Eupterotegaeus, Berlese, 1916

Ermilov, Sergey G., 2024, Ontogenetic instars of the oribatid mite Eupterotegaeus nortoni sp. nov. (Acari, Oribatida, Cepheusidae) from U. S. A., Zootaxa 5485 (1), pp. 49-61 : 60

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.6

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F4508429-0996-45AD-B786-03CC547E9065

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13327416

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E97687DD-FFB0-9011-10FC-C190FA49F932

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Eupterotegaeus
status

 

Key to known species of Eupterotegaeus View in CoL (adult)

1. Lamellar cusps nearly quadrangular, mediodistally located very close to each other................................. 2

- Lamellar cusps nearly elongate triangular, mediodistally well distanced from each other............................. 3

2. Lamellar cusp with small mediodistal tooth; bothridial seta long, distinctly longer than half of distance between bothridia; body length: 586–599................ E. xizangensis Wang & Solhøy, 2001 View in CoL (see Wang et al. 2001). Distribution: China (Tibet).

- Lamellar cusp without teeth; bothridial seta comparatively short, not longer than half of distance between bothridia; body length: 785........... E. flavus ( Ewing, 1918) View in CoL (see also Woolley 1957; Walter et al. 2013). Distribution: U.S.A. (Oregon).

3. Interlamellar tooth absent.............................................................................. 4

- Interlamellar tooth present.............................................................................. 7

4. All legs monodactylous; anterior notogastral margin with a pair of tubercles forming enantiophyses with a posterior tubercle of the bothridium; body length: 396–600.............................................................................................. E. rhamphosus Higgins & Woolley, 1968 View in CoL (see also Walter et al. 2013). Distribution: Nearctic.

- All legs tridactylous; anterior notogastral margin without a pair of tubercles forming enantiophyses with a posterior tubercle of the bothridium....................................................................................... 5

5. Rostral tooth well developed; lamellar cusp with distal toothlike process; body length: 616–755........................ Eupterotegaeus ornatissimus ( Berlese, 1908) View in CoL (see also Kunst 1958; Pérez-Iñigo 1997; Walter et al. 2013). Distribution: Holarctic.

- Rostral tooth minute or absent; lamellar cusp without distal toothlike process..................................... 6

6. Rostrum truncate; rostral tooth minute; lamellae distanced from each other; body length: 612............................................................................ E. rostratus Higgins & Woolley, 1963 View in CoL . Distribution: Nearctic.

- Rostrum rounded; rostral tooth absent; lamellae partially located close to each other; body length: 620–674........................................................... E. hendekensis Susyal, Ayyildiz & Baran, 2018 View in CoL . Distribution: Turkey.

7. Rostral tooth present.................................................................................. 8

- Rostral tooth absent................................................................................... 9

8. Rostral tooth medium-sized; lamellar cusp without distal toothlike process; notogastral seta c present; body length: 615–630........................................................... E. nortoni sp. nov. Distribution: U.S.A. (New York).

- Rostral tooth small; lamellar cusp with distal toothlike process; notogastral seta c absent; body length: 1030...................................................................... E. steinboecki ( Mihelčič, 1958) . Distribution: Austria.

9. Interlamellar tooth long, extending anteriorly beyond rostrum................................................. 10

- Interlamellar tooth medium-sized, not reaching rostrum..................................................... 11

10. Bothridial seta with large compact head; lamellar cusp with distal toothlike process; notogastral seta c present; body length: 536–645.................................................................................... E. armatus Aoki, 1969 View in CoL (see also Fujikawa 2002; Walter et al. 2013). Distribution: East of eastern Palaearctic, Southeast China, Costa Rica.

- Bothridial seta with elongate clavate head; lamellar cusp without distal toothlike process; notogastral seta c absent; body length: 691......................................................... E. nasalis Sitnikova, 1979 View in CoL . Distribution: Ecuador.

11. Rostrum truncate; notogastral seta c present; body length: 558–594..................................................................... E. spinatus Higgins & Woolley, 1963 View in CoL (see also Walter et al. 2013). Distribution: U.S.A. (Utah).

- Rostrum rounded; notogastral seta c absent; body length: 541–616... E. dentatus Sitnikova, 1979 View in CoL . Distribution: Neotropical.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF