide in E. potiguar sp. nov.), and left gonopod not developed (short but distinct in E. potiguar sp. nov.).
INPA |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |