Hexapopha reimoseri ( Fage, 1938 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5329.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BDC2B521-8DC4-4680-A210-5CAEF611F02B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8244027 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D344879B-FFFD-5E3B-FF13-3C8FFCF2FA3D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hexapopha reimoseri ( Fage, 1938 ) |
status |
|
Hexapopha reimoseri ( Fage, 1938) View in CoL
Map 1 View MAP 1
Xestaspis reimoseri Fage, 1938: 371 View in CoL , fig.1 (male holotype from Hamburg Farm, Limón, Costa Rica, not in Natural History Museum of Vienna, lost according to Platnick et al. 2014).
Hexapopha reimoseri: Platnick et al. 2014: 7 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , figs 1–60; WSC 2021.
Diagnosis. Males resemble those of H. hone and H. osa by the presence of a proximal subtriangular projection on the conductor ( Platnick et al. 2014: figs 70, 105) but differs from those H. hone by endite’s P2 wide, laminar ( Platnick et al. 2014: fig. 9) and from those H. osa by labium anterior margin projecting forward at middle ( Platnick et al. 2014: fig. 15). Females resemble those of H. hone , H. osa and H. jimenez by the copulatory opening positioned internaly, under the postepigastric plate ( Platnick et al. 2014: figs 85–86, 94–95, 120–121) but can be distinguished by the postepigastric plate twice as wide as long and by the thick, straight arms of T-shaped genitalic process ( Platnick et al. 2014: figs 59–60).
Description. See Platnick et al. (2014): 7.
Distribution. Heredia and Limón, Costa Rica ( Map 1 View MAP 1 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hexapopha reimoseri ( Fage, 1938 )
Feitosa, Níthomas M., Ott, Ricardo & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2023 |
Xestaspis reimoseri
Fage, L. 1938: 371 |