Microporina japonica Canu and Bassler, 1929

Arakawa, Shinji, 2016, Taxonomy of Some Microporids (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata) from the Pacific Coast of Japan, Species Diversity 21 (1), pp. 9-30 : 18-21

Microporina japonica Canu and Bassler, 1929 ( Figs 6–8 , 13B )

Microporina japonica Canu and Bassler, 1929: 139 , pl. 14, figs 9–11.

Microporina articulata (not of Fabricius, 1821): Sakakura 1936: 259, pl. 15, figs 1–5; Arakawa 1984: 74, pl. 8-1, fig. 2 (only listed and illustrated); Nishizawa 1987: 182, pl. 1, fig. 3; Arakawa 1995: 80 (only listed); Nishizawa 1997: 152, 153 (only listed); Arakawa 1999: 57.

Material examined. NMNS PA 16842 (eight internodes, A–H), 16844, and 18156 (inner surface of frontal shield), Station 1700, Hakurei-Maru cruise GH80-2; NMNS PA 16843 (four internodes, A–D), 18152, and 18153, Station 1709, Hakurei-Maru cruise GH80-2; SGBC-0389 (four internodes, A–D), Station 1739, Hakurei-Maru cruise GH80- 2; SGBC-0391, Jizodo Formation , Pleistocene , Jizodo , Chiba Prefecture, Japan; SGBC-0392, Jizodo Formation , Pleistocene , Nanamagari , Chiba Prefecture, Japan; SGBC-0393, Jizodo Formation , Pleistocene , Ichinosawa , Chiba Prefecture, Japan; SGBC-0411 (not coated with metal), Jizodo Formation , Pleistocene, Atebi, Chiba Prefecture, Japan . See Table 1 for coordinates and depths of cruise samples.

Measurements (in milimetres). NMNS PA 16842, 16843, 16844, 18152, and SGBC-0389. Autozooids (n =183, 14): ZL, 0.62–1.18 (0.821±0.094); ZW, 0.25–0.44 (0.338±0.035); OrL, 0.08–0.14 (0.107±0.014); OrW, 0.13– 0.25 (0.201±0.019). Avicularia (n =76, 14): AvL, 0.16–0.25 (0.210±0.020); AvW, 0.13–0.24 (0.180±0.019).

Description. Colony erect, consisting of internodes increasing in width distally. Minimum internode size 2.0 mm long by 0.82 mm in diameter (NMNS PA 16842 A: Fig. 6A ); maximum size about 7.0 mm long (NMNS PA 16844: Fig. 6D ) and about 1.5 mm in diameter (NMNS PA 16843 C). Internodes generally circular in transverse section, composed of 8 to 12 columns of zooids; proximal ends of internodes occupied by kenozooids, and mural rim sometimes projected proximally ( Figs 6A , 7D ). Zooids elongate, sides nearly parallel, or wide in middle, sometimes tapering proximally. Frontal shield cryptocystal, flat, coarsely granulate, with many conspicuous, evenly distributed pores, surrounded by thick, rounded mural rim. Mural rim salient, finely granulated, and thickened with secondary calcification ( Figs 7 A–D, 8A). Opesiules originally large, elliptical or rounded triangular, completely occluded by smooth calcification with vein-like sculpturing ( Fig. 8 A–C). Orifice semielliptical, with proximal border straight or broadly concave. Oral spines lacking. Ovicells absent. Avicularium distal to orifice, oval in outline, longer than wide, directed proximally; rostrum triangular, with complete, M-shaped pivot bar, becoming round with increasing calcification and post-mortem abrasion ( Fig. 7 A–D). Secondary calcificaion sometimes covering zooidal orifice or postmandibular part of avicularium with granulated layer.

Distribution. The known distribution of this species is the Tsugaru Strait [“Sea of Japan ” in Canu and Bassler (1929)] and the continental shelf east of the Boso Peninsula at depths of 57 to 150 m. Because Sakakura (1936: pl. 15 (5), fig.1) illustrated Microporina articulata from the Tsugaru Strait as having only a semicircular orifice, M. japonica may overlap in distribution with that species. In fact, M. articulata from Korea also has a semicircular orifice with a straight proximal border ( Rho and Seo 1990).

Among Japanese fossils recorded as M. articulata , the Pleistocene specimen from Niigata illustrated by Nishizawa (1987) matches M. japonica in all respects. Neogene specimens from Hokkaido and the Noto Peninsula, described by Hayami (1970) and Nishizawa and Sakagami (1986), also have salient opesiules, but their other features need to be reexamined in detail.

Remarks. Microporina japonica shows large variations in the shape of the orifice, the proximal border of which can be nearly straight or broadly concave, and the opesiules are large. Canu and Bassler (1929) originally described this species from the Tsugaru Strait, Japan, on the basis of its having smaller zooids than Microporina articulata , but did not mention any other differences between the two. Sakakura (1936) considered M. japonica to be a junior synonym of M. articulata , because zooidal size varies among Japanese specimens. In my study, maximum zooid length was 1.18 mm (NMNS PA 16842 D), which is within the size range of North American specimens of M. articulata , based on the figures of Robertson (1905: pl. XIV, fig. 86) and Powell (1968: pl. II, fig. c), and maximum width was 0.44 mm (NMNS PA 16843 C), which is larger than the width indicated for M. articulata by Osburn (1950: 106). Sakakura’s (1936) discussion was correct on this point.

However, M. articulata differs from M. japonica in the shape of the orifice. In M. articulata it is consistently semicircular, with a straight proximal border ( Busk 1855; Smitt 1868; Robertson 1905; Osburn 1950; Kluge 1962; Powell 1968). In my material, the orifice is semielliptical, with a proximal border ranging from straight to broadly concave. This variation is evident even within a single internode. Orifice size also varies in M. japonica , but it is larger than in Alaskan specimens of M. articulata ( Robertson 1905) . Sakakura (1936) likewise observed orifice variation in his material, but concluded it fell within the range of variation in M. articulata . His fossil material, however, appears to have included two or more distinct species having differently shaped internodes, zooids, orifices, and avicularia.

Microporina japonica has conspicuous cryptocystal opesiules, as illustrated by Canu and Bassler (1929). The opesiules are elliptical in M. japonica , compared to slit-like in M. articulata . In my specimens, the layer occluding the opesiules has a vein-like structure, but whether this is diagnostic for M. japonica is not clear.

The avicularia in M. japonica are more or less elongate. The illustrations of Canu and Bassler (1929) show very long avicularia, with a maximum length/width ratio of about 1.6: 1; this ratio also reaches about 1.4: 1 in my material. Some of the numerous specimens identified as M. articulata from northern seas also have elongate avicularia ( Busk 1855; Smitt 1868; Powell 1968). At present, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the differences in avicularia among Microporina species, and a more precise comparison based on a larger number of samples will be necessary.

Figures

Fig. 6. Microporina japonica Canu and Bassler, 1929, A, NMNS PA 16842A; B, NMNS PA 16842F; C, NMNS PA 18152; D, NMNS PA 16844: A, B, small internodes; C, medium-sized internode; D, large internode. Scale bars: 200µm.

Fig. 7. Microporina japonica Canu and Bassler, 1929, A, NMNS PA 16842 H; B, NMNS PA 16844; C, D, NMNS PA 16843 B: A, zooids with thin mural rim; B, zooids with greatly thickened lateral rim; C, D, zooids with immediately thickened lateral rim. Scale bars: 200µm.

Fig. 8. Microporina japonica Canu and Bassler, 1929, A, B, NMNS PA 18153; C, NMNS PA 18152: A, orifice, opesiules, and avicularium; B, enlargement of opesiule in A; C, orifice and opesiules. Scale bars:50µm (A, C); 20µm (B).

Fig. 13. Inner surface of frontal shield, A, Metamicropora areolae (Sakakura), NMNS PA 18158; B, Microporina japonica Canu and Bassler, NMNS PA 18156; C, Microporina okadai Silén, NMNS PA 18160. Scale bars: 50µm.