Atractides dubius, (SOKOLOW, 1940)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1096-3642.06-0.00051.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/96048783-0E66-FFC4-FF7B-A802FAE5F8E7 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Atractides dubius |
status |
|
ATRACTIDES DUBIUS ( SOKOLOW, 1940)
Megapus spinipes var.? Sokolow, 1927
Megapus spinipes dubius Sokolow, 1940
Syn. to A. arcuatus ( Thor, 1914) : syn. nov.
Type series: Holotype ♀ ZISP 418 Type ♀ Megapus [cancelled: nodipalpis Thor var.I] spinipes var. caucasica n.v. I.Sokolow det.; Kaukas. 8.XI.24 Rugenj. W.Tr.G. 9.1.07 Wlduk. (No.13) Tarnogradskij leg.; comparison with figure 159 in Sokolow (1940) indicates that the description of A. dubius was based on this specimen. The name caucasica was not published by Sokolow, possibly in view of the already existing name kaukasiensis Thor, 1914 . State of conservation: idiosoma with separate dorsum, ventrum strapped in two areas, genital field separate from coxal field, all left legs missing or heavily damaged; gnathosoma separate, lateral, with palps and chelicerae in situ; two eggs.
Description: see under A. arcuatus .
Discussion: At the time when this taxon was described, the morphology of A. spinipes was poorly understood. Sokolow characterized it by unfused, paired genital plates in males (thus, a character of misshaped intersexual specimens) and P-3 and P-4 equal in L in females (a character within the range of variability of A. nodipalpis ). Furthermore, as also done by Halbert (1911), Sokolow attributed to A. spinipes the presence of swimming hairs on legs, a character within the subgenus restricted to A. ovalis .
Atractides dubius differs from all specimens pooled by various authors at that time under the name of A. spinipes due to the lineated integument. From this point of view, it is probably similar to the little known A. arcuatus , a species described from the Caucasus as well, of which the type material is lost. If we compare the available information, there is agreement in dimensions and arrangement of Ac, and in shape and setation of palp. Regarding idiosoma and palp measurements, A. dubius exceeds the values provided for A. arcuatus , but the measurement differences could be examples of normal intraspecific variability. No useful information is available on the morphology of the female I-L-5 and - 6 in A. arcuatus . In male A. arcuatus , I-L-5 is more slender than in the type of A. dubius , but in this regard we observe sexual dimorphism also in other Atractides species. The I-L-5/6 L ratio (1.31) is identical in the male A. arcuatus and the female A. dubius . The available information suggests that A. dubius is a synonym of A. arcuatus , a species that merits a detailed redescription.
ATRACTIDES ROBUSTUS ( SOKOLOW, 1940)
( FIGS 42A–H View Figure 42 , 43H View Figure 43 )
Megapus nodipalpis robustus Sokolow, 1940
Type series: Syntypes ♂, ZISP 1 View Materials /889 [red] N 392 type ♂ Megapus nodipalpis var. robustus n.var.; Kuban [..] 15.VIII.32 Tarnogradskij [..] 2 ♂ on one slide. Lectotype: the specimen near the species label. State of conservation: dorsum separate, coxae longitudinally fractured (measurement impossible), gnathosoma and left I-L separate, chelicerae and right palp isolated, P-3 broken, Gsk missing. Paralectotype: the specimen near the collecting site label. State of conservation: idiosoma broken in two parts, genital field missing, gnathosoma and both I-L in situ, one palp separate. Paralectotype: ♀, ZISP 2 View Materials /890 [red] N 397 Type ♀ Megapus nodipalpis S.Thor var. robustus n.var.; [..] 6.IX.32 Tarnogradskij [..] 1 ♀. State of conservation: dorsum separate, gnathosoma in situ, both palps and left I-L separate, right I-L- missing. Locus typicus: Caucasus, widely distributed in affluents of Kuban river . Further collecting area mentioned in the first description: Kolskij peninsula, Warsuga river (coll. W. I. Schadin) .
Material examined: ZISP 393, 398, 400, 410, all labelled Megapus nodipalpis S.Thor var. robustus nov. var. and Kuban [..] Tarnogradskij, collecting dates VIII/ IX 1932; SMF KOViets 1521 ‘Harz Kellwasser’ 1 ♂, 1 ♀.
Description:
General features dorsal integument: striated (9/10); muscle attachments: unsclerotized genital field: Ac in triangular arrangement
I-L: I-L-5 with diverging ventral and dorsal margins, S-1–2 with blunt tips, S- 1 longish, slender, S-2 thickened in basal third; I-L-6 curved, slender, maximum height basally genital field: Ac large, in a triangle excretory pore: smooth; Vgl-1: not fused to Vgl-2
palp: strong sexual dimorphism; P-4 1: 1: 1, sword seta long, near proximoventral hair
IV-L-4/5 distally swollen and with pointed sheaths covering the base of the following segment
Males
Lectotype genital field: anterior margin indented, posterior margin deeply indented, with a small medial extension in the posterior bay, Ac-3 long, distally narrowed; genital setae: 70
palp: ventral margin P-2 with strongly pointed ventrodistal protrusion, separated by a small longitudinal sulcus from a convexly rounded lateral area, P-3 concave, P-4 strongly thickened near proximoventral hair, sword seta proximal to proximoventral hair idiosoma L/W 1000/730; glandularia 27
coxal field L 450; Cx-3 W –; Cx-1 + 2 mL 139, Il 338, W 448
I-L-5 dL 270, vL 193, dL/vL 1.40, HA-HC 67, 81, 92, dl/HB 3.33
S-1 L 132, L/ W 14.7, S-2 L 100, L/ W 9.1, interspace 29, L S-1/2 1.32
I-L-6 L 193, HA-HC 36, 22, 31, dL/HB 8.77; L I-L-5/6 1.40
genital field L/W 189/224, Ac-1–3 L 55-68-87
gnathosoma vL 224; chelicera L 323, L/H 5.98, bS/claw 2.26
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Atractides dubius
Gerecke, Reinhard 2003 |
Megapus spinipes dubius
Sokolow 1940 |
Megapus nodipalpis robustus
Sokolow 1940 |