Troyus fabulosus Grishin, 2023
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7710103 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DD62E766-2A64-724E-FF36-C681FB3BFE6B |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Troyus fabulosus Grishin |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Troyus fabulosus Grishin , new species
https://zoobank.org/ 15B54334-E76A-44D0-853C-B15E1B423C4D
( Fig. 48 View Figure 48 part, 49, 50a, b, 51)
Definition and diagnosis. Inspection of genomic trees of Troyus A. Warren and Turland, 2012 ( type species Troyus turneri A. Warren and Turland, 2012 ) reveals that specimens of Troyus fantasos (Cramer, 1780) ( type locality in Suriname) are not monophyletic in the mitochondrial genome tree ( Fig. 48b View Figure 48 blue and red) and they are correspondingly partitioned into two clades in nuclear DNA. Fst / Gmin statistics for the comparison of the two clades are 0.38/0.006, suggesting that they represent distinct species. The blue clade contains more southern populations including a specimen from French Guiana, and these specimens agree better with the original illustration of T. fantasos , thus being this species. The red clade consists of northern populations (southernmost of those sequenced was from Honduras) and does not have a name, therefore being a new species. COI barcodes of the new species differ from those of T. fantasos by 4.3% (28 bp). However, it shares the barcodes (and the rest of mitochondrial DNA, Fig. 48b View Figure 48 ) with sympatric Troyus onaca ( Evans, 1955) and Troyus diversa maeon (Mabille, 1891) . Moreover, we see mitochondrial DNA introgression between T. aurelius (Plötz, 1882) ( Fig. 48b View Figure 48 olive) and T. phyllides (Röber, 1925) ( Fig. 48b View Figure 48 cyan), suggesting evolutionary peculiarities in this genus and underscoring the importance of nuclear DNA analysis ( Fig. 48a View Figure 48 ). The new species keys to “ Vettius fantasos fantasos ” (J.45.12(b)) in Evans (1955), and differs from it by generally paler and less contrasting ventral hindwing: area between veins M 1 and M 3 that is mostly pale distad of the postdiscal rust-colored cross-bar ( Fig. 49 View Figure 49 , 50a, b View Figure 50 ), but is dark in typical T. fantasos ( Fig. 50c, d View Figure 50 ); the cross-bar is usually more distal in T. fantasos than in the new species, making the postdiscal pale spot appear smaller in the new species than in T. fantasos ; the dorsal hindwing pale spots are whiter than more typically brownish-orange spots of T. fantasos ; the valva is broader (in lateral view), the harpe is less robust and its posterior spike-like projection is thinner ( Fig. 51a,b View Figure 51 ) compared to T. fantasos ( Fig. 51c,d View Figure 51 ). In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic in nuclear genome: aly528.39.5:A75G, aly 1409.3.1:A174T, aly669.14.1:A672T, aly536.145.4:G198A, and aly 2085.2.4:T943C, and COI barcode differs from the phenotypically similar T. fantasos : C49C(not T), C82C(not T), C121C(not T), C145C(not T), and C343C(not A), but is shared with the phenotypically distinct T. onaca and T. diversa maeon .
Barcode sequence of the holotype. Sample NVG-10654, GenBank OP762113, 658 base pairs: AACTTTATACTTTATTTTTGGAATTTGAGCAGGAATACTAGGAACATCCTTAAGTTTATTAATTCGAACAGAATTAGGTAACCCTGGAT CTTTAATTGGAGATGATCAAATTTATAATACCATTGTAACAGCTCATGCTTTTATCATAATTTTTTTTATAGTTATACCAATTATAATTG GAGGATTTGGAAATTGATTAGTCCCATTAATATTAGGAGCTCCCGATATAGCATTCCCACGAATAAATAATATAAGATTTTGAATATTAC CTCCTTCTTTAATACTTTTAATTTCAAGAAGAATTGTAGAAAATGGTGCAGGAACAGGATGAACAGTTTACCCCCCTCTTTCATCTAA TATTGCCCACCAAGGAGCTTCTGTTGATTTAGCAATTTTTTCTCTTCATTTAGCTGGGATTTCATCAATTCTAGGAGCAATTAATTTTA TTACTACAATCATTAATATACGAATTAGAAATTTATCATTTGATCAAATACCTTTATTTGTTTGATCAGTAGGTATTACAGCATTATTATT ACTTTTATCACTACCGGTATTAGCAGGAGCTATTACTATACTTTTAACTGATCGAAATTTAAACACATCTTTTTTTGATCCTGCTGGAGG AGGAGATCCAATCTTATATCAACATTTATTT
Type material. Holotype: ♂ deposited in the Texas A&M University Insect Collection, College Station, Texas, USA ( TAMU), illustrated in Fig. 49 View Figure 49 , bears the following seven rectangular labels, six white: [ TEXAS: | HIDALGO COUNTY | Penitas], [coll. | 24-Oct-1975 | Edward C. Knudson], [Allyn Museum photo | No. 810610 7-8], [ HESPERIIDAE , | Hesperiinae : | Vettius fantasos | (Stoll, [1780]) | ♂ det. R.O. Kendall | [M. & B. No. 137.5]], [DNA sample ID: | NVG-10654 | c/o Nick V. Grishin], [genitalia | NVG180106-71 | Nick V. Grishin], and one red [ HOLOTYPE ♂ | Troyus fabulosus | Grishin]. Paratypes: 7♂♂ in TMMC unless specified otherwise: Mexico: Tamaulipas: 1♂ NVG-20062D06 1–4 km N of Gomez Farias, 350 m, 10-Aug-1981, C. J. Durden; 2♂ NVG-20062F07 and NVG-20062F08, 13 km NNE of Chamal, 1600 ft, 13-Jan-1969; San Luis Potosi: 1♂ NVG- 20062D07 Maiz, El Sabinito, 14-Jun-1979, C. J. Durden; 1♂ NVG-17111A03 El Platanito, 24-Jun-1983, W. H. Howe leg. [ LACM]; 1♂ NVG-20062D05 Veracruz, 4.5 km SW of Omealca, 7-Aug-1981, C. J. Durden; Honduras 1♂ NVG-19022F03 San Pedro Sula, 27-Dec-1978, Robert D. Lehman leg. [ USNM].
Type locality. USA: Texas, Hidalgo Co., Peñitas.
Etymology. The name implies that this northern counterpart of South American T. fantasos is no less fantastic than it. The name is a masculine adjective.
English name. Fabulous skipper.
Distribution. Currently known from South Texas, USA, Mexico, and Honduras.
Comment. Incongruence between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA trees ( Fig. 48a View Figure 48 vs. b) is remarkable in Troyus . It highlights the dangers of relying exclusively on mitochondrial DNA in phylogenetic studies.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
