Anthophorabia megachilis
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.274436 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5694392 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DBAE07-2309-FFD2-5AEF-FCD3F19AF932 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Anthophorabia megachilis |
status |
|
Other M. megachilis View in CoL synonymies
In his catalog, Peck (1951) synonymized Pteromalus gerardi Hickok with M. megachilis ; it is unknown whether he saw actual specimens. Unfortunately, the types of P. g e r a rd i may be lost (T. Nuhn, 1/30/2008, in litt.); the type deposition is not listed on Noyes’ (2003) web site.
Hickok’s (1875) brief description of the male P. g e r a rd i is superficially similar to Dahms’ (1984a) description of male M. femorata , but a careful reading of Hickok (1875) suggests that P. g e r a rd i actually may prove to be a senior synonym for M. digitata . Hickok (1875, p. 134) notes each male antenna “has a strong spine, projecting inward, giving it the appearance of the antler of a deer.” This seems a clear reference to the distinctive mesal projection on the scape of M. digitata that is the basis for the specific epithet ( Dahms 1984a, his figs. 197–198); this is the only species of Melittobia that possesses such a structure. Further behavioral support is provided by the observation ( Hickok 1875, pp. 134–135) that “… the males have but few opportunities of coming in collision; but when this occurs one of the males is quite sure to forfeit his life. If one succeeds in grasping the other around the neck or waist with his mandibles he holds firmly on, and drives them slowly through nerve and muscle of his victim, till the lifeless trunk and abdomen fall asunder.” As noted above, M. femorata males are relatively tolerant of one another and seldom engage in fatal combat, but males of M. digitata are vicious fighters ( Hartley & Matthews 2003). Unfortunately, until Hickok’s types are located, exact species identification must remain as speculation.
Dahms did not examine the syntypical series of 13 females that Brues (1909) named as Chrysocharis aeneus . We obtained them from MCPM and, as noted above, confirmed that they are also M. megachilis , with an average head length to genal width of 1.3; all had 4 setae on the submarginal vein and a pair of setae on the submedian lobes of the scutellum. We have designated one of the females as Lectotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |