Stelis ater (Hall and Ascher, 2010)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/3707.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5454890 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F43FE67B-C615-A624-FDEC-4C702D21FEDC |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Stelis ater |
status |
|
EGG/MATURE OOCYTE
Figures 35 View FIGURES 35–40 , 73, 76, 77 View FIGURES 73–77
DIAGNOSIS: Eggs/mature oocytes have been described for Stelis elongativentris ( Rozen, 1987) and S. (Stelis) murina Pérez ( Rozen and Kamel, 2009) . Those of S. ater are remarkably similar in color and shape, all characterized by their shortness relative to maximum diameters, rounded front ends, and slightly more narrowly rounded posterior ends. Of the three species, those of S. ater are the longest.
Eggs of Stelis ater can be immediately distinguished from those of the host by shape and size. Those of Osmia chalybea are substantially longer, and their maximum diameter is posterior to midbody as seen in lateral view (figs. 70, 71) rather than at the midbody as in S. ater (fig. 72).
DESCRIPTION: Length 2.2–2.4 mm; maximum width 0.88–0.98 mm (N = 5) at approximate midbody. Shape slightly curved with ventral surface flat to slightly concave in lateral view; anterior end broadly rounded in lateral view; maximum breadth at midbody with posterior half tapering to slightly more narrowly round posterior end in lateral view (fig. 72); micropyle a disc (fig. 77) surrounded by converging ridges on normally curved surface of front of egg at anterior pole (fig. 76) not visible under stereomicroscope; apparent absence of pores not understood. Egg color translucent whitish; chorion under stereoscope clear, shiny, glassy. Under SEM examination chorion featureless except for micropylar area.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.