Adetus binotatus ( Thomson, 1868 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.3677213 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E65684F6-5A77-4970-9BCD-A4CE2971CF8D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3681535 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D66423-CE42-BA5A-52BD-866F24C24D6A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Adetus binotatus ( Thomson, 1868 ) |
status |
|
Adetus binotatus ( Thomson, 1868) View in CoL
( Fig. 1–5 View Figures 1–13 )
Tautoclines binotata Thomson 1868: 155 View in CoL ; Bates, 1872: 234; Thomson 1878: 11 (type); Bates, 1880: pl. 8, fig. 2.
Adetus binotatus View in CoL ; Bates 1880: 107; 1885: 342 (distr.); Aurivillius 1922: 289 (cat.); Blackwelder 1946: 596 (checklist); Breuning 1960: 181 (cat.); 1971: 314 (rev.); Chemsak et al. 1992: 114 (checklist); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 184 (checklist); Monné 1994: 25 (cat.); Maes et al. 1994: 29 (distr.); Noguera and Chemsak 1996: 404 (checklist); Maes 1998: 912 (distr.); Turnbow et al. 2003: 20 (distr.); Monné 2005: 277 (cat.); Audureau 2008: 14 (distr.); Swift et al. 2010: 49 (distr.); Maes et al. 2010: 80 (distr.); Monné 2018: 279 (cat.).
Adetus leucostigma Bates 1880: 108 View in CoL ; 1885: 342 (distr.); Aurivillius 1922: 289 (cat.); Blackwelder 1946: 596 (checklist); Breuning 1960: 181 (cat.); Chemsak and Linsley 1970: 407 (lect.); Breuning 1971: 315; Chemsak et al. 1992: 114 (checklist); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 184 (checklist); Monné 1994: 27 (cat.); Noguera and Chemsak 1996: 404 (distr.); Martins and Galileo 2003: 374 (syn.); Turnbow et al. 2003: 20 (distr.); Monné 2005: 280 (cat.); Monné and Hovore 2006: 223 (checklist); Hovore 2006: 375 (distr.); Swift et al. 2010: 49 (distr.); Noguera and Gutiérrez 2016: 660 (distr.); Monné 2018: 382 (cat.). Syn. nov.
Tautoclines leucostigma View in CoL ; Lameere 1883: 57 (cat.).
Adetus venezuelensis Breuning 1942: 139 View in CoL ; 1960: 181 (cat.); 1971: 315; Monné and Giesbert 1994: 185 (checklist); Monné 1994: 32 (cat.); Lingafelter et al. 2014: 359 (holotype).
According to Bates (1880): “It is difficult by description to make clear the differences between this species and A. binotatus , the colour and markings being very similar. The two, however, are very distinct. A. leucostigma is a decidedly narrower insect and is covered with coarser pubescence; the elytra are more gradually attenuated posteriorly, and the seriated punctures are more oblong.” However, at least two differences (sculpturing and pubescence) pointed out by Bates (1880), to separate A. leucostigma ( Fig. 1 View Figures 1–13 ) from A. binotatus ( Fig. 3 View Figures 1–13 ), are intraspecifically highly variable. Furthermore, comparison of the pubescence in photographs of the holotypes ( Fig. 1 View Figures 1–13 , and 3 respectively), does not indicate any visible differences. This can also be said for their body shape. Accordingly, we consider A. leucostigma to be a junior synonym of A. binotatus .
Lingafelter et al. (2014) reported the existence of a specimen in the collection of USNM with a primary type label of Adetus venezuelensis and commented: “ Adetus venezuelensis Breuning 1942 . The holotype is deposited in the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France.” Examination of photograph of that species ( Fig. 6 View Figures 1–13 ) indicates it is a specimen of A. modestus Melzer, 1934 . Gérard L. Tavakilian (personal communication) said that the holotype of A. venezuelensis ( Fig. 2 View Figures 1–13 ) really is in MNHN. We confirm that the synonymy between A. leucostigma and A. venezuelensis , established by Martins and Galileo (2003), is correct.
Known geographical distribution ( Monné 2018). Mexico (Veracruz, Jalisco), Guatemala, Belize, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Venezuela.
Material examined. MEXICO, Chiapas ( New state record): 1 km S Ocosingo, 1 male, 3.VII.1986, J.E. Wappes col. ( ACMT) ; 1 km W Ocosingo , 1 male, 10.IX–1.X.1986, J. Wappes col. ( ACMT) ; Sumidero Cyn. , 1 female 28.IX-4.X.1986, J. Wappes col. ( ACMT) ; 2 km S. Chicoasén (Rd to Mirador ), 1 male 18.VI.1989, H. Howden col. ( ACMT). Guerrero (New state record): 2–3 km W 95 on 200, Viente Dos, 1 female, 15–16.IX.1989, J.E. Wappes col. ( ACMT). Tamaulipas (New state record): 16 mi E Ocampo, 1 female, 26.X.1979, J. E. Wappes col ( ACMT) ; Gomez Farias (1000′), 3 males, 8.V.1994, J.E. Wappes col ( ACMT). Jalisco: Chamela Estn. UNAM, 1 male, 2-3.X.1992, J.E. Wappes col ( ACMT) ; 7 km N Malacque, 1 female, 16–19.VII.1990, J.E. Wappes col ( ACMT). Quintana Roo (New state record): 16–24 km N San Felipe Carrillo Puerto, 1 male, 1 female, 27.V–1.VI.1984, J.E. Wappes col. ( ACMT). Veracruz: Pala Sola , 1 female, 25.X.1979, Wappes col. ( ACMT) ; Puenta Nacional , 1 female, 25.X.1979, Wappes col. ( ACMT) . COSTA RICA, Guanacaste: Great Swamp, 1 male, no date and collector indicated ( MZSP). San José: La Caja , 1 male, no date indicated, Schmidt col. ( MZSP) . PANAMA, Herrera: Parque Sarigua (7.5 km NW La Arena), 1 female, 22.VI.1996, Gillogly and Schaffner col. ( ACMT). Coclé: El Valle (700 m), 1 female, 17.VII.1976, W.E. Clark col. ( USNM) . VENEZUELA, Apure: San Fernando de Apure, 1 female, 3.I.1960, Bordon col. ( MZSP) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Apomecynini |
Genus |
Adetus binotatus ( Thomson, 1868 )
Santos-Silva, Antonio, Nascimento, Francisco E. de L. & Wappes, James E. 2019 |
Adetus venezuelensis
Lingafelter, S. W. & E. H. Nearns & G. L. Tavakilian & M. A. Monne & M. Biondi 2014: 359 |
Monne, M. A. & E. F. Giesbert 1994: 185 |
Monne, M. A. 1994: 32 |
Breuning 1971: 315 |
Breuning 1960: 181 |
Breuning 1942: 139 |
Tautoclines leucostigma
Lameere, A. A. 1883: 57 |
Adetus binotatus
Monne, M. A. 2018: 279 |
Swift, I. P. & L. G. Bezark & E. H. Nearns & A. Solis & F. T. Hovore 2010: 49 |
Maes, J. - M. & E. Berghe & D. Dauber & A. Audureau & E. Nearns & F. Skillman & D. Heffern & M. A. Monne 2010: 80 |
Audureau 2008: 14 |
Monne, M. A. 2005: 277 |
Turnbow, R. H. & R. D. Cave & M. C. Thomas 2003: 20 |
Maes, J. - M. 1998: 912 |
Noguera, F. A. & J. A. Chemsak 1996: 404 |
Monne, M. A. & E. F. Giesbert 1994: 184 |
Monne, M. A. 1994: 25 |
Maes, J. - M. & A. Allen & M. A. Monne & F. T. Hovore 1994: 29 |
Chemsak 1992: 114 |
Breuning 1971: 314 |
Breuning 1960: 181 |
Blackwelder 1946: 596 |
Aurivillius 1922: 289 |
Bates 1885: 342 |
Bates 1880: 107 |
Adetus leucostigma
Monne, M. A. 2018: 382 |
Noguera, F. A. & N. Gutierrez 2016: 660 |
Swift, I. P. & L. G. Bezark & E. H. Nearns & A. Solis & F. T. Hovore 2010: 49 |
Hovore, F. T. 2006: 223 |
Hovore 2006: 375 |
Monne, M. A. 2005: 280 |
Galileo, M. H. M. & U. R. Martins 2003: 374 |
Turnbow, R. H. & R. D. Cave & M. C. Thomas 2003: 20 |
Noguera, F. A. & J. A. Chemsak 1996: 404 |
Monne, M. A. & E. F. Giesbert 1994: 184 |
Monne, M. A. 1994: 27 |
Chemsak 1992: 114 |
Breuning 1971: 315 |
Chemsak and Linsley 1970: 407 |
Breuning 1960: 181 |
Blackwelder 1946: 596 |
Aurivillius 1922: 289 |
Bates 1885: 342 |
Bates 1880: 108 |
Tautoclines binotata
Bates 1880: |
Thomson, J. 1878: 11 |
Bates 1872: 234 |
Thomson, J. 1868: 155 |