Cyrtodactylus borgattaorum, Tran & Lam & Nguyen & Nguyen & Nguyen & Smith & Nguyen & Grismer, 2024

Tran, Thinh Gia, Lam, Ngon Quang, Nguyen, Truong Minh Nhat, Nguyen, Nga Thi, Nguyen, Thao Thi Phuong, Smith, Jacob, Nguyen, Vu Dang Hoang & Grismer, Lee, 2024, A new granite cave dwelling endemic species of the Cyrtodactylus intermedius group (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Hon Son Island, Kien Giang Province, Vietnam, Zootaxa 5541 (4), pp. 485-512 : 497-505

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5541.4.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AEB83B6-3CF9-491E-BE46-50CE87F404CD

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/810087C6-9D1F-FF8C-FF36-961BF38DFC7F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Cyrtodactylus borgattaorum
status

sp. nov.

Cyrtodactylus borgattaorum sp. nov.

Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6 , Tables 8, 9.

Holotype. ITBCZ 11078 , subadult male collected by Nguyen Dang Hoang Vu on Hon Son Island , Kien Hai District, Kien Giang Province, southwestern Vietnam (9.81253° N, 104.62040° E) on 13 January 2024, at approximately 25 m a.s.l.. GoogleMaps

Paratypes. ITBCZ 11066 , subadult male collected by Nguyen Dang Hoang Vu on the same island as the holotype (9.81363° N, 104.62281° E) on 15 January 2024, at approximately 12 m GoogleMaps a.s.l..

Diagnosis ( Table 8). Cyrtodactylus borgattaorum sp. nov. is separated from all congeners by having the combination of 12 supralabials; 10 or 11 infralabials; 22 or 23 small, rounded, smooth, paravertebral tubercles; 12 rows of small, rounded, smooth, longitudinally arranged body tubercles; 35 or 39 ventrals; 8 or 10 expanded subdigital lamellae, 12 or 13 unexpanded subdigital lamellae, and 21 or 22 total subdigital lamellae on the fourth toe; 21 or 22 enlarged femorals; 8 or 9 enlarged precloacals; 8 or 9 precloacal pores in males; three rows of enlarged post-precloacals; 3/3 postcloacal tubercles; enlarged femorals and enlarged precloacals not continuous; proximal femorals nearly same size of distal femorals; body tubercles smooth, greatly reduced; no pocketing between digits on the hands and feet; subdigital toe lamellae expanded nearly beyond body of digit; two dark-colored pigmented blotches on top of head; four dark-colored dorsal bands lacking lightened centers, thinner than light-colored interspaces between bands, bordered by prominent white tubercles; no dark body markings in light-colored interspaces; limbs with white tubercles; and six dark-colored and light-colored caudal bands.

Description of holotype ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6 ; Table 8, 9). Subadult male SVL 65.84 mm, TaiL 83.35 mm.

Head. Head distinct from neck, elongate (HL/SVL 0.28), depressed (HD/HL 0.41), longer than width (HW/HL 0.66), and triangular shaped in dorsal view; lores concave anteriorly, moderately concave on prefrontal region, weakly inflated posteriorly, canthus rostralis rounded; snout elongate (SN/HL 0.46), rounded in dorsal view; eye large (ED/HL 0.25), pupils vertical; ear opening below the dark nuchal loop, obliquely directed and oval, small in size (EL/HL 0.07), eye to ear distance shorter than eye to nostril distance (EE/EN 0.83); rostral rectangular with a medial suture, bordered by 1/1 supranasal and single internasal posteriorly, 1 st /1 st supralabial laterally; external nares bordered by rostral anteriorly, 1/1 supranasal dorsally, 2/2 postnasals posteriorly, 1 st /1 st supralabial ventrally; supralabials 12/12; scales of rostrum and lores flat to slightly raised, larger than granular scales on top of head and occiput; infralabials 11/11; scales on the top of occiput intermixed with distinct, enlarged tubercles; mental triangular, bordered by 1 st /1 st infralabial laterally, 1/1 trapezoidal postmentals posteriorly; postmentals two pairs, enlarged, first pairs in contact with each other; gular and throat scales small, granular, larger laterally near infralabials, slightly larger posteriorly, flatter, smooth, imbricate, pectoral and ventral scales.

Body. Body relatively long (AG/SVL 0.40) with well-defined ventrolateral folds; dorsal scales small, granular, interspersed with small, smooth, rounded, semi-regularly arranged tubercles extending from anterior edge of nuchal loop onto base of tail but no farther;12 longitudinal rows of tubercles at midbody; approximately 22 paravertebral tubercles; 39 flat, imbricate, ventral scales much larger than dorsal scales; 9 enlarged precloacal scales, and bearing pits; no deep precloacal groove or depression; and three rows of large post-precloacal scales on midline.

Limbs. Forelimbs thin, relatively long (FL/SVL 0.17); lacking tubercles, granular scales of forelimbs slightly larger than those on body; palmar scales rounded, slightly raised; digits well-developed, inflected at basal interphalangeal joints, slightly narrower distal to inflections; subdigital lamellae transversely expanded, those proximal to joint inflections much wider than those distal to inflections; claws well-developed, sheathed by a dorsal and ventral scale; hind limbs thin, wider than forelimbs, long (TBL/SVL=0.20), covered dorsally by granular scales interspersed with enlarged tubercles same sized as on dorsum; ventral scales of thighs flat, imbricate, larger than dorsals; subtibial scales large, flat, imbricate; one row of 11/11 enlarged femoral scales terminating distally before knee, not continuous with enlarged precloacal scales; proximal femorals much smaller than distal femorals, the posteroventral margin of thigh covered with smaller, rounded scales; femoral pores absent; plantar scales flat; digits well-developed, inflected at basal interphalangeal joints; basal subdigital lamellae well expanded transversely, expanding nearly beyond body of digits, claws well-developed, sheathed by a dorsal and ventral scale at base; and 10/10 wide proximal subdigital lamellae on fourth toe, 12/12 more narrow lamellae distal to joint inflection, 22 total subdigital lamellae.

Tail. Tail length longer than snout-vent length (TL/SVL 1.27), 83.35 mm, 6.18 mm wide at base, tapering to a point; caudal scales small, square, in transverse rows on dorsal side; subcaudal region bearing large, transverse scales; body tubercles not extending beyond the posterior edge of hemipenal region; 3/3 conical postcloacal tubercles at left and right side of base of hemipenal region; and postcloacal scales flat, imbricate.

Coloration ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ). In life, light-brown color of top of head, limbs, and dorsum; top of head dark-with two dark-brown blotches on parietal region; dark brown nuchal loop extends from posterior margin of one orbit to posterior margin of other orbit with white tubercles extending from the posterior margin of one orbit across the nape to the posterior margin of the opposing orbit; four dark brown bands edged with lightened centers, and white tubercles terminating above the ventrolateral folds extending from shoulders to pelvis; dark brown body bands thinner than light brown interspaces; limbs brown, with white tubercles; 6 wide, dark-brown caudal bands wider than 5 light-colored caudal bands and the last light-colored caudal band the largest; all caudal bands immaculate, caudal bands encircle the tail; iris gold, bearing thin, dark-brown reticulations; ventral surfaces of gular region, limbs and body dull-white with small, dark spots on each ventral scales. In preservative the color became faint, but the pattern had no change.

Variation. The second specimen resembles the coloration and pattern of the holotype. Meristic differences of the second specimen examined are presented in Table 8.

Etymology. We name the new species in honor of the Borgatta family, and in particular Drs. Edgar and Marie Borgatta. Both made significant contributions to the fields of sociology and gemology. Their spirit of generosity and passion for discovery and knowledge have and will continue to inspire future generations. We recommend “Borgatta’s Bent-toed Gecko” and “Thằn lằn Chân Ngón Bo-ga-ta” as the English and Vietnamese common names of the new species, respectively. Edgar and Marie Borgatta were the grandparents of coauthor Jacob Smith’s wife, Emilia Borgatta Smith.

Comparisons ( Table 9). C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. auralensis by having a higher number of supralabials (12 vs. 8–9), a lower number of paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 29–32), fewer longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs.17–18), lower total number of enlarged femoral scales (21 or 22 vs. up to 28), fewer dark caudal bands (6 vs. 9–10), fewer light caudal bands (6 vs. 10–11), having body tubercles greatly reduced (vs. not greatly reduced), having femoral and precloacal scales not continuous (vs. continuous), having proximal femorals nearly the same size as the distal femorals (vs. <1/2 size of distal femorals); C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. bokorensis by having a higher number of supralabials (12 vs. 8), a lower number of paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 30–33), fewer longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs.18–20), a lower number of ventral scales (35 or 39 vs. 42–48), a higher number of subdigital lamellae on the 4 th toe (21 or 22 vs. 18–20), a lower number of enlarged femoral scales (21 or 22 vs. 27–30), fewer dark caudal bands (6 vs. 11–12), fewer light caudal bands (6 vs. 10–12), having body tubercles greatly reduced (vs. not greatly reduced), having proximal femorals nearly the same size as the distal femorals (vs. <1/2 the size of the distal femorals); C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. cardamomensis by having a higher number of supralabials (12 vs. 7–8), a lower number of paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 29–34), fewer longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs.17–21), a higher total of subdigital lamellae on the 4 th toe (21 or 22 vs. 17–19), a lower number of enlarged femoral scales (21 or 22 vs. 23–28), fewer dark caudal bands (6 vs. 10–11), fewer light caudal bands (6 vs. 10–12), having body tubercles greatly reduced (vs. not greatly reduced), having femoral and precloacal scales not continuous (vs. continuous), having dark pigmented blotches on top of the head (vs. absence); C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. disjunctus by having a lower number of paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 41), a higher number of ventral scales (up to 39 vs. 36), more subdigital lamellae on the 4 th toe (21 or 22 vs. 17), a lower number of enlarged precloacal scales (8 or 9 vs. 10), more post-precloacal scale rows (three vs. one), having dark pigmented blotches on top of the head (vs. absence), fewer dark and white caudal bands (6 vs. 11), having proximal femorals nearly the same size as the distal femorals (vs. <1/2 the size of the distal femorals), dark dorsal bands bordered by prominently colored white tubercles (vs. absent), the presence of white tubercles on hind limbs (vs. absence); C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. intermedius by having a higher number of supralabials (12 vs. 8), fewer paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 29–31), fewer longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs. 18–20), a higher total of subdigital lamellae on 4 th toe (21 or 22 vs. 19–20), a lower number of enlarged femoral scales (21 or 22 vs. 22–25), having body tubercles greatly reduced (vs. not greatly reduced), having femoral and precloacal scales not continuous (vs. continuous), having dark pigmented blotches on top of the head (vs. absence); C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. hontreensis by having more longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs. 7 in C. hontreensis ), a lower number of ventral scales (35 or 39 vs. 40–42), more subdigital lamellae on 4 th toe (21 or 22 vs. 17–19), a higher number of enlarged femoral scales (21 or 22 vs. 4–9), more body bands (4 vs. 3), having dark pigmented blotches on top of the head (vs. absence), the presence white caudal bands (vs. absence); C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. kohrongensis by having a higher number of supralabials (12 vs. 8–10), a lower number of paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 25–33), fewer longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs. 16–20), fewer dark caudal bands (6 vs. 8–11), fewer light caudal bands (6 vs. 9–11), having body tubercles greatly reduced (vs. not greatly reduced), having proximal femorals nearly same size as the distal femorals (vs. <1/2 the size of the distal femorals), having dark pigmented blotches on top of the head (vs. absence); C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. kulenensis by having a higher number of supralabials (12 vs. 8–11), a lower number of paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 33–38), fewer longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs. 17–19), having femoral and precloacal scales not continuous (vs. continuous), having proximal femorals nearly the same size as the distal femorals (vs. <1/2 the size of the distal femorals), having dark pigmented blotches on top of the head (vs. absence); C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. laangensis by having a higher number of supralabials (12 vs. 7–9), a lower number of paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 29–32), fewer longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs. 17–18), a higher total of subdigital lamellae on the 4 th toe (21 or 22 vs. 18–20), a higher number of enlarged femoral scales (21 or 22 vs. 0–16), fewer dark caudal bands (6 vs. 10–12), fewer light caudal bands (6 vs. 10–12), having body tubercles greatly reduced (vs. not greatly reduced), having proximal femorals nearly the same size as the distal femorals (vs. <1/2 the size of distal femorals); C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. septimontium by having a higher number of supralabials (12 vs. 8–10), a lower number of paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 23–30), fewer longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs. 16–20), a lower number of ventral scales (35–39 vs. up to 46), a higher total of subdigital lamellae on the 4 th toe (21 or 22 vs. 17–20), a lower number of enlarged femoral scales (21 or 22 vs. 24–33), more postcloacal tubercles (3 vs. 2), fewer dark caudal bands (6 vs. 10–11), fewer light caudal bands (6 vs. 9–11), having body tubercles greatly reduced (vs. not greatly reduced), having femoral and precloacal scales not continuous (vs. continuous), having proximal femorals nearly the same size as the distal femorals (vs. <1/2 the size of distal femorals), having dark pigmented blotches on top of the head (vs. absence); C. borgattaorum sp. nov. differs from C. thylacodactylus by having a higher number of supralabials (12 vs. 7), a lower number of paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 29–31), fewer longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs. 18–20), a higher total of subdigital lamellae on 4 th toe (21 or 22 vs. 15–18), fewer dark caudal bands (6 vs. 10–12), fewer light caudal bands (6 vs. 10–12), having body tubercles greatly reduced (vs. not greatly reduced), having femoral and precloacal scales not continuous (vs. continuous), lacking pocketing between the digits of the hind feet (vs. presence), having dark pigmented blotches on top of the head (vs. absence).

C. borgattaorum sp. nov. is most closely related to C. phuquocensis in morphological characters but the new species can be distinguished from C. phuquocensis by having fewer paravertebral tubercles (22 or 23 vs. 25–31), fewer longitudinal rows of tubercles (12 vs. 16–19), a lower number of ventral scales (35–39 vs. up to 43), more subdigital lamellae on the 4 th toe (21 or 22 vs. 15–19), a lower total number of enlarged femoral scales (21 or 22 vs. up to 30), fewer dark caudal bands (6 vs. 10–12), fewer light caudal bands (6 vs. 10–12), having body tubercles greatly reduced vs. not greatly reduced, having femoral and precloacal scales not continuous (vs. continuous), having proximal femorals nearly the same size as the distal femorals (vs. <1/2 the size of the distal femorals), one small intersupranasal (vs. two intersupranasals of equal size), and its significantly different (p =0.012) morphospatial position in the meristic-morphometric PCA.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Squamata

Family

Gekkonidae

Genus

Cyrtodactylus

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF