Ellesmeroceras sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.01103.2023 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C02D87A3-F14D-FFB5-D14F-72C1FD2587CC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ellesmeroceras sp. |
status |
|
Fig. 8A View Fig .
Material.— CEGH-UNC 27496 b from the Alfarcito Member , Santa Rosita Formation , early Tremadocian , Lower Ordovician , Quebrada de Arenal, Trancas section, Jujuy, Argentina .
Description.—The specimen consists of a small, slightly cyrtoconic, endogastric fragment of phragmocone of ca. 20 mm long and lacking the apical portion. It is 4 mm in diameter at the adoral end and 2.5 mm in diameter adapically ( Fig. 8A View Fig ). It is estimated that the complete conch could easily reach 30 mm in length. The chambers are short, ranging from 0.4 to 0.6 mm, with an RCL of 0.12 or eight chambers within a distance equivalent to the maximum diameter. The sutures are sinuous ( Fig. 8A View Fig 1 View Fig , A 2 View Fig ). The siphuncle has a diameter 35% that of the conch diameter at the same point of measurement, is marginal and ventral. The expansion rate is low, with an apical angle of 5.7°. The shell wall is not preserved. In the adoral part of the phragmocone, seems to be an inflexion followed by a slight increase in the expansion rate (see arrow in Fig. 8A View Fig 1 View Fig ). This could be a pathological trait or a diagnostic character, but as we only have the single specimen, it is impossible to evaluate its significance.
Remarks.—Despite the similarities to E. humahuacaensis , the notably larger size of the conch and the sinuosity of the suture line lead us to regard this specimen as a separate taxon. Until other material exhibiting additional characters is available, we prefer to leave this specimen in open nomenclature. Nevertheless, the slightly cyrtoconic, endogastric conch and the very short chambers suggest that it may be assigned to Ellesmeroceras .
Order undetermined
Family Bassleroceratidae Ulrich, Foerste, Miller, and Furnish, 1944
Remarks.—The family Bassleroceratidae has been assigned both to the Ellesmerocerida , the Tarphycerida, and the later assignment of these specimens. Compare with this material, Lawrenceoceras Ulrich, Foerste, Miller, and Furnish, 1944 , has a smaller siphuncle relative to the conch diameter, and it is not completely marginal ( Kröger and Pohle 2021). In Anguloceras the septa slope steeply apicad from the venter to the dorsum ( Unklesbay and Young 1956). In Avaoceras the siphuncle is submarginal ( Ulrich et al. 1944). Hitherto, the oldest reported bassleroceratids were late Tremadocian in age ( Evans 2011). The questionable Bassleroceras from the Balnakeil Formation ( Evans 2011) and the two species of Bassleroceras from the Rochdale Formation ( Kröger and Landing 2008) are both slightly younger than the Argentine specimens described herein. The formers are from the Paltodus deltifer –Macerodus dianae Conodont Zone (which is lower Tr 2). If the presence of the group in the Alfarcito Member of the Cordillera Oriental, Jujuy, is confirmed, it would be one of the oldest records. It is interesting to note that similar forms, but yet undescribed, appear to occur in the earliest Tremadocian of Australia (AP unpublished data).
The age of the specimens further highlights the problematic state of ellesmerocerid taxonomy, as it is also difficult to differentiate between bassleroceratids and certain late Cambrian ellesmerocerids such as the Huaiheceratidae and the Xiaoshanoceratidae , which apparently also had an exogastric conch. The Xiaoshanoceratidae supposedly have a depressed cross-section, while the only character distinguishing the Huaiheceratidae from the Bassleroceratidae is the thinner connecting ring of the former. In our opinion, these characteristics are questionable, because the xiaoshanoceratids are only known from randomly oriented cross-sections ( Chen and Teichert 1983a) and a depressed cross-section may also be produced by an oblique cut, meanwhile the connecting rings are frequently missed and/or altered during diagenesis.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.