Dascillus emarginatus, Fu & Jin & Wu, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5239.4.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DACCE8AC-4954-4939-BE28-D1D651415B2F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7643900 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/881687F3-FFEE-9146-FF20-3EEB2B0AFC06 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dascillus emarginatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Dascillus emarginatus sp. nov.
( Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1–2 , 4–9 View FIGURES 3–5 View FIGURES 6–9 , 11–22 View FIGURES 10–12 View FIGURES 13–24 , 25–26 View FIGURES 25–28 , 29–31 View FIGURES 29–30 View FIGURE 31 )
Type material. Holotype ♁: China, Hubei, Shennongjia, Dongxi Attendance Centre , 1-vi-2020, Ping Wang lgt . Paratypes: 14 ♁, 9 ♀, same data as holotype ; 1 ♀, China, Hubei, Shennongjia, Dongxi Attendance Centre , 1-vii-2019, Ping Wang lgt .
Description. Male ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–2 ). Length 17.2–18.3 mm, width 5.6–5.9 mm. Body 3.0–3.2× longer than broad. Head, antennae, pronotum, scutellar shield and venter black, elytra and legs dark brown. Elytral feebly shiny, glabrous. Head, scutellar shield and pronotal margin setae brown, not forming colour pattern, venter covered by dense brown pubescence.
Head. Antennae reaching middle of elytra. Antennomere 3 about 2.5–2.6× as long as broad, 1.1–1.2× as long as antennomere 4; ultimate antennomere distinctly longer than penultimate. Mandible strongly curved apically; incisor edge with two teeth. Apical palpomere of both maxilla and labium weakly expanded.
Pronotum trapezoidal, 0.5–0.6 × as long as wide, widest just before base; sides sinuate. Lateral carina narrowly explanate with marginal bead, edge smooth with distinct fringe of setae; anterior angles broadly rounded. Disc strongly convex, punctation coarse and dense.
Pterothorax. Scutellar shield 0.9–1.0 × as long as wide, emarginate anteriorly, acute posteriorly ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 3–5 ). Elytra moderately convex, together 2.3–2.4 × as long as wide, 4.4–4.5 × as long as pronotum.
Abdominal ventrites ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 6–9 ) with glabrous spots on each side; ventrite 5 distinctly projecting apically, 0.4–0.5 × as long as wide, 1.1–1.2 × as long as ventrite 4. Sternite IX ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–28 ) apically strongly emarginate, at base slightly emarginate, bearing uniformly short setae in middle and apical part. Posterior edge of tergite IX ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–28 ) also emarginate. Tergite X shorter than tergite IX, apically obtuse.
Aedeagus ( Figs 13–22 View FIGURES 13–24 ). Phallobase emarginate at base. Parameres longer than phallobase, inner margin upturned apically, slender and narrowly rounded at apex. Apex of ventral lobe obtuse; dorsal lobe also narrowly rounded at apex.
Female ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–2 , 29 View FIGURES 29–30 ). Externally identical to male. Length 18.8–20.3 mm, width 5.6–6.0 mm. Head, antennae, pronotum, scutellar shield and venter dark brown; apex of ventrite 5 obviously emarginate in middle ( Figs 6, 8–9 View FIGURES 6–9 ). Female spiculum ventrale slightly emarginate apically ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10–12 ), genitalia weakly sclerotised with vagina and bursa copulatrix not clearly separated; bursa copulatrix without sclerites; spermatheca small and not sclerotised. Ovipositor ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10–12 ) short; paraprocts entirely sclerotised, without baculi, slightly shorter than gonocoxites; proctiger absent; gonocoxites entirely sclerotised ventral of paraprocts, triangular and strongly bent, apices prominent, densely setose dorsally, without baculi; gonostyli absent.
Differential diagnosis. At first glance, the new species is very similar to D. attenuatus Jin, Xie & Zhu, 2017 , however, it can be easily distinguished from the latter by the combination of the following characters: body length over 17 mm, scutellar shield emarginate anteriorly ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 3–5 ); abdominal ventrites with glabrous spots on each side in both genders ( Figs 6–7 View FIGURES 6–9 ); ventral lobe of aedeagus broadly rounded apically; sternite IX apically strongly emarginate ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–28 ); apex of female ventrite 5 obviously emarginate in the middle ( Figs 6, 8–9 View FIGURES 6–9 ); spiculum ventrale also emarginate at apex ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10–12 ). While in D. attenuatus : body length less than 17 mm, scutellar shield truncate anteriorly ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–5 ); abdominal ventrites without glabrous spots on each side; apex of ventral lobe distinctly acute in the middle ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 13–24 ); sternite IX apically slightly emarginate ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25–28 ); apex of female ventrite 5 broadly rounded; spiculum ventrale truncate at apex ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10–12 ).
Remarks. The shape of the aedeagus is one of the characters frequently used for the identification of Dascillus taxa ( Fang et al. 2020, Jin et al., 2013). Recently, Terzani et al. (2017) detected that this character was not constant or specific for the Western Palaearctic dascillids. However, unlike in the widespread European species, we have not found any significant variation in the morphology of aedeagus in a series of eight males of D. emarginatus sp. nov. and three males of D. attenuates . Therefore, we consider the shape of ventral lobe as a constant character with other diagnostic characters to separate the new species from D. attenuatus .
Collection circumstances. Like other species of Dascillus in Shennongjia, males of D. emarginatus sp. nov. were observed feeding on pollen of Castanea sp. ( Fagales : Fagaceae ) while females suspending on the leaves of nearby unidentified plants in Dongxi Attendance Centre ( Figs 29–30 View FIGURES 29–30 ).
Etymology. The species name refers to the apex of females’ ventrite 5 obviously emarginate in the middle, distinguished D. emarginatus sp. nov. from all other known Dascillus spp ; the name is an adjective.
Distribution. So far known only from the type locality in Shennongjia Nature Reserve, Hubei Province, China ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |