Megalostrata raptor (L. Koch, 1866 )

Bonaldo, Alexandre B., Galán-Sanchez, M. Antonio & García, Fabián, 2024, Advances on the taxonomy of Megalostrata Karsch, 1880 (Araneae, Corinnidae, Corinninae), with descriptions of two new species, Zootaxa 5458 (4), pp. 495-523 : 497-500

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5458.4.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:63B55CBA-8E31-4834-B43F-2BB8994BA956

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11991229

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA2B87EE-576D-FFA6-FF4F-2E61C6B2F879

treatment provided by

Plazi (2024-06-10 12:16:27, last updated 2024-11-27 07:41:18)

scientific name

Megalostrata raptor (L. Koch, 1866 )
status

 

Megalostrata raptor (L. Koch, 1866) View in CoL

Figs 1A View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 , 3A, B View FIGURE 3

Hypsinotus raptor L. Koch, 1866: 274 , pl. 11, figs 174, 175 (♂ holotype from Mexico, deposited in The Natural History Museum , London, 1916.6.1.801, not re-examined).

Corinna raptor ; Petrunkevitch 1911: 469.

Corinna raptrix ; Bonnet 1957: 1215 (invalid emendation).

Megalostrata raptrix ; Bonaldo 2000: 118, figs 110–111, 302–309 (invalid emendation).

Note. For a complete list of synonyms, see Bonaldo (2000: 118) and WSC (2024). Bonaldo (2000), following Bonnet (1957), used the epithet raptrix , the feminine form of raptor , to agree in gender with the feminine generic names Megalostrata View in CoL and Corinna View in CoL , respectively. However, according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (article 31.2.2), since there is no indication in the original description that the species-group name is a noun or an adjective, the epithet raptor must be considered a noun in apposition. Consequently, raptrix is an invalid emendation.

Diagnosis. Males of M. raptor resemble those of M. depicta by the rounded, smooth apical tegular process, differing by the retro-basally oriented embolus (oriented retro-apically in M. depicta , Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ) and by the entire RTA (bifid in M. depicta , Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ). They share with M. paludosa spec. nov. the entire RTA, being differentiated by the smooth apical tegular process (with a field of apical teeth in M. paludosa , Fig. 22A View FIGURE 22 ) and the embolus oriented retro-basally (oriented retro-apically in M. paludosa , Fig. 22A View FIGURE 22 ) ( Figs 3A, B View FIGURE 3 ; Bonaldo 2000, figs 304–306). Females are similar to those of both M. depicta and M. pacifica spec. nov. by the elongated, tube-shaped secondary spermathecae, but can be distinguished from the former by the oblique orientation of the secondary spermathecae (oriented longitudinally in M. pacifica spec. nov., Figs 8A, B View FIGURE 8 ) and from the latter by the posterior atrium defined by a transversal anterior ridge at the level of the copulatory openings (posterior atrium ill-defined in M. depicta , Figs 5A View FIGURE 5 , 6A View FIGURE 6 ) ( Bonaldo 2000, figs 308, 309).

Description. See Bonaldo (2000: 118). Additional photographic documentation: Figs 1A View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 , 3A, B View FIGURE 3 .

New records. MEXICO: Veracruz, Calcahualco, Xamaticpac [19°07’34.1”N 97°04’01.5”W, 1.700 m a.s.l.]. Oak forest fragment, leg. Alvarez-Padilla et al., 19–27.IV.2013, 1 ♂ (PXF258 UNAM) GoogleMaps . NICARAGUA: Esteli, Reserva Natural Miraflor [13°15’00.0”N 86°14’20.4”W], 1 ♂, photographed by A. Anker (not collected) GoogleMaps . CURAÇAO: Seru Gracia, Christoffel National Park, Dry evergreen [12°21’43.2”N 69°08’42.0”W], leg. R. Jocqué & E. Tybaert, 13.VII.2011, on bromeliad, 2 ♂ ( MRAC) GoogleMaps .

Distribution. Previously known from Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, and Panama ( Bonaldo, 2000). Herein newly recorded from Curaçao, Caribbean Netherlands.Additionally, a male specimen from Nicaragua, photographed alive ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ), is reported here. Despite the fact it was not collected, the photograph depicts sufficient elements for identification, notably the male palp in retro-dorsal view, showing a massive, rounded RTA that is typical of M. raptor ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 ).

Bonaldo, A. B. (2000) Taxonomia da subfamilia Corinninae (Araneae, Corinnidae) nas regioes neotropical e neartica. Iheringia, Serie Zoologia, 89, 3 - 148. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 0073 - 47212000000200001

Bonnet, P. (1957) Bibliographia araneorum. Analyse methodique de toute la litterature araneologique jusqu'en 1939. Tome II. In: Systematique des araignees. Etude par ordre alphabetique. 3 me Parti. G-M. Douladoure, Toulouse, pp. 1927 - 3026.

Karsch, F. (1880) Arachnologische Blatter (Decas I). Zeitschrift fu ¨ r die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften, Dritte Folge, 5, 373 - 409.

Koch, L. (1866) Die Arachniden-Familie der Drassiden. Hefte 1 - 6. Lotzbeck, Nurnberg, 304 pp.

Petrunkevitch, A. (1911) A synonymic index-catalogue of spiders of North, Central and South America with all adjacent islands, Greenland, Bermuda, West Indies, Terra del Fuego, Galapagos, etc. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 29, 1 - 791. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 23819

Pickard-Cambridge, O. (1895) Arachnida. Araneida. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Zoology. London, 1, 145 - 160.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 1. Living specimens of Megalostrata Karsch, 1880. A Megalostrata raptor (L. Koch, 1866), male (not collected) from Reserva Natural Miraflor, Nicaragua, photo by A. Anker; B Megalostrata depicta (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1895), male (CHNUFPI 1485) from Estación de Biología Tropical “Los Tuxtlas”, Veracruz, Mexico, photo by L. S. Carvalho.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 2. Megalostrata raptor (L. Koch, 1866), male (UNAM INVPIC071): A dorsal view; B ventral view; C lateral view. Scale bar: 2 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 3. A, B Megalostrata raptor (L. Koch, 1866), male (UNAM INVPICV071):A palp, ventral view. B palp, retrolateral view; C, D Megalostrata depicta (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1895), male (UNAM CORINN0039): C palp, ventral view. D palp, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: E, embolus; RTA, retrolateral tibial apophysis; TP, tegular process. Scale bar: 2 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 5. Megalostrata depicta (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1895), female epigynum: A ventral view; B dorsal view; C posterior view. Scale bar: 0.2 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 6. Megalostrata depicta (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1895), female epigynum: A, C ventral view; B, D dorsal view; E, F posterior view (A, B, E undigested; C, D, F digested; A, B, E, F IBSP 226286; C, D UNAM INVPICV071).Abbreviations. CO, copulatory opening; CD, copulatory duct; FD, fertilization ducts; S1, primary spermathecae; S2, secondary spermathecae; EPC, epigastric plate cuticle. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 8. Megalostrata pacifica spec. nov.: female holotype (CAS 9036847): A epigynum, ventral view; B same, dorsal view; C same, posterior view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 22. Megalostrata paludosa spec. nov.. A, B male holotype:A palp, ventral view; B palp, retrolateral view. C–E female paratype (MUSEUV 2796): C epigynum, ventral view; D same, posterior view; E same, dorsal view. Scale bars. 0.2 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 25. Known geographical distribution of Megalostrata species.

UNAM

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

MRAC

Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Corinnidae

Genus

Megalostrata