Drupella, Thiele, 1925

Scott, C. M., Mehrotra, R., Hein, M. Y., Moerland, M. S. & Hoeksema, B. W., 2017, Population dynamics of corallivores (Drupella and Acanthaster) on coral reefs of Koh Tao, a diving destination in the Gulf of Thailand, Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 65, pp. 68-79 : 72-74

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5355913

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E977D5BE-BF21-400B-893F-291E5550C832

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DB716015-FF8B-0C49-4E28-9045FD67A492

treatment provided by

Valdenar

scientific name

Drupella
status

 

Drupella View in CoL and Acanthaster abundance relative to reef threats. Drupella abundance showed no correlation with diving pressure (R 2 =0.001, p=0.943) according to the results of Weterings (2011) and there was also no significant correlation between Acanthaster populations and diving pressure (R 2 =0.071, p=0.402). When coral predator abundance was compared to the combined stress model of Weterings (2011) there was no significant correlation for both Drupella (R 2 =0.123, p=0.355) and Acanthaster (R 2 =0.123, p=0.355). Drupella populations also showed no significant (R 2 =0.404, p=0.175) correlation with lower reef health as recorded by Lamb et al. (2014) and neither did Acanthaster abundance (R 2 =0.258, p=0.304).

When compared by site use categories developed by Lamb et al. (2014), no significant differences were found. Drupella snails showed scores of 0.95 ± 0.34 in high-use sites and 0.81 ± 0.19 in low-use sites, respectively ( Fig. 5a View Fig ; ANOVA Df=1, p=0.723). Mean Acanthaster abundance was 10.3 ± 4.2 indiv. ha-1 at low-use sites and 5.8 ± 1.9 indiv. ha-1 at high-use sites ( Fig. 5b View Fig ; ANOVA Df=1, p=0.406). Similarly, when compared with sites’ protective status developed by Hein et al. (2015), Drupella snails seemed to be more abundant in MPA sites (0.95 ± 0.34 compared with 0.67 ± 0.26 at non-MPA sites) ( Fig. 5c View Fig ; ANOVA Df=1, p=0.549), and Acanthaster more abundant in non-MPA sites (7.2 ± 1.4 indiv. ha-1 compared with 3.0 ± 1.0 indiv. ha-1 at MPA sites) ( Fig. 5d View Fig ; ANOVA Df=1, p=0.087). Nevertheless, none of these differences were statistically significant.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Gastropoda

Order

Neogastropoda

Family

Muricidae

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Gastropoda

Order

Neogastropoda

Family

Muricidae

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Gastropoda

Order

Neogastropoda

Family

Muricidae

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Gastropoda

Order

Neogastropoda

Family

Muricidae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF