Eupterotegaeus, Berlese, 1916
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F4508429-0996-45AD-B786-03CC547E9065 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13327416 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E97687DD-FFB0-9011-10FC-C190FA49F932 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eupterotegaeus |
status |
|
Key to known species of Eupterotegaeus View in CoL (adult)
1. Lamellar cusps nearly quadrangular, mediodistally located very close to each other................................. 2
- Lamellar cusps nearly elongate triangular, mediodistally well distanced from each other............................. 3
2. Lamellar cusp with small mediodistal tooth; bothridial seta long, distinctly longer than half of distance between bothridia; body length: 586–599................ E. xizangensis Wang & Solhøy, 2001 View in CoL (see Wang et al. 2001). Distribution: China (Tibet).
- Lamellar cusp without teeth; bothridial seta comparatively short, not longer than half of distance between bothridia; body length: 785........... E. flavus ( Ewing, 1918) View in CoL (see also Woolley 1957; Walter et al. 2013). Distribution: U.S.A. (Oregon).
3. Interlamellar tooth absent.............................................................................. 4
- Interlamellar tooth present.............................................................................. 7
4. All legs monodactylous; anterior notogastral margin with a pair of tubercles forming enantiophyses with a posterior tubercle of the bothridium; body length: 396–600.............................................................................................. E. rhamphosus Higgins & Woolley, 1968 View in CoL (see also Walter et al. 2013). Distribution: Nearctic.
- All legs tridactylous; anterior notogastral margin without a pair of tubercles forming enantiophyses with a posterior tubercle of the bothridium....................................................................................... 5
5. Rostral tooth well developed; lamellar cusp with distal toothlike process; body length: 616–755........................ Eupterotegaeus ornatissimus ( Berlese, 1908) View in CoL (see also Kunst 1958; Pérez-Iñigo 1997; Walter et al. 2013). Distribution: Holarctic.
- Rostral tooth minute or absent; lamellar cusp without distal toothlike process..................................... 6
6. Rostrum truncate; rostral tooth minute; lamellae distanced from each other; body length: 612............................................................................ E. rostratus Higgins & Woolley, 1963 View in CoL . Distribution: Nearctic.
- Rostrum rounded; rostral tooth absent; lamellae partially located close to each other; body length: 620–674........................................................... E. hendekensis Susyal, Ayyildiz & Baran, 2018 View in CoL . Distribution: Turkey.
7. Rostral tooth present.................................................................................. 8
- Rostral tooth absent................................................................................... 9
8. Rostral tooth medium-sized; lamellar cusp without distal toothlike process; notogastral seta c present; body length: 615–630........................................................... E. nortoni sp. nov. Distribution: U.S.A. (New York).
- Rostral tooth small; lamellar cusp with distal toothlike process; notogastral seta c absent; body length: 1030...................................................................... E. steinboecki ( Mihelčič, 1958) . Distribution: Austria.
9. Interlamellar tooth long, extending anteriorly beyond rostrum................................................. 10
- Interlamellar tooth medium-sized, not reaching rostrum..................................................... 11
10. Bothridial seta with large compact head; lamellar cusp with distal toothlike process; notogastral seta c present; body length: 536–645.................................................................................... E. armatus Aoki, 1969 View in CoL (see also Fujikawa 2002; Walter et al. 2013). Distribution: East of eastern Palaearctic, Southeast China, Costa Rica.
- Bothridial seta with elongate clavate head; lamellar cusp without distal toothlike process; notogastral seta c absent; body length: 691......................................................... E. nasalis Sitnikova, 1979 View in CoL . Distribution: Ecuador.
11. Rostrum truncate; notogastral seta c present; body length: 558–594..................................................................... E. spinatus Higgins & Woolley, 1963 View in CoL (see also Walter et al. 2013). Distribution: U.S.A. (Utah).
- Rostrum rounded; notogastral seta c absent; body length: 541–616... E. dentatus Sitnikova, 1979 View in CoL . Distribution: Neotropical.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |