Trissolcus utahensis (Ashmead), 1893

Ganjisaffar, Fatemeh, Talamas, Elijah J., Bon, Marie Claude & Perring, Thomas M., 2020, First report and integrated analysis of two native Trissolcus species utilizing Bagrada hilaris eggs in California, Journal of Hymenoptera Research 80, pp. 49-70 : 49

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.80.57024

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6DE3A894-CDFC-4D3C-946E-25E492C4C851

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F79E4032-CE46-5575-AE30-21F71C244800

treatment provided by

Journal of Hymenoptera Research by Pensoft

scientific name

Trissolcus utahensis (Ashmead)
status

 

Trissolcus utahensis (Ashmead)

Remarks.

The concept of Trissolcus utahensis was most recently treated in a revisionary context by Johnson (1985). This treatment separated T. utahensis from T. cosmopeplae based on the length of the anteroventral extension of the metapleuron, the absence of a genal carina, the shape of the gena in lateral view, and if notauli could be distinguished from the surface sculpture of the posterior mesoscutum. These characters were used again in the key to Nearctic Trissolcus by Talamas et al. (2015), with the addition of the form of the mesoscutal humeral sulcus, which was treated as variable within T. cosmopeplae . Talamas et al. (2015) also treated the anteroventral extension of the metapleuron as variable within T. cosmopeplae and emphasized the shape of the gena in lateral view to separate these species. This modification to the key sought to reconcile variability in the shape of the gena with other, seemingly variable characters. The shape of the gena has proven to be one of the more difficult characters to interpret because there is not a discrete boundary between “narrow” and “bulging”. Because the variation in these characters does not correspond to clades in our phylogeny, we treat them as intraspecifically variable and the T. utahensis clade as a single species (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ). Based on the morphological analysis provided below we propose the following replacement for couplet 14 in Talamas et al. (2015):

14 Anteroventral extension of the metapleuron long, extending to base of mesocoxa (Fig. 6 View Figures 6–7 ); mesoscutal humeral sulcus comprised of cells (Figs 6-7 View Figures 6–7 ) T. cosmopeplae (Gahan)
- Anteroventral extension of the metapleuron short, not approaching base of mesocoxa (Figs 12 View Figures 12–15 - 19 View Figures 16–19 ); mesoscutal humeral sulcus indicated by a smooth furrow (Figs 20-22 View Figures 20–22 ) T. utahensis (Ashmead)

Sculpture of the dorsal frons.

Figs 8-11 View Figures 8–11 illustrate variation in the size of the smooth area directly below the preocellar pit, and the striation that radiates from the antennal scrobe. Fig. 8 View Figures 8–11 illustrates a specimen that emerged from a B. hilaris egg. As was found in T. basalis , specimens that developed in B. hilaris eggs have reduced sculpture relative to those that developed in other hosts ( Ganjisaffar et al. 2018). The specimens in Figs 9 View Figures 8–11 , 11 View Figures 8–11 were both reared from the eggs of P. maculiventris in British Columbia, and have identical COI barcode sequences, yet the size of smooth area on the dorsal frons differs between them. The specimen in Fig. 11 View Figures 8–11 is the largest (1.35 mm) among these, and the specimen in Fig. 8 View Figures 8–11 is the smallest (0.93 mm). The specimens in Figs 9 View Figures 8–11 , 10 View Figures 8–11 have the smooth area on the frons about equal in size and these specimens are also approximately equal in length (1.11 and 1.07 mm, respectively). These two specimens were retrieved in different haplogroups (clades 1 and 4), and we thus postulate that sculptural differences on the frons are size dependent.

Variation on the gena.

The shape of the gena varies between and within the four clades of T. utahensis . In clades 1 and 3, the specimens have a rather narrow gena, and in clades 2 and 4 the gena is moderately to distinctly bulging in lateral view. Figs 12-15 View Figures 12–15 , 24 View Figures 23–25 and 27 View Figures 26–29 illustrate this variation. The degree to which the gena is bulging in lateral view does not appear to be host or size related. Specimens reared from B. hilaris eggs are the smallest and have the gena moderately (Fig. 12 View Figures 12–15 ) to distinctly (Fig. 24 View Figures 23–25 ) bulging. The specimens with the most distinctly bulging gena (clade 4, Figs 15 View Figures 12–15 , 19 View Figures 16–19 ) and the narrowest gena (clade 3, Figs 27 View Figures 26–29 , 28 View Figures 26–29 ) were both reared from eggs of P. maculiventris and the specimens are larger than those reared from B. hilaris eggs.

Specimens with a bulging gena tend not to have the genal carina indicated, whereas specimens with a narrow gena often have it clearly expressed, but this is not an exact correlation. The specimen in Figs 12 View Figures 12–15 , 16 View Figures 16–19 has a moderately bulging gena and the genal carina is distinctly present.

Microsculpture on the poster gena is less developed in specimens reared from B. hilaris eggs (Fig. 12 View Figures 12–15 ), and this area is noticeably smoother than in specimens reared from P. maculiventris eggs (Figs 13-15 View Figures 12–15 ). This phenomenon is consistent with a general pattern of reduced sculpture in smaller specimens.

Occipital carina.

Tortorici et al. (2019) presented a new character to distinguish T. semistriatus (Nees von Esenbeck) from closely related species: the form of the occipital carina in dorsal view. In most species of Trissolcus the occipital carina is evenly convex, but in a few species, including T. semistriatus and T. utahensis , the occipital carina forms a distinct angle and the vertex of this angle may have a short carina directed toward the median ocellus (Figs 5 View Figure 4–5 , 22 View Figures 20–22 ). In some specimens that emerged from B. hilaris eggs, the vertex of the angle formed by the occipital carina is less sharp, perhaps due to its diminutive size (Fig. 25 View Figures 23–25 ). The occipital carina is not visible in the available images of T. cosmopeplae , and it is obscured by glue in the holotype specimen of T. utahensis . This character deserves further attention in Nearctic Trissolcus although we are not presently able to determine if it can separate T. cosmopeplae and T. utahensis .

Notaulus.

Specimens of T. utahensis reared from both B. hilaris and P. maculiventris have the notaulus indicated by short, shallow grooves present at the posterior margin of the mesoscutum (Figs 5 View Figure 4–5 , 20-22 View Figures 20–22 ). These are visible in the holotype of T. utahensis (see fig. 100 in Talamas et al. (2015)), and they have the same form in the holotype of T. cosmopeplae (Fig. 7 View Figures 6–7 ). Based on re-examination of images of the types and the specimens at hand, we conclude that this character does not separate these species.

Mesoscutal humeral sulcus.

The form of the mesoscutal humeral sulcus was used by Tortorici et al. (2019) to separate very similar Palearctic Trissolcus species. This sulcus is clearly indicated by cells in the holotype of T. cosmopeplae (Figs 6 View Figures 6–7 , 7 View Figures 6–7 ) and it is present as a smooth furrow in all specimens of T. utahensis that we have examined (Figs 5 View Figure 4–5 , 20-21 View Figures 20–22 ), including the holotype.

Anteroventral extension of the metapleuron.

The length of this structure, reaching to the mesocoxa in T. cosmopeplae (Fig. 6 View Figures 6–7 ) and very short in T. utahensis (Figs 12 View Figures 12–15 - 19 View Figures 16–19 ), was the first character listed in the couplet that separates these species in Johnson (1985). Our analysis of specimens in this study lends weight to the reliability of this character.

Color.

Most species in Trissolcus have a black metasoma. The most notable exception is a Palearctic species, T. rufiventris Mayr, in which T2-T7 vary from bright yellow to dark brown. The specimens reared from B. hilaris eggs have T2-T7 notably lighter in color than the head and mesosoma (Figs 20 View Figures 20–22 , 25 View Figures 23–25 ), and the body overall is lighter in color than in specimens reared from P. maculiventris eggs (compare Fig. 8 View Figures 8–11 to Figs 9-11 View Figures 8–11 , Fig. 12 View Figures 12–15 to Figs 13-15 View Figures 12–15 ).

The most obvious color variation in T. utahensis is in the legs. Specimens that parasitized B. hilaris eggs have legs that are pale brown to orange distal to the coxae (clades 1, 2; Figs 12 View Figures 12–15 , 24 View Figures 23–25 ). Brightly colored legs were found in T. utahensis that emerged from P. maculiventris eggs (clade 3, Fig. 29 View Figures 26–29 ), although the clear majority of specimens reared from P. maculiventris eggs in British Columbia had dark brown legs. Interestingly, FSCA 00033239, with pale brown legs, in clade 1 is sister to FSCA 00000320, with dark brown legs. The antennae vary in color in accordance with the legs, although the variation is less pronounced and ranges from medium to dark brown. These data do not indicate that T. utahensis exhibits a direct correlation of appendage color with host, size, or lineage.

Material Examined.

11 females, FSCA 00091859, 00091872, 00094741-00094749, USA: CA: 33.99105N, 117.33360W, roadside mustard weeds, ex. Bagrada hilaris sentinel eggs deployed 6-9.IV.2018, parasitoids emerged 22-23.IV.2018, Coll. F. Ganjisaffar GoogleMaps ; 1 female, FSCA 00033239, USA: CA: UC Riverside Agricultural Operations , 33.96611N, 117.34230W, squash field with mustard weeds, ex: Bagrada hilaris sentinel eggs deployed 12-16-X-2018; parasitoid emerged 27-28-X-2018, Coll. F. Ganjisaffar GoogleMaps ; 9 females, 2 males, CANADA, BC, Penticton , reared from Podisus maculiventris , JUN-AUG-2017, Coll. W. Wong & P. Abram. Egg mass #181: FSCA 00094713-00094715, 00033042-00033043; Egg mass #144: FSCA 00000302; Egg mass #160: FSCA 00094712; Egg mass #92: 00033044-00033045; Egg mass #102; FSCA 00033040-00033041 . 1 female, FSCA 00094711, CANADA, BC, Kelowna , reared from Podisus maculiventris , 23.V.2017, Coll. W. Wong & P. Abram. Egg mass #171.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Scelionidae

Genus

Trissolcus