Carex graciliflora Dunn (1908: 372)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.531.1.4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5851124 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7123D92A-FF9D-1E23-FF1A-2AB8FBC7FB0C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Carex graciliflora Dunn (1908: 372) |
status |
|
Carex graciliflora Dunn (1908: 372) View in CoL . Type:— CHINA. Fokien [Fujian], central Fujian, Sui Kai Kau , Apr. to Jun. 1905, Hongkong Herb. 3657 (holotype: K-000961012!).
= Carex dayunshanensis L.K. Ling & Y.Z. Huang View in CoL (in Ling, 1995: 689). syn. nov. Type:— CHINA. Fujian, Dehua, Shangyong Xiang , Houzhai Village , 8 Jun. 1989, Y.Z. Huang 188 (holotype: FNU-00036559!), not 198.
= Carex wuyishanensis S. Yun Liang (1996: 94) View in CoL . syn. nov. Type:— CHINA. Fujian, Chongan [Wuyishan Shi], Mt. Wuyi , from Sangang to Nanshan , 21 Apr. 1955, M.J. Wang 3387 (holotype: PE!).
Carex graciliflora Dunn (1908: 372) , was described as a new species from an immature specimen, which was similar to C. brunnea Thunberg (1784: 38) , and now was placed in sect. Graciles in Roalson et al. 2021. It has not been treated in Flora of China or other Chinese floras to date. The holotype displays pseudo-lateral culms, spikes androgynous, 1–3 in each bract sheath, utricles glabrous, and stigmas 3 (Dunn described as ‘stylus 2-fidus’) ( Figure 2 View FIGURE 2 : A). All these characters revealed that this plant is more related to C. grandiligulata Kükenthal (in Diels, 1905: 9) and C. glossostigma (in sect. Siderostictae Franchet, 1898: 106) than to C. brunnea .
Types of both Carex dayunshanensis L.K. Ling & Y.Z. Huang (in Ling, 1995: 689) and C. wuyishanensis S. Yun Liang (1996: 94) were collected from Fujian Province of SE China. The former was initially reduced to a synonym of C. glossostigma , but the holotype and two paratypes showed leaf blades 4.5–7 mm wide, glabrous, and lax androgynous spikes with 3–7 utricles at the base. The collection by ‘ Y.Z. Huang (Ȓ以ë) 188’ was marked as ‘type’ (equivalent to ‘ 模式标本 ’ or holotype) of C. dayunshanensis but mistakenly numbered as ‘198’ in the protologue ( Figure 2 View FIGURE 2 : B). Compared to the type materials of C. dayunshanensis and C. wuyishanensis with that of C. graciliflora ( Figure 2 View FIGURE 2 ), this resulted in that the former two names have to be reduced to synonyms of the latter.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Carex graciliflora Dunn (1908: 372)
Jin, Shui-Hu, Lu, Yi-Fei, Chen, Wei-Jie & Jin, Xiao-Feng 2022 |
Carex wuyishanensis
S. Yun Liang 1996: 94 |