Cremnomymar sagittifer (Fidalgo), 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5463.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77985F48-0E6A-4D2C-9D09-DFF1138DB673 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11627082 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F4708794-BC12-FFE7-FF77-F989FF00FCAF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2024-06-12 08:22:31, last updated 2024-11-27 07:38:38) |
scientific name |
Cremnomymar sagittifer (Fidalgo) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Cremnomymar sagittifer (Fidalgo) , comb. n.
( Figs 23–35 View FIGURES 21–24 View FIGURES 25–28 View FIGURES 29–31 View FIGURES 32–35 )
Parapolynema sagittifer Fidalgo 1982: 98–101 View in CoL . Type locality: José C. Paz, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Subsequent references: De Santis 1989: 73 (catalog); Yoshimoto 1990: 67 (list); Fidalgo 1991: 152 (additions to diagnosis, comparison with P. tucumanum , distribution), 155 (illustrations); Loiácono et al. 2005: 15 (type series information); Luft Albarracin et al. 2009: 11 (list), 20–21 (illustrations); Luft Albarracin et al. 2014: 137 (list).
Type material examined. Holotype female and the entire paratype series of both sexes [MLPA, as in Figs 23–24 View FIGURES 21–24 and 32–33 View FIGURES 32–35 ], as listed in Fidalgo (1982, p. 101) and Loiácono et al. (2005, p. 15), as well as additional (non-type) material in MLPA listed in Fidalgo (1991, p. 132).
Additional material examined. ARGENTINA. Buenos Aires: Castelar, INTA, 34°36’20’’S 58°40’33’’W, 22 m, 6.xi–6.xii.2006, G.A. Logarzo [1 ♀, UCRC]. GoogleMaps Luján , agricultural field at Universidad Nacional de Luján , 34°35’07’’S 59°04’45’’W, 31 m, C.E. Coviella: 17.iii.2005 [1 ♂, UCRC]; GoogleMaps 31.iii.2006 [1 ♀, UCRC]; GoogleMaps 1.ix.2006 [1 ♀, UCRC]; GoogleMaps 20.x.2006 [6 ♀, UCRC]; GoogleMaps 2006 (no exact date) [1 ♀, UCRC] GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. In addition to the female features mentioned in the key, C. sagittifer differs from C. fidalgoi , to which it is most similar, in the male having a distinct, complete or almost complete median carina on the propodeum (males of C. fidalgoi without such a carina).
Redescription (type and non-type specimens from Buenos Aires). FEMALE. Body length (dry-mounted specimens, as in Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–28 ) 720–790 µm. Head dark brown and the rest of body brown to dark brown except petiole light brown ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–28 ), gaster often somewhat lighter than mesosoma; scape and pedicel light brown, funicle light brown or brown, and clava dark brown; legs including procoxa mostly light brown. Head ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25–28 ) a little wider than high; face with fine, inconspicuous mesh-like sculpture above toruli. Antenna ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–28 ) with scape, excluding short radicle (not fused with the rest of scape), 3.1–3.5× as long as wide; pedicel slightly longer than any funicle segment and about 1.8× as long as wide; all funicle segments short, F1 (and sometimes F4 or F5) the shortest and F2 the longest, F6 the widest and without mps; clava 2.2–2.4× as long as wide, a little longer than combined length of the 3 preceding segments, with all mps in apical half. Mesosoma ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25–28 ) 1.4–1.5× as long as wide; pronotum, mesoscutum and scutellum with reticulate mesh-like sculpture; mesoscutum much wider than long, with notauli indistinct; scutellum longer than mesoscutum; propodeum mostly smooth (except for the lateral carinae), without median carina. Fore wing ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 29–31 ) 3.0–3.5× as long as wide; marginal + stigmal vein with 2 very short, weak macrochaetae, apical process about as long as marginal + stigmal vein to notably longer than marginal + stigmal vein ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 29–31 ); disc with 2 wide transverse bands beyond venation, the proximal band about as wide as the distal one, densely setose beyond venation, the majority of discal setae (those on dark bands) modified; most fringe setae on anterior margin thickened, the basal ones short and subapical and apical ones long while apical ones not as thickened as subapical fringe setae; the longest marginal seta 0.8–0.95× greatest width of wing. Hind wing ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 29–31 ) 35–40× as long as wide, with disc slightly infumate (except basally) and sparsely setose beyond venation; the longest marginal seta 10–14× greatest width of wing. Metacoxa smooth. Petiole ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–31 ) cylindrical, with wrinkles dorsally. Ovipositor 0.8–0.85 length of gaster ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–31 ), not exserted beyond gastral apex, and 0.85–0.9× length of metatibia.
MALE. Body length (dry-mounted specimen, Fig. 34 View FIGURES 32–35 ) 660 µm. Similar to female in color except scape and pedicel light brown, and flagellum uniformly brown. Propodeum with a complete or almost complete median carina.
Distribution. Argentina: Buenos Aires ( Fidalgo 1982), and possibly Brazil (I have seen one unidentified female of a Cremnomymar sp. from São Paulo State that is likely C. sagittifer , although no positive identification has been made).
De Santis, L. (1989) Catalogo de los himenopteros calcidoideos (Hymenoptera) al sur de los Estados Unidos. Segundo suplemento. Catalogue of the Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) of America south of the United States. Second supplement. Acta Entomologica Chilena, 15, 9 - 89.
Fidalgo, A. P. (1982) Sobre un nuevo genero y especie de mimarido de Argentina (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina, 41 (1 - 4), 97 - 102.
Fidalgo, P. (1991 [1990]) Sobre Parapolynema Fidalgo, 1982, con descripcion de una nueva especie (Hymenoptera; Mymaridae). Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina, 49 (1 - 4), 151 - 155.
Loiacono, M. S., Diaz, N. B., Margaria, C. B. & Gallardo, F. E. (2005) Los tipos de Mymaridae y Mymarommatidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea y Mymarommatoidea) depositados en el Museo de La Plata, Argentina. Revista del Museo de La Plata, Publicacion Tecnica y Didactica, 48, 1 - 20.
Luft Albarracin, E., Triapitsyn, S. V. & Virla, E. G. (2009) Annotated key to the genera of Mymaridae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) in Argentina. Zootaxa, 2129 (1), 1 - 28. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2129.1.1
Luft Albarracin, E., Aquino, D. & Triapitsyn, S. V. (2014) Mymaridae. In: Roig-Junent, S., Claps, L. E. & Morrone, J. J. (Directores), Biodiversidad de artropodos argentinos volumen 4. INSUE - UNT Ediciones, Instituto Superior de Entomologia Dr. Abraham Willink , Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, San Miguel de Tucuman, pp. 127 - 138.
Yoshimoto, C. M. (1990) A review of the genera of New World Mymaridae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Flora & Fauna Handbook No. 7. Sandhill Crane Press, Inc., Gainesville, Florida, 176 pp. [pp. v - ix + 1 - 166]
FIGURES 21–24. 21–22. Cremnomymar nahuelbutae sp. n., female (holotype). 21. Fore wing. 22. Hind wing. 23–24. Cremnomymar sagittifer, female (paratype of Parapolynema sagittifer, José C. Paz, Buenos Aires, Argentina). 23. Slide. 24. Habitus.
FIGURES 25–28. Cremnomymar sagittifer, female (Luján, Buenos Aires, Argentina). 25. Habitus. 26. Antenna. 27. Head, frontal. 28. Mesosoma.
FIGURES 29–31. Cremnomymar sagittifer, female (Luján, Buenos Aires, Argentina). 29. Fore wing base. 30. Metasoma, lateral. 31. Wings.
UCRC |
University of California, Riverside |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cremnomymar sagittifer (Fidalgo)
Triapitsyn, Serguei V. 2024 |
Parapolynema sagittifer
Luft Albarracin, E. & Aquino, D. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 2014: 137 |
Luft Albarracin, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. & Virla, E. G. 2009: 11 |
Loiacono, M. S. & Diaz, N. B. & Margaria, C. B. & Gallardo, F. E. 2005: 15 |
Fidalgo, P. 1991: 152 |
Yoshimoto, C. M. 1990: 67 |
De Santis, L. 1989: 73 |
Fidalgo, A. P. 1982: 101 |