Anthidiellum (Ranthidiellum) apicepilosum (Dover, 1929)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1186.95203 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4417B04C-BD94-49DC-9513-3B89EB6E5F72 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/01BF2C31-11F0-54B5-BA98-D944697DD364 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Anthidiellum (Ranthidiellum) apicepilosum (Dover, 1929) |
status |
|
Anthidiellum (Ranthidiellum) apicepilosum (Dover, 1929) View in CoL
Fig. 3 View Figure 3
Dianthidium apicepilosum Dover, 1929: 55 (♀). Holotype from "Khao Ram, Siam" [= Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand] (NHMUK, examined); photograph available at https://data.nhm.ac.uk/object/17eba820-1a7d-4175-a9f8-f367b04dbf94/1632960000000).
Dianthidium apicepilosum Dover: Pagden 1934: 490-492 (♂ nov.).
Anthidiellum (Ranthidiellum) apicepilosum (Dover): Pasteels 1969: 48-49.
Anthidiellum ( Rhanthidiellum [sic!]) Rhanthidiellum apicepilosum (Dover): Pasteels 1972 (redescription): 103-106, unjustified emendation of Ranthidiellum Pasteels, 1969.
Material examined.
1♀. Khao Ram, Siam [= Thailand: Nakhon Si Thammarat: Ronpibun, Khao Ramrome], 750-1200 [possibly altitude], 24 Feb. 1922, Anthidium apicepilosum Dover , 1926 (holotype NHMUK: 014026685) .
Distribution.
Malaysia (Negeri Sembilan, Penang, Selangor), Thailand (Nakhon Si Thammarat). The species is rarely found, hence the records are based on the original designation ( Dover 1929) and the additional report of their nest ( Pagden 1934)
Diagnosis.
Anthidiellum apicepilosum has a black body with distinct brownish coloration disrupted. Since only the female is known, the most comparable characters include the following: clypeus, scape, lower paraocular area, tegula, axilla, and the margin of scutellum brownish; scutum black; wing base conspicuously dark brown, clearly contrasting to apical hyaline parts on 1st submarginal cells; T1-T5 with reddish to brownish ferruginous apical band that becomes wider on the rear segments; T6 black; the rear of the metasoma covered with yellowish hairs; foreleg light brownish, generally brighter than in midleg and hindleg, which are almost black on their tibia and basitarsus. According to Pagden (1934) and Pasteels (1972), the male is superficially similar to the female but has lighter ferruginous leg parts especially on midleg and hindleg; S5 with a marginal black comb (> 60 teeth), gonoforceps bifid as in other Ranthidiellum species.
Remarks.
This is the first species of Ranthidiellum that has been documented for its nesting biology ( Pagden 1934). In morphology, the species is very close to Anthidiellum rufomaculatum (Cameron, 1902) with a minor difference in that the female holotype of " Protoanthidium rufomaculatum " [= Anthidiellum rufomaculatum , female from Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia] has more minute paraocular marks, more slender marginal bands on its axilla and scutellum, and a reddish black translucent band present basally on the black integument of T1-T5. However, to confirm the status, there is no certain evidence that the males described by Pagden (1934) are the exact Anthidiellum apicepilosum , even though the locality of Bakit Kutu, Selangor, is adjacent to the Negeri Sembilan, where the female paratype was caught (further discussion in Nalinrachatakan et al. 2021b).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Apoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |
Anthidiellum (Ranthidiellum) apicepilosum (Dover, 1929)
Nalinrachatakan, Pakorn, Ascher, John S., Kasparek, Max, Traiyasut, Prapun, Thanoosing, Chawatat & Warrit, Natapot 2023 |
Ranthidiellum
Pasteels 1969 |
Dianthidium apicepilosum
Dover 1929 |
Dianthidium apicepilosum
Dover 1929 |
Anthidiellum
Cockerell 1904 |