Chrysogorgia delicata Nutting, 1908
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5321.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A1F2E418-67A3-4D1F-ABC9-6C2BA0F5190E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8211631 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388878C-FFBE-9C55-099C-E88E7782FE3A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chrysogorgia delicata Nutting, 1908 |
status |
|
Chrysogorgia delicata Nutting, 1908 View in CoL
Figs. 44 View FIGURE 44 , 45 View FIGURE 45 ; Table 9 View TABLE 9
Chrysogorgia delicata Nutting, 1908: 589–590 View in CoL , Pl. XLV, fig. 7.
Chrysogorgia sp. Versluys 1902: 78 , figs. 128–129.
Chrysogorgia delicata: Kükenthal 1919: 531 View in CoL .
Material examined. MBM286859 View Materials , station FX-Dive 221 (10°3′6″N, 140°9′30″E), a seamount (tentatively named as M5) on the Caroline Ridge, 1966 m, 9 June 2019 GoogleMaps .
Description. Colony attached to a rocky substrate in situ with a small bottlebrush shape ( Fig. 44A View FIGURE 44 ). Specimen short about 10 cm long and 6 cm wide in maximum with the holdfast not recovered ( Fig. 44B View FIGURE 44 ). Stem about 0.7 mm in diameter at base with golden metallic luster. Branching sequence 1/ 3L. Branches subdivided dichotomously, up to four orders with branching angle 70°–80°. Distance between adjacent branches 3–6 mm, orthostiche intervals 10– 17 mm, the first internode of branch 5–9 mm long and the terminal branchlets up to 12 mm long. Polyps on branch internode average 2 mm tall and 1–2 mm wide, usually with a small oval body, and became large with a cylindrical body in terminal and up to 4 mm tall ( Fig. 44C, D, F, G View FIGURE 44 ). Polyps usually arranged one on first and medial internode and one or two on terminal branchlets. Polyps in stem internodes small with eight extended tentacles, 0.5–1.0 mm tall and often arranged one in each internode. Tentacular part with eight obvious tentacles, up to 2.5 mm in terminal polyps. Verrucae absent.
Scales in aboral face of tentacle rachis transversely and alternately arranged, thick and nearly smooth, forked and branched with irregular shape, some of them curved with sparse fine warts and toothed edges of ends, measuring 75–497 × 10–283 μm ( Fig. 45A View FIGURE 45 ). Scales in pinnules longitudinally arranged, nearly smooth, usually a little curved with one end forked or broad and the other end narrow or sharp, some of them with many warts and finely toothed end surface, and branched with irregular shape, measuring 183–452 × 7–144 μm ( Fig. 45C, E View FIGURE 45 ). Scales in polyp body wall irregularly arranged, elongate and nearly smooth with an obvious medial contraction, occasionally with sparse fine warts, measuring 130–314 × 14–107 μm ( Fig. 45B View FIGURE 45 ). Its edges usually finely toothed on surface, forked or lobed with very irregular shape, occasionally protruding outward. Scales in coenenchyme longitudinally arranged, small and slender, nearly smooth and often with lobed edges, some of them forked or branched with irregular shape, measuring 190–419 × 17–95 μm ( Figs. 44E View FIGURE 44 , 45D View FIGURE 45 ).
Distribution and habitat. Off Menado, 1264– 1165 m ( Versluys 1902); Hawaii, 536–1463 m ( Nutting 1908); a seamount on the Caroline Ridge in the Western Pacific Ocean, 1966 m.
Remarks. The original description of Chrysogorgia delicata Nutting, 1908 is unclear. As described by Nutting, the polyp’s sclerites are same with Chrysogorgia sp. (described by Versluys 1902, p78). We compared our specimen with the descriptions of Versluys and Nutting, and found it matches well with them. Therefore, the characters of C. delicata can be summarized by having a bottlebrush-shaped colony, nearly smooth and more forked or lobed scales with various shape in polyp body wall, slender and nearly smooth scales often with lobed edges and irregular shape in coenenchyme, and nearly smooth scales usually curved with one end forked or branched and broad, and the other end narrow or sharp in pinnules. It is similar to C. axillaris ( Wright & Studer, 1889) and C. sibogae Versluys, 1902 , but differs from them by more irregular scales with more lobed and branched edges in polyp body wall and coenenchyme (vs. both relatively regular with less lobes) ( Table 9 View TABLE 9 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chrysogorgia delicata Nutting, 1908
Xu, Yu, Zhan, Zifeng & Xu, Kuidong 2023 |
Chrysogorgia delicata: Kükenthal 1919: 531
Kukenthal, W. 1919: 531 |
Chrysogorgia delicata
Nutting, C. C. 1908: 590 |
Chrysogorgia sp. Versluys 1902: 78
Versluys, J. 1902: 78 |