Canthydrus laetabilis ( WALKER 1858)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5328829 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EA78571E-2506-FFB9-76A3-FB9AFDEC7FF7 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Canthydrus laetabilis ( WALKER 1858) |
status |
|
Canthydrus laetabilis ( WALKER 1858)
Hydroporus laetabilis WALKER 1858: 205 (original description).
Canthydrus laetabilis ( WALKER 1858) : SHARP 1882: 277; RÉGIMBART 1899: 250; ZIMMERMANN 1920: 11; VAZIRANI 1977: 6; TOLEDO 2008: 65; GHOSH et al. 2011: 9; NILSSON 2012 (distribution).
This member of the family Noteridae View in CoL was described by WALKER (1858: 205) from Ceylon ( Sri Lanka) in the dytiscid genus Hydroporus CLAIRVILLE 1806 View in CoL . So far it was only know from the Oriental zoogeographic region ( Bangladesh, India, Myanmar) and from India (Uttar Pradesh), Nepal and Pakistan in the Palearctic ( NILSSON 2012). GHOSH et al. (2011: 9) gave also " Congo ", this is, however, no doubt a mistake.
Two males and two females were found in the same pool ( Fig. 22 View Figs 19-22 ) as Laccophilus sharpi and L. flexuosus , together with several Hydroglyphus angularis (see above) ( Fig. 23; asterisk). To our knowledge a photo of the habitus of this species has never been provided before ( Fig. 15 View Figs 13-15 ).
Thisisthef i r s t r e c o r d fromIran.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Canthydrus laetabilis ( WALKER 1858)
Ewalka, Pešić, V. & Darvishzadeh, I. 2012 |
Canthydrus laetabilis ( WALKER 1858 )
GHOSH S & GHOSH P 2011: 9 |
TOLEDO M 2008: 65 |
VAZIRANI T 1977: 6 |
ZIMMERMANN A 1920: 11 |
REGIMBART M 1899: 250 |
SHARP D 1882: 277 |
Hydroporus laetabilis
WALKER F 1858: 205 |