Diaporthe millettiae H. Long, K.D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.57.35448 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/18E3940B-229E-5A73-9D42-16010B5CBA6D |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Diaporthe millettiae H. Long, K.D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Diaporthe millettiae H. Long, K.D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis sp. nov. Figure 3 View Figure 3
Diagnosis.
Characterised by larger J-shaped β-conidia.
Type.
China, Guangxi Province, Nanning City, from leaves of Millettia reticulata , 20 September 2016, Y. Wang, HGUP 9167, holotype, ex-type living culture GUCC 9167.
Description.
Colonies on PDA attaining 9 cm diam. after 10 days; coralloid with feathery branches at margin, adpressed, with apparent aerial mycelium, with numerous irregularly zonate dark stromata, isabelline becoming lighter towards the margin; reverse similar to surface, with zonations. Conidiomata pycnidial, multilocular, scattered, abundant on PDA after 3 wks, subglobose to irregular, 1.5-1.8 mm diam., ostiolate, with up to 1 mm necks when present. Conidiophores formed from the inner layer of the locular wall, sometimes reduced to conidiogenous cells, when present 1-septate, hyaline to pale yellowish-brown, cylindrical, 10-23 × 1-2.5 μm. Conidiogenous cells cylindrical to flexuous, tapered towards apex, hyaline, 8-18 × 1.5-3 μm. Alpha conidia abundant, fusiform, narrowed towards apex and base, mostly biguttulate, hyaline, 4.5-9 × 2-3.5 μm. Beta conidia scarce to abundant, flexuous to J-shaped, hyaline, 17.5-32 × 1-2 μm. Perithecia not seen.
Habitat and distribution.
Isolated from leaves of Millettia reticulata in China
Etymology.
Species epithet millettiae , referring to the host, Millettia reticulata from which the strain was isolated.
Notes.
Phylogenetic analysis combining four gene loci showed that Diaporthe millettiae (strain GUCC 9167) displayed a close relationship with D. arengae , D. pseudomangiferae and D. perseae with high bootstrap values ( Figure 1 View Figure 1 ). We compared the DNA base pair differences of the four gene regions, the main differences being in the β -tubulin and tef 1 genes, especially tef 1. Diaporthe millettiae produced two types of conidia (α, β), whereas D. pseudomangiferae only produced alpha conidia and D. perseae produced three types of conidia (α, β, γ). The β-conidia of D. arengae were smaller (20-25 × 1.5 μm) than those of Diaporthe millettiae (17.5-32 × 1-2 μm). The shape of β-conidia was also different. Conidiophores of D. arengae (10-60 μm) with more septa (0-6), were longer than those of D. millettiae (10-23 × 1-2.5 μm; 0-1-septate) ( Gomes et al. 2013).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |