Crematogaster delagoensis Forel
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.898.37531 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:52448626-026D-4D5B-BB75-5097E06814D7 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED48585B-08F9-5290-B731-1EBB6E2D1817 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Crematogaster delagoensis Forel |
status |
|
Crematogaster delagoensis Forel View in CoL Figure 14 A–C View Figure 14
Taxonomic history.
Crematogaster inermis r. delagoensis Forel, 1894a: 99 (w.) Mozambique.
Combination in Crematogaster (Acrocoelia) : Emery 1922: 146; in Crematogaster ( Crematogaster) : Bolton 1995: 166.
Status as species: Emery 1922: 146.
Current subspecies: C. delagoensis acutidens Arnold, C. delagoensis merwei Santschi, C. delagoensis rhodesiana Arnold.
Material examined.
KSA: Alnaifiam Farshet Shaal, 22.41559N, 46.58806E, 602 m, 12.iv.2015 (Al Dhafer et al.) (1 w, KSMA).
Geographic range.
This species was originally described from Mozambique and in the Afrotropical region seems to be restricted to Southern Africa ( Guénard et al. 2017; Janicki et al. 2017). Our material represents the first record from the KSA since the species was previously only known from Yemen and Oman ( Borowiec 2014; Collingwood and Agosti 1996; Sharaf et al. 2018) ( Fig. 11 View Figure 11 ).
Remarks.
Again, the disjunctive distribution raises some doubts about the identity of our material. Even though it is conspecific the material previously identified from Oman and Yemen, it needs to be proven that it is indeed C. delagoensis . The lack of records from East Africa and the southwestern parts of KSA could be due to insufficient sampling, but it could also be that the Arabian material is not similar to the South African “genuine” C. delagoensis .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |