Scopelocheirus Spence Bate, 1857
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.2201-4349.75.2023.1896 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4D6DB3DB-D3F4-4E3E-9BA0-494EFA4CCFF4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10413460 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FD4D879B-FFF7-AE14-EEB3-F9441B0DF859 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Scopelocheirus Spence Bate, 1857 |
status |
|
Scopelocheirus Spence Bate, 1857 View in CoL
Callisoma O. G. Costa, 1838: 5 View in CoL (nomen nudum)—A. Costa, 1851: 1 (homonym, Coleoptera ).— Lilljeborg, 1865a: 33.— Lilljeborg, 1865b: 23.— Heller, 1866: 26.— Boeck, 1871: 101.— Boeck, 1872: 131.—G. O. Sars, 1890: 52.— Della Valle, 1893: 838.
Scopelocheirus Spence Bate, 1857: 138 View in CoL .—Stebbing, 1906: 61.— Chevreux & Fage, 1925: 54.—Stephensen, 1929: 64.—Schellenberg, 1942: 110.— Gurjanova, 1951: 241.—J. L. Barnard, 1969: 362.— Lincoln, 1979: 50.— Diviacco & Ruffo, 1989: 542.— Barnard & Karaman, 1991: 528, 434 (key), 454 (key).
Diagnosis. Mandible lacinia mobilis a stemmed, distally expanded, irregularly cusped blade; palp article 2 broadened. Maxilla 2 inner plate slightly longer than outer; outer plate without long distally barbed slender setae. Gnathopod 1 coxa margins diverging distally. Pereopod 5 slightly wider than long; basis greatly expanded posteriorly (after Kilgallen & Lowry, 2015).
Type species. Scopelocheirus crenatus Spence Bate, 1857 View in CoL .
Included species. S. crenatus Spence Bate, 1857 View in CoL , S. hopei View in CoL (Costa in Hope, 1851), S. polymedus Bellan-Santini, 1985 View in CoL , S. sossi sp. nov.
Remarks. Until the revision of the scopelocheirid amphipods by Kilgallen & Lowry (2015), Scopelocheirus crenatus Spence Bate, 1857 was treated by many authors as a junior synonym of S. hopei (Costa in Hope, 1851). However, as these names have been recorded many times in the literature and appear common in the north-east Atlantic and Mediterranean, the result is a confused synonymy. As noted by Kilgallen & Lowry (2015) the issue is still not sufficiently resolved, as this will require an extensive, detailed study of materials from the type localities and known distributions of both species. This is beyond the scope of this study.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Scopelocheirus Spence Bate, 1857
Zettler, Michael L., Bastrop, Ralf & Lowry, James K. 2023 |
Scopelocheirus
Barnard, J. L. & G. S. Karaman 1991: 528 |
Diviacco, G. & S. Ruffo 1989: 542 |
Lincoln, R. J. 1979: 50 |
Barnard, J. L. 1969: 362 |
Gurjanova, E. F. 1951: 241 |
Chevreux, E. & L. Fage 1925: 54 |
Callisoma O. G. Costa, 1838: 5
Della Valle, A. 1893: 838 |
Boeck, A. 1872: 131 |
Boeck, A. 1871: 101 |
Heller, C. 1866: 26 |
Lilljeborg, W. 1865: 33 |
Lilljeborg, W. 1865: 23 |
Costa, A. 1851: 1 |
Costa, O. G. 1838: 5 |