Cassidini Gyllenhal, 1813

Bouchard, Patrice, Bousquet, Yves, Davies, Anthony E., Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A., Lawrence, John F., Lyal, Chris H. C., Newton, Alfred F., Reid, Chris A. M., Schmitt, Michael, Ślipinski, S. Adam & Smith, Andrew B. T., 2011, Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta), ZooKeys 88, pp. 1-972 : 221

Tribe Cassidini Gyllenhal, 1813

Cassideae Gyllenhal, 1813: 434 [stem: Cassid-]. Type genus: Cassida Linnaeus, 1758 [placed on the Official List of Generic Names in Zoology (ICZN 1974b)]. Comment: name placed on the Official List of Family-Group Names in Zoology (ICZN 1974b, as Cassidinae Stephens, 1831).

Evaspidotidae Gistel, 1856a: 381 [stem: Evaspist-]. Type genus: Evaspistes Gistel, 1856 [syn. of Cassida Linnaeus, 1758]. Comment: incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage.

*Chiridites Chapuis, 1875: 405 [stem: Chirid-]. Type genus: Chirida Chapuis, 1875. Comment: original vernacular name unavailable (Art. 11.7.2): not subsequently latinized.

*Hybosites Chapuis, 1875: 380 [stem: Hybos-]. Type genus: Hybosa Boheman, 1855 [ Hybosa has been credited to Duponchel and Chevrolat, 1842, e.g., Seeno and Wilcox (1982: 178), but the name is not available from that reference since there is no description nor available species included; this genus was first made available by Boheman (1855: 1)]. Comment: original vernacular name unavailable (Art. 11.7.2): not subsequently latinized.

Basiptites Chapuis, 1875: 379 [stem: Basipt-]. Type genus: Basipta Chevrolat, 1842. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form and generally accepted as in Hincks (1952: 337, as Basiptini ).

Coptocyclitae Spaeth and Reitter, 1926: 7, in key [stem: Coptocycl-]. Type genus: Coptocycla Chevrolat, 1836. Comment: this family-group name was also used in the same year by Spaeth (1926: 1, as Coptocyclitae ) but we could not establish priority.

Charidotitae Spaeth, 1942: 40 [stem: Charidotid-]. Type genus: Charidotis Boheman, 1854. Comment: name proposed after 1930 without description or bibliographic reference to such a description (Art. 13.1), however available because it was used as valid before 2000 as in Hincks (1952: 343, as Charidotini ) and was not rejected by an author who, between 1961 and 1999, applied Article 13 of the then current edition of the Code (see Art. 13.2.1).