Disperis secunda subsp. aemula, (Schltr.) J. C. Manning
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5186519 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D987CB-5E14-FFE0-1A76-52EFFC5CF901 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Disperis secunda subsp. aemula |
status |
|
subsp. aemula (Schltr.) J.C. Manning
S. African J. Bot. 56: 495 (1990); J.C. Manning in H.P. Linder F Kurzweil, Orch. S. Afr.: 316 (1999). — D. secunda (Thunb.) Sw. var. aemula Schltr., Bull. Herb. Boissier , ser. 1, 6: 923 (1898). — D. circumflexa (L.) T.Durand F Schinz var. aemula (Schltr.) Kraenzl., Orch. Gen. Sp. : 826 (1900); J.L. Stewart et al., Wild Orch. S. Afr.: 201 (1982). — Type: South Africa, Cape of Good Hope, Penther s.n. (syn-, xB†); South Africa, Krook s.n. (syn-, xB†); South Africa, Olifantrivierberge, Schlechter s.n. (syn-, xB†).
Differs from the typical subspecies in the more robust habit with frequently broader leaves, the larger green and white flowers and the shape of the hood. This subspecies is mainly found in the Northern Cape of South Africa.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Disperis secunda subsp. aemula
Kurzweil, Hubert & Manning, John C. 2005 |
D. secunda (Thunb.) Sw. var. aemula Schltr., Bull. Herb. Boissier
1898: 923 |