Amphiura (Amphiura) digitula (H. L. Clark, 1911)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.12651/JSR.2020.9.3.273 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DD1187F2-B42A-3C6B-FCFF-FC064EBCFB74 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Amphiura (Amphiura) digitula |
status |
|
Amphiura (Amphiura) digitula View in CoL
(H.L. Clark, 1911) ( Fig. 1 View Fig )
dzẅŋụẹHṘḇṻIJƞ (신ḡ)
Amphiodia digitula H.L. Clark, 1911: 162 View in CoL .
Amphiura leptopholida H.L. Clark, 1915: 226 View in CoL .
Amphiura digitula Matsumoto, 1917: 199 View in CoL ; D’yakonov, 1954: 71; A.M. Clark, 1965: 49.
Diamphiodia digitula Fell, 1962: 14 View in CoL .
Amphiura (Amphiura) digitula View in CoL : Stöhr et al., 2020: 243028.
Material examined. Four specimens, Geoje Island (34° 44′41″N, 128°40′01″E), 27 August 2017, Lee T., 47 m depth GoogleMaps by grab ( NIBRIV0000863921 , NIBRIV0000863922 , NIBRIV0000863926 , NIBRIV0000863927 ) .
Description. Disk small (diameter: 5.2 - 7.3 mm), slightly concave at interradii and covered by numerous fine scales ( Fig. 1A View Fig ). Arms long (length: 25.0 - 35.1 mm), approximately 4.8 times longer than disk diameter. Disk scales circular form, overlapping, with indistinguishable primary scales ( Fig. 1A View Fig ). Radial shield small ( Fig. 1A View Fig ), longer than wide ( Fig. 1B View Fig ), separated by disk scales proximally but connected distally ( Fig. 1B View Fig ). Small projection on distal end of radial shield, stumpy hook situat- ed at outermost of projection, hook tip divided into three or four ( Fig. 1B View Fig ). Oral shield ovoid form, slightly longer than wide, more angular distally than proximally ( Fig. 1C, D View Fig ). Madreporite shield more rounded than others ( Fig. 1C View Fig ). Tooth papilla one and two adoral shield spines on an adoral shield ( Fig. 1D View Fig ). The 2nd adoral shield spine longer than other, tapered dramatically toward dull tip ( Fig. 1D View Fig ). Dorsal arm plate rounded triangular, proximal end more angular than distal end ( Fig. 1E View Fig ). Lateral arm plate wider than long ( Fig. 1E View Fig ). Arm spines four. Ventral arm plate longer than wide, pentagonal with dull angles, and proximal end relatively more angular ( Fig. 1F View Fig ). Two tentacle shields in single tentacle pore, not fully covered ( Fig. 1F View Fig ).
Distribution. Korea ( Korea Strait), Japan (Enoshima, Sadoga Island, Sagami Bay).
Habitat. Clay or sandy clay substrates.
Color. In live specimens, disk is gray and arms are pale brown.
Remarks. This species has several distinguishing morphological characteristics, including a long, tapered oral papilla and small, hooked stumpy spine on the distal part of the radial shield. As such, the species is easily distinguished from other Amphiura species in Korea. Matsumoto (1917) reported A. (A.) digitula specimens with four oral papillae, but A.M. Clark (1965) described that A. leptopholida , with three oral papillae, had almost morphological characteristics nearly identical to A. digitula . So, A. leptopholida synonymized A. digitula , even though the number of the oral papilla differs. All of the Korean specimens of A. digitula were identical to the description of A. digitula forma leptopholida in Clark, 1965, so we classified these samples as A. digitula .
We also obtained a partial sequence of COI from one A. (A.) digitula specimen in this study. The amplified sequence was 657 bp and matched the general DNA barcoding region. The NJ and ML phylogenetic analyses revealed that species of the Amphiura group was monophyletic, but supported by a low bootstrap value ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). But, the group of Amphiura shown high interspecific pairwise distance (p-distance) values between each species in this study, and which was higher than the mean of interspecific p-distance in previous echinoderms DNA barcoding studies ( Layton et al., 2016; Boissin et al., 2017). The interspecific p-distance between A. (A.) digitula and the other 20 Amphiura species ranged from 20.4% (A. (A.) elandiformis ) to 26.6% (A. (A.) angularis ), with a mean of 24.5% ( Table 2). This is slightly higher than the mean in ophiuroids (18.9%) reported by Boissin et al. (2017) but corresponds to the mean and average value of interspecific Amphiura : mean = 24.1% and range = 17.0 - 30.0% ( Table 2). The pairwise distance of COI presented the identification clearly between each species of the Amphiura , even though not shown the clear phylogenetic relationships within in NJ and ML trees. This study used morphological and molecular analyses to identify the recently collected specimens as A. (A.) digitula , a newly recorded species in the Korea marine fauna.
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amphiura (Amphiura) digitula
Shin, Taekjun Lee and Sook 2020 |
Amphiura (Amphiura) digitula
Stohr, S. & T. O'Hara & B. Thuy 2020: 243028 |
Diamphiodia digitula
Fell, H. B. 1962: 14 |
Amphiura digitula
Clark, A. M. 1965: 49 |
Matsumoto, H. 1917: 199 |
Amphiura leptopholida H.L. Clark, 1915: 226
Clark, H. L. 1915: 226 |
Amphiodia digitula H.L. Clark, 1911: 162
Clark, H. L. 1911: 162 |