Formica piniphila SCHENCK, 1852
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25849/myrmecol.news_031:133 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5587859 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F52B87F6-5E25-6152-FC9F-DB2EFA101A39 |
treatment provided by |
Donat |
scientific name |
Formica piniphila SCHENCK, 1852 |
status |
|
Formica piniphila SCHENCK, 1852 View in CoL
Formica piniphila SCHENCK, 1852 View in CoL [description and zoogeography]
This taxon was described from Hessen-Nassau. Types were not available. SCHENCK (1852) reported for the worker “mesosoma always homogenously covered by setae, eyes bare, mesosoma with two small, pale blackish spots, the latter often missing” and for the gyne “scutellum and gaster brilliantly shiny.” As SCHENCK (1852) correctly described differential characters of Formica polyctena , Formica pratensis , and Formica truncorum and because no other Formica rufa group species are expectable for Hessen-Nassau, the synonymy with F. rufa is obvious.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Formica piniphila SCHENCK, 1852
Seifert, Bernhard 2021 |
Formica piniphila SCHENCK, 1852
Schenck 1852 |