NOTHRIDAE
publication ID |
ORI111 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6285525 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FB748FEF-6992-D49E-580C-87271DA98E3F |
treatment provided by |
Thomas |
scientific name |
NOTHRIDAE |
status |
|
NOTHRIDAE View in CoL Berlese, 1885
Grandjean (1954) separated the genus Nothrus from the Camisiidae , and consequently created a family Nothridae . This family is distinctly different from the Camisiidae by the following characters: the notogastral hair f1 is present in all stages; there is neotrichy of the epimeres; there are only 2 pairs of adoral hairs; there is no genital neotrichy; the aggenital hairs appear to be absent. Sellnick and Forsslund (1955) still classified the genus Nothrus with the Camisiidae .
Some misunderstanding has arisen about the names of the two families. The name Nothridae was originally created by Berlese (1885c, p. 5; 1885a, p. 126); Oudemans (1900a) emended it into Camisiidae . Berlese (1896b) enumerated the following heterogeneous collection of genera as representatives of the Nothridae : Ameronothrus , Hermannia , Neoliodes , Angelia , Nothrus , and Hypochthonius . Although Berlese (1885a) used the name Angelia in the sense of the modern Nothrus conception, and Nothrus in the sense of Camisia , Berlese must be considered the author of the name Nothridae . Below, the nomenclatorial reasons for the present use of the name Nothrus are dealt with.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
InfraOrder |
Enarthronota |
SuperFamily |
Perlohmannoidea |
Family |