Chaetophiloscia hastata Verhoeff, 1928
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.2.e98241 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:637A1ACA-8B97-4842-8F45-CF6609C8A809 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E2F13152-0DDC-58F6-A5BF-325DA16837F5 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Chaetophiloscia hastata Verhoeff, 1928 |
status |
|
Chaetophiloscia hastata Verhoeff, 1928 View in CoL
Chaetophiloscia elongata ; Arcangeli 1923: 1, pl. 1 figs 1-5; 1926: 42 (partim).
Chaetophiloscia hastata Verhoeff 1928: 164, figs 80-83; 1929: 133, figs 1-6; 1931a: 551; 1931b: 236; 1933a: 4, 17, 46, 51, 53, 55; 1933b: 108; 1936: 147; 1938: 123, 126, 128, 133, 134; 1939: 10; 1940: 111; 1941: 252, 263; 1943: 23; Arcangeli 1938: 118; Frankenberger 1939: 23, 24, 30; Radu V.V. 1959: 75, fig. 2; Radu V.G. 1960: 271, figs 3-5; 1985: 30, figs 12, 12bis; Vandel 1965a: 821, 828; 1965b: 264; Schmölzer 1965: 154, fig. 621; Karaman 1966: 386; Zangheri 1966: 519; Messner 1967: 23; Strouhal 1968: 311; Shereef 1970: 368; Andreev 1972: 185; 2002: 68; Dalens 1973: 124, figs 1-5; 1974: 308; Paoletti 1988: 521; Schmalfuss 1990: 181, figs 30-34; 1991: 6; 2003: 79; Manicastri and Taiti 1994: 134; Argano et al. 1995: 17; Andreev and Bozarova 2000: 28; Giurginca and Vănoaica 2002: 161, fig. 1; Giurginca and Curcic 2003: 40; Beron et al. 2004: 797; Giurginca et al. 2009: 35; Gongalsky and Kutzetsova 2011: 918; Baini et al. 2011: 138; 2014: 344, 346, 348; Kashani 2014: 77; 2018: 124; Beron 2020: 235; Giurginca 2022: 119, figs 59A, 60.
Material examined.
GEORGIA • 1 ♂ (MZUF); eastern Georgia , Mtskheta municipality, Saskhori limestone quarry, trap N4; 41.844023N, 44.524027E; 655 m a.s.l.; 13 Apr. 2022; leg. L. Shavadze & E. Maghradze GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂ (MZUF); 1 ♀ (IZISU); same as previous; trap N1; 41.846669N, 44.518673E; 657 m a.s.l.; 13 May 2022; leg. N. Modebadze & M. Gogshelidze.
Remarks.
Chaetophiloscia hastata was described by Verhoeff (1929) on specimens from Euxinograd, Bulgaria. In a paper published in 1928, Verhoeff cites the species to distinguish it from C. elongata and gives some distinguishing characters, such as the enlarged male pereopod 1-2 carpus, the extreme elongation of the male pleopod 5 exopod which surpasses the telson. Moreover, he also illustrated the male pleopod 1 endopod and the male pereopod 7 merus. Since these data unequivocally distinguish the species from all the others in the genus, Verhoeff, 1928 should be considered the authorship of the species instead of Verhoeff, 1929.
Distribution.
Slovenia: Istria ( Arcangeli 1923); Italy: Veneto ( Arcangeli 1938; Paoletti 1988), Marche ( Verhoeff 1928), Latium (Verhoeff 1931; Baini et al. 2011, 2014), Emilia Romagna ( Arcangeli 1926; Zangheri 1966), Tuscany ( Zangheri 1966); San Marino (Verhoeff 1933); Croatia: Cres ( Verhoeff 1938; Karaman 1966); Bulgaria: ( Verhoeff 1928, 1929; Vandel 1965b; Andreev 1972, 2002); Romania ( Radu 1960; Giurginca and Vănoaica 2002; Giurginca and Curcic 2003; Giurginca et al. 2009; Giurginca 2022); Cyprus ( Vandel 1965a; Strouhal 1968); Libya: Cyrenaica ( Arcangeli 1938); Egypt ( Shereef 1970); Greece ( Dalens 1973, 1974; Schmalfuss 1990); Turkey ( Verhoeff 1941; Schmalfuss 1990); Azerbaijan ( Schmalfuss 1990); Russia: Caucasus and Black Sea coast ( Verhoeff 1933b; Gongalsky and Kutznetsova 2011); Iraq ( Frankenberger 1939); Iran ( Kashani 2014). The species was cited also for Palestine by Vandel (1965a) and Strouhal (1968) but the record is doubtful according to Schmalfuss (1990). First record for Georgia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Oniscidea |
Family |
|
Genus |
Chaetophiloscia hastata Verhoeff, 1928
Shavadze, Lado, Barjadze, Shalva & Taiti, Stefano 2023 |
Chaetophiloscia hastata
Verhoeff 1928 |