Amanita curtipes, F. PSEUDOVALENS AND
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2022v43a6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829518 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B4F87E5-0C24-E248-FCF3-DA2023FA640F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Amanita curtipes |
status |
|
COMPARISON WITH AMANITA CURTIPES F. PSEUDOVALENS AND View in CoL View at ENA
When comparing the descriptions of all European taxa of series Amidella , based on Neville & Poumarat (2004), as shown in Table 6 View TABLE , the Portuguese specimens of Amanita pseudovalens comb. nov., stat. nov. did not conform with the description for the genetically indistinct A. curtipes f. pseudovalens ( Neville & Poumarat 2004) , diverging in their soil and vegetation affinities and in the microscopy. Therefore, we understand them as representing a separate taxon, however at infraspecific level.
Moreover, Table 6 View TABLE shows that the tartessiana variety resembles A. ponderosa in almost every aspect – the obvious difference being the so far unknown occurrence of large and heavy specimens in the former – being, by comparison, much less similar to the conspecific A. pseudovalens comb. nov., stat. nov. collected in France.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |