Diaporthe meliae C.M. Tian & Q. Yang, 2022
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.91.84970 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E03A0E1D-05B5-58C3-855F-A510661CECCE |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Diaporthe meliae C.M. Tian & Q. Yang |
status |
sp. nov. |
Diaporthe meliae C.M. Tian & Q. Yang sp. nov.
Fig. 3 View Figure 3
Diagnosis.
Distinguished from the phylogenetically closely-related species, D. podocarpi-macrophylli , in shorter alpha conidia.
Etymology.
Named after the host genus on which it was collected, Melia .
Description.
Conidiomata pycnidial, immersed in the host bark, scattered, erumpent through the bark surface, discoid, with a single locule. Ectostromatic disc dark brown, one ostiole per disc, (325-)330-375(-385) μm (n = 30) diam. Locule undivided, 420-640 × 385-515 μm (n = 30). Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells (13.5-)15-26.5(-28) × 1.3-2.1(-2.3) μm (n = 30), L/W = 8.5-15.5, cylindrical, hyaline, branched, straight or slightly curved, tapering towards the apex. Alpha conidia hyaline, aseptate, fusiform, multi-guttulate, (6.7-)8-9.5(-10) × (2-)2.1-2.3 μm (n = 30), L/W = 3.4-4.5. Beta conidia not observed.
Culture characters.
Colony originally flat with white felty aerial mycelium, becoming auburn furcate mycelium with age, with irregular margin, conidiomata absent.
Specimens examined.
China, Shandong Province: Rizhao City , on branches of Melia azedarach , 20 April 2018, N. Jiang (holotype BJFC-S1668; ex-type living culture: CFCC 53089; living culture: CFCC 53090) .
Notes.
Two strains representing Diaporthe meliae cluster in a well-supported clade (ML/BI = 100/1), and appear closely related to D. podocarpi-macrophylli . Diaporthe meliae can be distinguished based on ITS, his3, tef-1α, and tub2 loci from D. podocarpi-macrophylli (4/459 in ITS, 15/455 in his3, 25/349 in tef-1α, and 14/401 in tub2). Morphologically, D. meliae can be distinguished from D. podocarpi-macrophylli by its longer conidiogenous cells (15-26.5 vs. 6-18 μm) and alpha conidia (8-9.5 vs. 3.5-8.5 μm) ( Gao et al. 2017).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |