SOLENIDAE Lamarck, 1809
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5252/geodiversitas2024v46a16 |
|
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1D016A8E-8715-4D6C-B999-29F6F4947911 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EF5DBD3E-FF23-CC87-FEC4-12BDFCDBFC29 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
SOLENIDAE Lamarck, 1809 |
| status |
|
Family SOLENIDAE Lamarck, 1809 View in CoL
angustus View in CoL , Solen View in CoL – Deshayes, 1856-DescrCoqFoss: 7, pl. 7, figs 4-6; 1857-DescrCoqFoss: 151. — Type locality: Aizy-Jouy. — Type age: Eocene (Ypresian). — Current status: Solena ( Plectosolen) angusta (Deshayes, 1856) ( Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 67) View in CoL .
burdigalensis View in CoL , Solen View in CoL – Deshayes, 1839-TraitElem-1(2): 104-105. — Type locality: Saucats. — Type age: Miocene (Burdigalian). — Type material: UCBL-EM35376, EM35377, syntypes. New species based on Solen vagina Linnaeus, 1758 View in CoL , sensu Basterot (1825: 96), non Linnaeus, 1758. — Current status: Solen burdigalensis Deshayes, 1839 View in CoL ( Lesport et al. 2019: 25-26, pl. 10, figs 5-9, text-fig. 22).
proximus , Solen View in CoL – Deshayes, 1856-DescrCoqFoss: 7, pl. 7, figs 7-9; 1857-DescrCoqFoss: 150. — Type localities: Chaumont-en-Vexin, Gomerfontaine, Brasles, Parnes, Damery, Valmondois, Auvers-sur-Oise, Mary-sur-Marne, Le Fayel, Arthon-en-Retz. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian-Bartonian). — Current status: Solena ( Plectosolen) proxima (Deshayes, 1856) View in CoL ( Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 67; Pacaud 2008: 93).
vaginalis View in CoL , Solen View in CoL – Deshayes, 1839-TraitElem-1(2): 108-109, 4, pl. 6, fig. 7; 1857-DescrCoqFoss: 152-153. — Type localities: Near Paris, near Valogne, Barton-on-Sea ( England). — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian-Bartonian). — Current status: Solena ( Plectosolen) vaginalis (Deshayes, 1839) View in CoL ( Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 67; Pacaud 2007: 29, fig. 3C, 62; Pacaud 2008: 93, all as “1843”).
●
candidus , Solecurtus View in CoL – Glibert & Van de Poel (1967: 128) noted that Solen candidus was not available from Renier, 1804, as a “ nomen nudum ” (actually an unavailable work by ICZN Opinion 316, 1954e) and proposed to credit the species to “Renier in Deshayes, 1839”). However, it had already been made available as Solen candidus Brocchi, 1814 .
siliquarius, Solen View in CoL – Dujardin, 1837: 255, ex Deshayes ms. Nomen nudum.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
SOLENIDAE Lamarck, 1809
| Coan, Eugene V., Pacaud, Jean-Michel & Kabat, Alan R. 2024 |
Solena ( Plectosolen ) angusta (Deshayes, 1856) (
| Le Renard & Pacaud 1995 |
proximus
| Glibert & Van de Poel 1967 |
Solen burdigalensis
| Deshayes 1839 |
Solecurtus
| Blainville 1824 |
burdigalensis
| Defrance 1819 |
candidus
| Brocchi 1814 |
Solen candidus
| Brocchi 1814 |
Solen candidus
| Brocchi 1814 |
Solen
| Linnaeus 1758 |
Solen
| Linnaeus 1758 |
Solen vagina
| Linnaeus 1758 |
Solen
| Linnaeus 1758 |
Solen
| Linnaeus 1758 |
Solen
| Linnaeus 1758 |
