Brueelia kluzi Balat , 1955
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.66.32423 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B55AC08-B6EA-4488-8850-26CB8E1A4207 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EC74B26B-4A12-48ED-D1C3-88A127622901 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Brueelia kluzi Balat , 1955 |
status |
|
Brueelia kluzi Balat, 1955 Figs 27-28 View Figures 27, 28 , 29-33 View Figures 29–33
Brueelia kluzi Balát, 1955: 512.
Type host.
Fringilla coelebs Linnaeus, 1758, chaffinch ( Fringillidae ).
Type locality.
Lednice, Czechia.
Description.
Both sexes. Head flat-dome shaped (Fig. 29 View Figures 29–33 ), lateral margins of preantennal area convex, frons rounded to slightly flattened. Marginal carina moderate in width, shallowly displaced and widened at osculum, median margin undulating. Ventral anterior plate small, shield-shaped. Head chaetotaxy and pigmentation patterns as in Figure 29 View Figures 29–33 ; head sensilla and pts not visible in examined specimens. Preantennal nodi with slight median bulge. Preocular nodi larger than post-ocular nodi. Marginal temporal carina moderate in width, undulating. Gular plate not entirely clear in examined specimens, but roughly lanceolate. Thoracic and abdominal segments and pigmentation patterns as in Figures 27 View Figures 27, 28 , 28 View Figures 27, 28 .
Male. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Figure 27 View Figures 27, 28 ; ss not visible on tergopleurite VIII in any examined male, but likely present if more specimens are examined. Basal apodeme not clearly visible in any examined males, and here illustrated approximately (Fig. 30 View Figures 29–33 ); seemingly slender, with lateral margins concave. Proximal mesosome elongated, trapezoidal with concave lateral margins (Fig. 31 View Figures 29–33 ). Mesosomal lobes broad, highly convergent distally; rugose area limited to distal margin. Gonopore longer than wide. Parameres slender, elongated distally (Fig. 32 View Figures 29–33 ); pst1-2 not visible in examined males. Measurements (n = 4): TL = 1.32-1.41; HL = 0.31-0.32; HW = 0.24-0.25; PRW = 0.15-0.17; PTW = 0.23-0.25; AW = 0.30-0.36.
Female. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Figure 28 View Figures 27, 28 . Subgenital plate roughly rectangular, with narrow connection to cross-piece (Fig. 33 View Figures 29–33 ). Vulval margin rounded laterally, but roughly flat or slightly rounded medianly, with 4 short, slender vms and 4 or 5 short, thorn-like vss on each side; 3 short, slender vos on each side of subgenital plate; distal 1 vos median to vss. Measurements (n = 11): TL = 1.59-1.76 (1.68); HL = 0.35-0.37 (0.36); HW = 0.27-0.29 (0.28); PRW = 0.18-0.20 (0.19); PTW = 0.27-0.29 (0.28); AW = 0.35-0.41 (0.39).
Type material.
Lectotype 1♂, Lednice, Czechia, 26 Mar. 1953, F. Balát, 1138 (MMBC). Paralectotype. 1♀, same data as lectotype (MMBC).
Non-type material. 3♂, 8♀, same data as lectotype (MMBC). 1♀, Točná, Czechia, 23 May 1938, leg. K. Pfleger, Pfl13 (MMBC). 1♀, Skanör, Sweden, 12 Nov. 1963, F. Balát, 1315 (MMBC). 1♀, Břeclav - Kančí obora, Czechia, 22 May 1953, F. Balát, 1477 (MMBC).
Remarks.
Balát (1955) did not explicitly designate a holotype, but mentioned one male and one female on slide 15/53 (= number on host’s ring, current slide number 1138) as types; these comprise the syntype series. This is confirmed by Balát’s handwritten notes on the slide label. In addition, he mentioned three males and eight females from the same host specimen, and one female from a different host as additional material. These are all present in the Balát collection at the MMBC. We hereby select the male on slide 1138 as the lectotype, and one of the females on the same slide as a paralectotype. These have been marked on the slide with dark spots.
All examined specimens in Brno are poorly cleared, and many are still attached to feather fragments that further obscure the morphology. As a result, thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy and plates are not always clearly visible, and are here illustrated as accurately as possible. Vulval setae only clearly visible in one female, and range of variation may be greater than given above if more specimens are examined.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Brueelia kluzi Balat , 1955
Gustafsson, Daniel R., Oslejskova, Lucie, Najer, Tomas, Sychra, Oldrich & Zou, Fasheng 2019 |
Brueelia kluzi
Balat 1955 |