Pseudostegodera Wu & Chen, 2021

Chen, Zhe-Yu, Lyu, Zhi-Tong & Wu, Min, 2021, Systematic revision of Stegodera Martens, 1876 (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Camaenidae), with description of a new genus, ZooKeys 1059, pp. 1-21 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1059.68385

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:650D7F4C-990E-4CBF-88E3-F0CD38EEC377

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F0A6D222-8DB2-4B57-8910-17CAAE2B7FFA

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:F0A6D222-8DB2-4B57-8910-17CAAE2B7FFA

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Pseudostegodera Wu & Chen
status

gen. nov.

Pseudostegodera Wu & Chen View in CoL gen. nov.

Type species.

Pseudostegodera qiului gen. et sp. nov.

Diagnosis.

Shell sinistral. Apical whorls with dense fine ribs gradually becoming granules. The last 1/8 to 1/4 body whorl compressed, only partly covering penultimate whorl. Umbilicus broad. Head wart absent. Each side of mantle edge with a leaf-shaped appendage. Penis sheath present. Penis externally simple. Epiphallic papilla absent. Flagellum present. Dart sac apparatus absent.

Remarks.

Conchologically the new genus can be distinguished from Stegodera by the detached body whorl and penultimate whorl. The new genus is supported to be the closest relative of a clade containing Stegodera + Nesiohelix as based on the Maximum Likelihood/Baysian Inference phylogeny shown in Fig. 1A View Figure 1 . However, when the Australian camaenids were included in the analysis, the relationships between the new genus, Stegodera + Nesiohelix , and all remaining taxa except Satsuma remained unresolved (Fig. 1B View Figure 1 ). The new genus is conchologically similar to Stegodera , however, it differs in certain reproductive characters (see above). We consider that the genital anatomy is more informative than shell features in helicoid systematics (e.g., Criscione and Köhler 2013). In addition, the loss of the dart sac apparatus in Bradybaeninae and/or Camaeninae is not a frequent event during the evolution of Camaenidae (Fig. 1B View Figure 1 ). Based on these two considerations, we consider it is reasonable to distinguish this new camaenid taxon as a monotypic genus represented by the new species described below.