Cryptophyllium chrisangi (Seow-Choen, 2017) Cumming & Bank & Bresseel & Constant & Tirant & Dong & Sonet & Bradler, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1018.61033 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7E9360A5-A359-437A-91C0-04C74B1FE9D6 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A16BAF51-41C0-5232-A409-75226EEEBA20 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Cryptophyllium chrisangi (Seow-Choen, 2017) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Cryptophyllium chrisangi (Seow-Choen, 2017) comb. nov. Figures 8M View Figure 8 , 8N View Figure 8 , 9B View Figure 9 , 24 View Figure 24 , 25 View Figure 25 , 26 View Figure 26
Material examined.
(7 ♀♀, 5 ♂♂, 10 eggs): 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀: "Singapore, ex breeding" (RBINS); 1 ♂: "Singapore (Pulau Ubin), Collected at light, by Francis Seow-Choen, January 5th, 2018 (0-75 m elv)" (Coll RC 18-279); 1 ♂: "Thailand: Satun Province, Tarutao Island" (UCR); 1 ♀: "Sarawak: Kuching, 12.12, J.M. Bryan., B.M.1931-150." (NHMUK); 1 ♀: "P. Phyllium siccifolium , 4.93 Tapah, Dr. Yeh" (LKCNHM); 10 eggs: “Singapore” (Coll RC 18-332-18-341); 1 ♀: "Presented by Dr. Brooke, St. John’s I. 26.4.09, Coll Freie Universitat Berlin Sammlung Exotische Insekten, DEI Hemimetabola #100117".
Photographic records: 2 ♀♀: Thailand: Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thung Song District, August 2020 (photographed by Tatsatorn Dharithai, Thailand);
1 ♂: Indonesia, Pulau Weh Island off the coast of Sumatra (photographed by Mathieu MJP Van Goethem, South Africa).
Remarks.
This species is one which was brought into the breeding community (Fig. 24A View Figure 24 ) and has therefore allowed thorough observation of the adults, nymph, and egg morphology. Molecularly, Cryptophyllium chrisangi comb. nov. is sister species to Cryptophyllium westwoodii comb. nov. with these two species biogeographically separated by the Isthmus of Kra. The Isthmus of Kra is a notable line of biogeography for several organisms (e.g., Li and Li 2018; Parnell 2013) which separates the Ranong and Chumphon Provinces of Thailand (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ). This isthmus appears to be significant for the Phyllium (Phyllium) as no species are presently known north of this line, but insignificant for the Phyllium (Pulchriphyllium) as this group is found on both sides of this line.
With our herein designation of a neotype for Cryptophyllium westwoodii comb. nov. we can help to clear up possible significant confusion which surrounds this species. When Wood-Mason described this species in 1875 he did so with a male and female pair of syntypes from two different localities. The female was from "South Andaman" and the male was from "near Pahpoon, ca. 150 miles north of Moulmein, in the Salween country" ( Wood-Mason 1875). It is almost certain biogeographically that these syntypes represent two different phylliid species, not a singular Cryptophyllium westwoodii comb. nov. as he intended. Morphologically, Wood-Mason’s description and wonderful illustration of the female syntype interestingly appears very similar morphologically to Cryptophyllium chrisangi comb. nov. with the correct femoral and abdominal shapes, and alae length (Fig. 25 View Figure 25 ). With our designation of a neotype Cryptophyllium westwoodii comb. nov. from a male from the mainland, this leaves the Andaman female somewhat mysterious as few records> of phylliids have been noted from the Andaman Islands, all of which are Phyllium (Pulchriphyllium) bioculatum -like species, none representing a Cryptophyllium gen. nov. species. Hopefully one day a fresh specimen of this Cryptophyllium gen. nov. species from the Andamans can be located and molecularly compared with congenerics to identify if it is an additional Cryptophyllium chrisangi comb. nov. range expansion or an undescribed species.
Differentiation.
Females can be differentiated by the following combination of features: spade-shaped abdomen (as segment VII lacks lobes), mesopleura which are distinctly narrower on the anterior half, and alae which are only ca. ½ as long as the tegmina. Morphologically, this species is similar to Cryptophyllium westwoodii comb. nov. due to the femoral and mesopleura shape, but can be differentiated by the shorter alae (only half of the tegmina length) as Cryptophyllium westwoodii comb. nov. has alae which are nearly the same length as the tegmina (Fig. 68D View Figure 68 ). Additionally, Cryptophyllium athanysus comb. nov. is morphologically similar due to the femoral, mesopleura, and abdominal shape, but can immediately be differentiated by the metatibial exterior lobes which are lacking in Cryptophyllium chrisangi comb. nov.
Males are morphologically very similar to Cryptophyllium westwoodii comb. nov. and we have yet to find a reliable morphological feature to differentiate these two species. Both are morphologically variable and can even have a wide range of sizes which does not allow for confident differentiation when molecular markers and locality are unknown. One of the more consistent features however is the abdominal shape as Cryptophyllium westwoodii comb. nov. tends to have a slightly more spade-shaped abdomen with segments V-IX converging, and Cryptophyllium chrisangi comb. nov. having a slightly more ovoid abdomen with segments V-VI parallel or subparallel, but we have seen morphological intermediates which do not allow this as a diagnostic feature.
Distribution.
The type locality for Cryptophyllium chrisangi comb. nov. is mainland Singapore and it has additionally been recorded from St. John’s Island from a record in the SDEI collections. Additionally, we have observed specimens and photographs from several areas, including several from Thailand: Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thung Song District (Fig. 24D View Figure 24 ) and Satun Province, Tarutao Island (UCR coll.); one tentative old record of a large female from Malaysia, Sarawak, Kuching, from the NHMUK collection (Fig. 26 View Figure 26 ); an adult female from Tapah, Malaysia (LKCNHM); and a record from Indonesia, Pulau Weh Island off the coast of Sumatra (Fig. 24C View Figure 24 ). Hopefully molecular samples from these far-reaching areas can one day be obtained to confirm the identification as Cryptophyllium chrisangi comb. nov. but for now morphologically this is what these records> appear to represent.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |