LIMIDAE Rafinesque, 1815
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2024v46a16 |
|
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1D016A8E-8715-4D6C-B999-29F6F4947911 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EF5DBD3E-FF76-CCD3-FC7F-17A9FDE8F94F |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
LIMIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 |
| status |
|
Family LIMIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 View in CoL
Cystia – Deshayes, 1844-DictUniv4: 562, ex Renier. This name was proposed by Renier (1807), in a work placed on the Official Index (ICZN Opinion 427, 1956b). Its republication by Deshayes, who did not treat is as valid, did not make it available.
bullifera View in CoL , Lima View in CoL – Deshayes, 1863: 30-31, pl. 4, figs 9-10. — Type locality: La Réunion. — Type age: Recent. — Current status: Lima bullifera Deshayes, 1863 View in CoL ( Huber 2010a: 633; Boutet et al. 2020: 607).
caillati View in CoL , Lima View in CoL – Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 5-8; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 66-67. — Type locality: Thiverval-Grignon. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). — Type material: UCBL-EM 35346, holotype. — Current status: Lima (Ctenoides) caillati Deshayes, 1858 View in CoL ( Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 84; Pacaud 2008: 83).
cordiformis View in CoL , Lima View in CoL – Deshayes,1832-EncyMeth: 348-349;1836-HistNatAnim2: 123; 1843-HistNatAnim3: 48-49. — Type locality: Germany. — Type age: Muschelkalk, Triassic. — Current status: taxon inquirendum .
diastropha View in CoL , Lima View in CoL –Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 12- 13; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 66. — Type locality: Parnes. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). — Current status: Lima (Ctenoides) diastropha Deshayes, 1858 View in CoL ( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 50; Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 84; Pacaud 2008: 83).
dujardinii , Lima View in CoL – Deshayes, 1832-EncyMeth: 353; 1836-HistNatAnim2: 121; 1843-HistNatAnim3: 47-48. — Type locality: Tours. — Type age: Cretaceous (Turonian). — Current status: Lima dujardinii Deshayes, 1832 ( Dhondt, 1985: 46).
flabelloides View in CoL , Lima View in CoL – Deshayes, 1830-DescrCoqFoss: 296, 22, pl. 43, figs 6-8; 1832-EncyMeth: 347-348;1836-HistNatAnim2: 119-120; 1843-HistNatAnim3: 47;1860-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 14-15; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 65. — Type locality: Valmondois. — Type age: Eocene (Bartonian). — Current status: Lima (Ctenoides) flabelloides Deshayes, 1858 View in CoL ( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 50; Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 83).
lunularis, Lima View in CoL – Deshayes, 1832-EncyMeth: 349; 1836-HistNatAnim2: 122; 1839-RegAnim: pl. 77, fig. 3, 3a-b, as Plagiostoma View in CoL ; 1843-HistNatAnim3: 48; 1850- TraitElem: 29, pl. 47, figs 18- 19. — Type localities: Caen & Bayeux. — Type age: Jurassic (Bajocian). — Type material: UCBL-EM 35334, syntype. Recorded from the Jurassic of Great Britain (H. B. Woodward 1894: 562) .
pretiosa , Lima View in CoL –Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 16-19; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 64-65. — Type localities:Thiverval-Grignon & Chaumont-en-Vexin. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). — Current status: Lima (Ctenoides) pretiosa Deshayes, 1858 View in CoL ( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 51; Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 83; Pacaud 2008: 83).
rara View in CoL , Lima View in CoL – Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 9-11; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 64. — Type locality: Parnes. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). Lima (Ctenoides) rara Deshayes, 1858 View in CoL ( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 51; Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 83; Pacaud 2008: 83).
sandbergeri , Lima View in CoL –Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 23- 25; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 67-68. — Type locality: Jeure. — Type age: Oligocene (Rupelian). — Current status: Limaria (Limatulella) sandbergeri (Deshayes, 1858) ( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 49; R. Janssen 1979: 68-69; Lozouet & Maestrati 2012a: 250, 252, fig. 159: 13-14, the last two as “1861”).
sowerbyi , Lima View in CoL –Deshayes, 1863: 30, non Geinitz, 1850.Based on Lima squamosa G. B. Sowerby II, 1843 View in CoL , var. — Type locality: La Réunion.— Type age: Recent. — Current status: synonym of Lima vulgaris (Link, 1807) View in CoL [ Limaria View in CoL ] ( Huber 2010a: 228, 632; Lutaenko et al. 2019: 203).
tenuis View in CoL , Lima View in CoL –Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 20-22; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 67. — Type localities: Crouy & Le Guépelle. — Type age: Eocene (Bartonian). Limatula (Limatulella) tenuis (Deshayes, 1858) ( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 49) View in CoL . — Current status: Antarctolima tenuis (Deshayes, 1858) ( Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 84) .
uniauriculata, Lima View in CoL – Deshayes,1832-EncyMeth: 350. — Type locality: none given. — Type age:not stated. — Current status: nomen dubium .
●
comata, Lima – Leymerie, 1841: 342, nomen nudum; 1842: 10, 26, pl. 8, fig. 7a-b, ex Deshayes ms. — Type locality: Vendeuvre-sur-Barse. — Type age: Cretaceous (Hauterivian).
hoperi , Lima View in CoL – Listed by Arkadiev (2020: 29, 192, pl. 45, fig. 8) as a Deshayes species, this originated as Lima hoperi Mantell, 1822 .
pectinoides View in CoL , Lima View in CoL – Deshayes, 1850-TraitElem: 29, pl. 48, fig. 3. Fossil. Listed by Sherborn (1929: 4805) as a Deshayes species, this was based on Plagiostoma pectinoides J. Sowerby, 1815 View in CoL .
striata View in CoL , Lima View in CoL –Deshayes, 1850-TraitElem: 29, pl. 47, fig. 17. Listed by Sherborn (1931: 6183) as a Deshayes species, was based on Chamites striatus Schlotheim, 1813 ( Schlotheim 1813: 103), which has been variously placed in Lima View in CoL or Plagiostoma See View in CoL also Schlotheim (1820: 210-211). Both Schlotheim works cite earlier figures.
undata , Lima View in CoL – Leymerie, 1841: 342, nomen nudum; 1842: 10, 27, pl. 8, fig. 8a-b, ex Deshayes ms. — Type locality: Vendeuvre-sur-Barse. — Type age: Cretaceous (Hauterivian).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
