Echiniscus tropicalis Binda & Pilato, 1995
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.5.59997 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22050C34-40A5-4B7A-9969-222AE927D6AA |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/09753633-B888-5EDD-935E-95917543712F |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Echiniscus tropicalis Binda & Pilato, 1995 |
status |
|
Echiniscus tropicalis Binda & Pilato, 1995 Figures 8 View Figure 8 , 9 View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 , 11 View Figure 11 , Tables 6, 7, 8
Material.
Together 402 adult females, 17 juveniles and 10 larvae mounted on slides.
Description.
Mature females (i.e. from the third instar onwards; measurements in Table 6 View Table 6 ). Body small and plump (Figs 9A View Figure 9 , 11A View Figure 11 ), yellow to orange, with minute red eyes absent after mounting. Ordinary primary and secondary (cephalic papillae) clavae of the Echiniscus -type; peribuccal cirri with well-developed cirrophores. Cirrus A very short (<25% of the body length), with cirrophore. Body appendage configuration A - B - C - Cd - D - Dd - E, with all appendages developed as spines or spicules, which are smooth or only sometimes spines E are serrated (Figs 9A View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 , 11A View Figure 11 ). Asymmetries frequent, especially in the lateral positions.
Dorsal plates strongly sclerotised and well-demarcated from each other, with the Echiniscus spinulosus type sculpturing, i.e. only pores are present (Figs 9A View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 , 11 View Figure 11 ). Pores are densely arranged and rather of uniform size. Dark endocuticular rings absent (Figs 10 View Figure 10 , 11B, C View Figure 11 ). The cephalic plate consists of two halves, with an anterior chalice-like incision. The cervical (neck) plate is in the form of a narrow grey belt, weakly delineated anterior to the scapular plate (Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ). The scapular plate non-facetted, with the usual lateral sutures delineating small rectangular portions (Figs 9A View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 ). Three median plates: m1, m3 unipartite, the latter reduced to a narrow stripe; m2 bipartite (Figs 9A View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 , 11 View Figure 11 ). Two pairs of large segmental plates, their narrower anterior portions with two thin belts devoid of sculpture (Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ). The caudal (terminal) plate with evident incisions (Figs 9A View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 ) and may be facetted (Fig. 11A View Figure 11 ).
Ventral cuticle smooth or with densely arranged endocuticular pillars. Sexpartite gonopore located anteriorly of legs IV and a trilobed anus between legs IV. Pedal plates and pulvini present (Fig. 9A View Figure 9 ). Spine I thin and minute (Fig. 9A View Figure 9 ). Dentate collar IV composed of numerous acute teeth (Figs 9A View Figure 9 , 11A View Figure 11 ). Papilla on leg IV present (Fig. 9A View Figure 9 ). Claws IV slightly higher than claws I-III. External claws on all legs smooth. Internal claws with heteromorphic spurs positioned at ca. 1/4-1/3 of the claw height.
Mature males. Absent.
Juveniles (i.e. from the second instar onwards; measurements in Table 7 View Table 7 ). No morphometric gap or qualitative differences between adult and juvenile females found. Gonopore absent.
Larvae (i.e. the first instar; measurements in Table 8 View Table 8 ). Clear morphometric gap between juveniles and larvae exists (compare Tables 7 View Table 7 , 8 View Table 8 ). Body appendage configuration A - Cd - Dd - E (Fig. 9B View Figure 9 ). Anterior portions of paired segmental plates weakly sclerotised. Gonopore and anus absent.
Eggs. One egg per exuviae was found in few examined exuviae.
DNA sequences and phylogenetic position.
Two haplotypes in all markers were found, corresponding with the populations ID.032 and ID.939: 18S rRNA (MW327546, MW327547), 28S rRNA (MW327542, MW327543), ITS-2 (MW327549, MW327550), with the exception of ITS-1, characterised by one haplotype (MW327551, MW327552). The sister species of E. tropicalis within the Echiniscus spinulosus complex is E. siticulosus (Fig. 8 View Figure 8 ).
Phenotypic differential diagnosis.
Echiniscus tropicalis was originally described based on two adult females ( Binda and Pilato 1995). We compared the newly found Southeast Asian specimens with the microphotographs of the holotype that confirmed our suspicions after reading the description, i.e. the lack of sound morphological discrepancies between the type material from the Seychelles and abundant material from the Malay Archipelago and the Malay Peninsula. The only difference is the serration of spines E that may be well-developed in Asian populations (Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ), whereas this trait was not reported by Binda and Pilato (1995). The original description mentions "primary and secondary points" in the paratype = a potential ramification. As there is a considerable intrapopulation variability regarding this trait, the Seychellois and Asian populations should be ascertained as conspecific unless DNA data from the Seychelles reject this hypothesis.
There is a plethora of differences between adult females of E. insularis sp. nov. and E. tropicalis after the description of the latter was supplemented with new data:
the presence of supernumerary spicules along the margins of dorsal plates and in the caudal incisions (present in E. insularis sp. nov. vs absent in E. tropicalis);
the presence of pedal plates (absent in E. insularis sp. nov. vs present in E. tropicalis);
the relative length of cirrus A (86.1- 106.2 in E. insularis sp. nov. vs 41.1- 79.3 in E. tropicalis);
the absolute lengths of lateral spines B- D (B 2.5-3.2 μm, C 2.0-5.2 μm, D 2.5-4.0 μm in E. insularis sp. nov. vs B 4.3-12.7 μm, C 6.5-14.7 μm, D 5.7-13.8 μm in E. tropicalis);
the presence of males (present in E. insularis sp. nov. vs absent in E. tropicalis);
additionally, the spine E is frequently serrated in E. tropicalis (smooth in E. insularis sp. nov.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |