Cicadomorphus lilianae, Martinez, 2020
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.985.51622 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7A38B594-F29D-43F1-8CB1-8B108AC18A1C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B2743EF-09FA-4AB2-9850-39DFB1D3C5C4 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:0B2743EF-09FA-4AB2-9850-39DFB1D3C5C4 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Cicadomorphus lilianae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cicadomorphus lilianae sp. nov. Figs 16 View Figures 12–25 , 22 View Figures 12–25 , 60 View Figures 59–63 , 82 View Figures 80–84 , 92, View Figure 92
Type material.
Holotype: ♂, Ecuador: Ecuador, Napo, Cosanga, 2150 m, 29 Mar. 1976, coll. N. Venedictoff Holotype ♂. Deposited in MGCL. Paratypes (8 ♂, 3 ♀, MGCL): Ecuador: Ecuador, Napo + 10km Papallacta, 2730 m, 13-15 Sep. 1982, coll. N. Venedictoff (7 ♂); Ecuador: Napo, El Carmelo Barbar’ 10 km, 2750 m, 19 Jan. 1985, coll. N. Venedictoff (1 ♀). (1 ♂, CNC): Ecuador: Ecuador, Napo province, 23 km road La Bonita, 2400 m, 7-9 Apr. 1986, coll. Stuart McKamey. (1 ♀, FSU): Ecuador: Ecuador, Zamora-Chinchipe Parque Nacional Podocarpus ridge forest, Bombuscaro area, Blacklight 2 × 15W (40), 04°06.84'S, 78°57.97'W, 23.iii. 2011, 19.30-20.30 h, ca. 1120 m, Gunnar Brehm leg. / DNA Barcode run 2011, COI-5P marker, University of Guelph / Arcec 32423 / [Arcec 32284] (1 ♀). Additional examined specimens (2 ♂ UNAB): Colombia: Colombia, Cundinamarca, Guasca, Choachi, Vda. El Curi, F. panes de Roka 1996 m, 02 Jun. 2013, coll. V. Raigozo (2 ♂).
Etymology.
This species is named in honor of my sister Lilian Martinez Canto (1989-2017) for her love, charisma, and support offered during all her beautiful life.
Diagnosis.
Cicadomorphus lilianae is small and the wing pattern is blurred, causing the lines to appear shapeless. The males have darker coloration than the females, and the line pattern is better defined. This species shares some features in genitalia with C. chuya , such as the tapered vesica.
Description.
Head. Palp black, terminal segment admixed with brown and white scales; frons dark yellow basally with some black scales; female ground color pale yellow with gray scales; antenna brownish orange. Thorax. Ground color dark yellow with some black tufts; female same color but with gray tufts; collar with black ground color with margins yellow, female with ground color gray. Wings. Both sexes dark yellow, similar in pattern, nevertheless female is paler, and wing pattern is basally almost imperceptible; forewing length: male 25-27 mm; female 31-33 mm; forewing yellow with pattern in black, but blurrier, male darker; both sexes with semi-hyaline areas with some scattered dark yellow scales; both sexes with blurry lines; orbicular spot elongate, ca. same size in both sexes; reniform spot heavily outlined with black scales; hindwing hyaline with fringe yellow, but gray on posterior margin. Legs. Yellow, except prothoracic legs, which are brown with some black scales. Abdomen. Gray with yellow tufts in middle of abdomen and on each side; brown tufts on A3-A7; female abdomen yellow with some brown scales. Male genitalia. Cucullus wide with apex wide; costal margin without setae; outer margin sharply bent; tooth-like protuberance small; lobe with external apex large; posterior margin of lobe curved; sacculus wide with narrow process touching tooth-like protuberance; saccus thin; tegumen narrow, lightly sclerotized, barely visible around uncus; juxta wide, upper side flat; aedeagus relatively wide, V-shaped in opening; tapered vesica; band of spines with a rounded ending. Female genitalia. Anal papilla small; relatively wide posterior apophysis 1 ⅓ × longer than anal papilla; sterigma open trapezoid shaped; anterior apophysis short; ductus bursae small, well-sclerotized; appendix bursae broad, sclerotized; corpus bursae ⅓ × longer than appendix bursae.
Immature stages.
Unknown.
Distribution.
This species has been found in Ecuador and Colombia at very variable elevations from 1100-2700 m (Fig. 92 View Figure 92 ).
Biology.
Unknown.
Remarks.
The tip of the left antenna from the type specimen was broken during examination (Fig. 16 View Figures 12–25 ). The paratype female is intact; however, the left orbicular spot is incomplete (Fig. 22 View Figures 12–25 ). Otherwise, the female forewing is more brightly colored than that of the male basally where the antemedial and basal lines are almost inconspicuous. The female paratype from FSU has a different DNA voucher label from the voucher published at http://barcodinglife.com.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |