Mesocyparis borealis MCIVER et BASINGER

Manchester, Steven R., 2014, Revisions To Roland Brown’S North American Paleocene Flora, Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae Series B 70 (3 - 4), pp. 153-210 : 158-159

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.14446/AMNP.2014.153

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E672D410-FF93-FF81-599A-6CAFF77CFBF9

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Mesocyparis borealis MCIVER et BASINGER
status

 

Mesocyparis borealis MCIVER et BASINGER

Foliar branches referred to Thuja interrupta NEWBERRY by Brown (1962) have been revised multiple times. Hickey (1977) called this species Thuites interruptus (NEWBERRY) BELL , using Sternberg’s genus Thuites . McIver and Basinger (1987) placed them in Cupressinocladus interruptus (NEWBERRY) SCHWEITZER , adopting Schweitzer’s (1974) recommendation that the form-genus Cupressinocladus Seward be applied to vegetative material when reproductive organs are not present. The same kind of foliage, with attached cones, was placed in a new genus and species, Mesocyparis borealis , from the Paleocene of Ravenscrag, Saskatchewan ( McIver and Basinger 1987). A short time later, Golovneva (1988) published a similar new genus and species as Microconium beringianum . In their subsequent survey of Cretaceous and Tertiary Thuja -like remains, McIver and Basinger (1989, p. 1911) considered oppositely branching foliage as Chamaecyparis interruptus (NEWBERRY) SCHWEITZER , but it seems likely that these represent fragments of Mesocyparis . Under the philosophy that vegetative and reproductive branches be treated separately, the appropriate names for this taxon are Cupressinocladus interruptus (NEWBERRY) SCHWEITZER , and (if cones are attached) Mesocyparis borealis MCIVER et BASINGER. The reason for this is that the same kind of foliage could be produced by more than one genus of Cupressaceae , and is thus placed in a catchall fossil-genus. The presence of cones permits a better resolved identification.

Angiosperms

Nymphaeaceae

Brown included Cabomba inermis (NEWBERRY) HOLLICK , Nymphaea leei (KNOWLTON) R. W. BROWN , Nymphaea pulchella (KNOWLTON) R. W. BROWN , and Paleonuphar hesperium R. W. BROWN among the water lilies cited from the Paleocene floras. The leaves assigned to Nyphaea appear to be correctly identified. The remains assigned to Cabomba are dichotomously branched unwebbed structures that correspond closely to roots known for the non-nymphaealean extinct genus, Quereuxia . The extinct genus Paranymphaea was subsequently transferred to Polygonaceae by McIver and Basinger (1993; see below).

Magnoliaceae

Bauhinia” wyomingana R. W. BROWN. Although bilobed with a laminar outline similar to that of Bauhinia View in CoL , the illustrated specimen differs in venation (pinnate, rather than actinodromous) and lacks the petiole morphology expected for that genus, and other legumes. It appears, instead to represent a leaf of Magnoliaceae View in CoL , cf. Liriodendron View in CoL . It is closely similar to the leaf known as Liriodendron iijimae TANAI from the upper Cretaceous (Senonian) of Japan ( Tanai 1979). Kirk Johnson (1996, in his discussion of another taxon, Liriodendrites bradacii K. JOHNSON) mentioned that more specimens of this kind occur in the Great Divide Basin. “ B.” wyomingiana is represented only by the single specimen illustrated by Brown, and the upper fragment is missing from the type collection, so that only the basal part of the illustrated specimen is available for continued study. The original site for this species is no longer accessible due to completed mining activity.

Although Brown (1962) treated several species as Magnolia View in CoL , the leaf architectural characters of extant Magnolia View in CoL are not unique to that genus or family. Entire-margined pinnately veined leaves occur in many families so the assignment of Magnolia View in CoL is based on general similarity rather than on diagnostic characters.

Lauraceae

Leaves of Lauraceae are entire-margined with pinnate secondaries that in some genera can be arranged with a basal or suprabasal pair of acrodromous secondaries. Similar venation can occur elsewhere among angiosperms, for example in Araliaceae , Hamamelidaceae , and Menispermaceae . When cuticle is preserved documenting paracytic stomata and oil cells, the affinities with Lauraceae can be substantiated, but cuticle was not examined for the species investigated by Brown. The familial and generic assignments for these taxa need verification: Cinnamomum sezannense WATELET , Laurophyllum caudatum (KNOWLTON) R. W. BROWN ; Laurophyllum perseanum R. W. BROWN ; Laurus socialis LESQUEREUX ; Lindera obtusata (WARD) R. W. BROWN ; Persea brossiana LESQUEREUX ; and Sassafras thermale (LESQUEREUX) R. W. BROWN.

Melastomites” montanensis R. W. BROWN. Brown (1962) noted that the leaves he attributed to Melastomites Unger are similar to those of Sassafras View in CoL and Cinnamomum View in CoL ( Lauraceae View in CoL ) as well as with Tococa of Melastomataceae View in CoL . The leaves do not, however, show the strongly impressed percurrent tertiaries typical of Tococa and other Melastomataceae View in CoL . Brown indicated that “surfaces of the better preserved leaves display minute dots, about 300 per sq cm, that were probably glandular”. These might represent the hardened contents of oil cells common in Lauraceae View in CoL .

Artocarpus” lessigiana (LESQUEREUX) KNOWLTON. Brown (1962) provided a helpful synonymy of the previously published occurrences of this species. The leaves are large, and deeply pinnately lobed with deep, rounded intralobal sinuses, superficially resembling extant Artocarpus View in CoL . Kirk Johnson (pers. comm. 2014) noted: “We dug hundreds of “ Artocarpus View in CoL ” leaqves in the Denver Basin, most from the first 2–3 million years of the Paleocene. They could be quite large, up to 20 inches long so they continue the resemblance to Artocarpus View in CoL , but lack all of the distinctive venation of Moraceae View in CoL . At Castle Rock, we also collected leaves that were strikingly similar to true Sassafras View in CoL in their morphology and venation. Close comparison of the big lobed “ Arctocarpus ” with the Sassafras View in CoL suggested affinity to the Lauraceae View in CoL .” Garland Upchurch studied the cuticles of similar specimens from the Denver and Raton Basin and also indicated lauralean affinities (Kaufmann et al. 1990; Upchurch and Wolfe 1987).

Chloranthaceae View in CoL

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Pinopsida

Order

Pinales

Family

Cupressaceae

Genus

Mesocyparis

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Caryophyllales

Family

Tamaricaceae

Genus

Thuja

Loc

Mesocyparis borealis MCIVER et BASINGER

Manchester, Steven R. 2014
2014
Loc

Melastomites” montanensis

R. W. BROWN. Brown 1962
1962
Loc

Artocarpus” lessigiana (LESQUEREUX)

KNOWLTON. Brown 1962
1962
Loc

Melastomites

Unger 1850
1850
Loc

Arctocarpus

Blanco 1837
1837
Loc

Magnoliaceae

de Jussieu 1789
1789
Loc

Tococa

Aublet 1775
1775
Loc

Tococa

Aublet 1775
1775
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF