Pantodactylus parkeri, RUIBAL
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2003.00043.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EA7A8799-FF86-FFB3-FC38-FC6640FDF9E8 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Pantodactylus parkeri |
status |
|
Pantodactylus schreibersii albostrigatus: Parker (part), 1931: 286.
Euspondylus champsonatus: Burt & Burt (part), 1931: 335.
Pantodactylus schreibersii parkeri Ruibal, 1952: 518 .
Pantodactylus parkeri: Tedesco & Cei, 1999: 314 .
To assess the assertion of Tedesco & Cei (1999) about the specific status of P. parkeri , I examined 61 morphological characters to determine if a notable difference between this species and P. schreibersii existed. Although I found colour and pattern differences and overlapping meristic variation in several characters, the differences between the species for external morphology were few ( Table 2). No external morphological character differences appeared to be fixed; however, based on the significant, presumably fixed osteological differences discovered by Tedesco & Cei (1999), I continue to recognize this taxon as a distinct species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pantodactylus parkeri
Doan, Tiffany M. 2003 |
Pantodactylus parkeri: Tedesco & Cei, 1999: 314
Tedesco ME & Cei JM 1999: 314 |
Pantodactylus schreibersii parkeri
Ruibal R 1952: 518 |