Chrysophanus f. emarginata Warnecke, 1942
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.5.63435 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:984E15D8-80E0-4B7D-A84F-92BB0AD4EA73 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED335F24-5A92-5E43-BD31-890A5679A149 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Chrysophanus f. emarginata Warnecke, 1942 |
status |
|
70. Chrysophanus f. emarginata Warnecke, 1942
Original combination.
" Chrysophanus alciphron Rott., ?, n. f emarginata." Warnecke, 1942 Dt. Ent. Z. Iris 56: 103.
Current combination.
Lycaena alciphron f. emarginata (Warnecke, 1942).
Current status.
Infrasubspecific and hence unavailable name.
Original material.
Labelled as “Type” 1? (ZMH 827527) (Fig. 70 View Plate 11 ). "Schlesw. - Holst. / Kr. / Bockhorn / W. Wolf leg. / 14.7.40" // "Katalog Nr. / L 2322" // "? nf. emarginata / Warn. Type / Iris 1942, 103" // " Chrysophanus / alciphron / emarginata Warn. / Type / L.31" // " Sig. G. Warnecke / Eing. Nr. 5, 1945" // "ZMH 827527" .
Original locality.
Germany: “Segeberg”; Schleswig-Holstein publication says Segeberg; the label of the specimen treated as type by Warnecke states Lauenburg crossed out and replaced by Bockhorn.
Remarks.
Warnecke (1942) proposed this name as a form of C. alciphron (Rottemburg, 1775). According to article 45.6.1 ( ICZN 1999), it is infrasubspecific if the content of the work unambiguously reveals that the name was proposed for an infrasubspecific entity, and is hence unavailable. Already the title of Warnecke (1942) paper reveals that this form was described as an aberration and not as a subspecies.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |