Protoneura sanguinipes Westfall, 1987
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4361.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:53489D29-C68F-44FD-9EA2-CFCA7B949630 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6030159 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D2332A59-FF8C-4E74-FF5D-FEE4FAAE697A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2017-12-01 10:49:54, last updated 2024-11-24 23:10:54) |
scientific name |
Protoneura sanguinipes Westfall, 1987 |
status |
|
Protoneura sanguinipes Westfall, 1987 View in CoL
Figs. 17 View FIGURES17–20 (♂ habitus), 41 (♀ habitus), 63 (♀ mes. plate), 87 (gen. lig.), 113 (♂ app.), 119 (map)
Protoneura sanguinipes Westfall, 1987: 93 View in CoL –97, Figs. 1–4 View FIGURES 1–4 (description of ♂ and ♀, illustrations of ♂ appendages and ♀ mesostigmal plates);— Paulson (2004: 176; listed as range restricted);— Flint et al. (2006: 73; Dominican Republic);— Westfall & May (2006: 431, 433–435, 439, 440, Figs. 225B, 226F; in key to northern representatives of genus, characterization of adults, illustrations of ♂ S10, ♀ pronotum and mesostigmal plates);— Paulson (2009f; IUCN assessment);— Garrison et al. (2010: 379, 381, Figs. 2515, 2517; illustrations ♂ S10, ♀ S8–10);— Meurgey (2013: 300, 306; distribution).
Primary types. Holotype ♂. Arroyo Bermejo, 4 km NNE of Hatillo and Autopista Duarte, Distrito Nacional, Distrito Nacional, 10 viii 1983, R.W. Garrison leg. [ FSCA # 727 View Materials ].
Specimens examined. 19 ♂, 23 ♀: DOMINICAN REPUBLIC : 1 ♂ 1 ♀, A. Busck leg. [ USNM]; Prov. Dajabón : 1 ♂ 2 ♀ (paratypes), Masacre River, Balneario El Salto, Loma de Cabrera {19°25' N, 71°36'51'' W, 252 m}, 20–23 v 1973, D. & M. Davis leg. [ FSCA]; Distrito Nacional GoogleMaps : 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Isabela River, about 2 km E of Berrio (18°39'49'' N, 70°9'28'' W), 10 viii 2001, D.E. Perez-Gelabert leg. [ USNM] GoogleMaps ; 8 ♂ 11 ♀ paratypes (8 pairs in tandem), Arroyo Bermejo, 4 km NNE of Hatillo , Autopista Duarte (18°36'2'' N, 70°6'16'' W, 90 m), 10 viii 1983, R.W. Garrison leg. [RWG] GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂ 1 f # paratypes (in tandem), same data but [ CSCA] GoogleMaps ; 3 ♂ 3 ♀, paratypes (in tandem), same data but [ FSCA] GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂ 1 ♀ paratypes (in tandem), same data but [ UMMZ] GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂ 1 ♀, paratypes (in tandem), same data but [ USNM] GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂ 1 ♀, same data but 6 vi 1989, J.J. Daigle leg. [RWG] GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂ 1 ♀, same data but [ USNM]. GoogleMaps
Characterization. Male: Epicranium and dorsum of thorax dark metallic copper with green reflections, dorsum of S1, distal ring on S2–5, and S6–10 black, remainder orange-brown, with a dorsal orange spot on S9 distal half; pale colors reddish orange and yellow ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES17–20 ). Pronotum black with lateral corner of middle lobe orange red. Mesepisternum and mesepimeron dark metallic copper; metepisternum dark with large yellow spot on ventral half; metepimeron pale yellow with anterodorsal corner black. Coxa and trochanter dark with margins orange; remainder of leg entirely reddish orange; legs and venter of thorax pruinose; tibial spurs shorter than twice intervening spaces. Genital ligula lacking lateral lobes, with a triangularly convex distal margin and laterodistal corners of distal segment not projected ventrally ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 85–91 ). Cercus about as long as S10 length and paraproct, longer than wide in lateral view, with a longitudinal split along dorsal portion of external surface, delimiting a medial sclerotized branch which ends on a broad triangular tip directed medioventrally located at about midlength of cercus ( Fig. 113 View FIGURES 112–114 ); remainder of cercus foliaceous, medially concave, with a small triangular tooth at ventrobasal edge, and a long, curved thick pointed tooth at mediobasal edge directed medioposteriorly. Paraproct about as long as S10 length, narrowing to half its basal width at distal 1/3, and concave medially ( Fig. 113 View FIGURES 112–114 ). TL 37–38.5; Hw 18– 18.5.
Female: As male but dark color black with metallic green to copper reflections, pale areas orange or yellow; pronotum black with margins yellow; legs with coxae, trochanters, and base of outer surface of femora yellow, extensor surface of femora dark brown, remainder of legs pale orange; pale lateral area of S9 extended dorsally medially to about 1/2 of segment height ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 41–44 ). Middle lobe of pronotum lacking pronounced lateral depressions; posterior lobe directed dorsally, trilobed with medial lobe entire and smoothly convex ( Fig. 63a View FIGURES 60–63 ). Mesostigmal plate oval with medial margin elevated and with a shallow central concavity; mesanepisterum with oblique carina arising from posteromedial corner of mesostigmal plate and ending midway to middorsal carina ( Fig. 63b View FIGURES 60–63 ). TL 32.5–36; Hw 17.5–21.
Diagnosis. Male cercus morphology, with a medial sclerotized branch which ends on a tooth directed medioventrally and remainder of cercus foliaceous, medially concave, with a small triangular tooth on outer ventrobasal edge, and a long, curved thick pointed tooth at medial ventrobasal edge directed medially ( Figs. 113 View FIGURES 112–114 ), is shared with P. caligata , P. capillaris , P. dunklei and P. viridis ( Figs. 100 View FIGURES 100–102 ; 102; 106; 117). Within this group, P.
sanguinipes resembles P. dunklei by the medial sclerotized branch of male cercus ending on a broad triangular tip located at about midlength of cercus ( Figs. 106 View FIGURES 106–108 ; 113) and by distal margin of genital ligula triangularly convex with laterodistal corners not projected ventrally ( Figs. 80 View FIGURES 79–84 ; 87); in P. caligata , P. capillaris , and P. viridis the medial branch ends on a tooth directed medioventrally located at cercus tip ( Figs. 100 View FIGURES 100–102 ; 102; 106; 117), and distal margin of genital ligula is straight with laterodistal corners projected ventrally ( Figs. 74 View FIGURES 71–78 ; 76; 93). Protoneura sanguinipes differs from males of all four species by the entirely reddish orange femora, tibiae and tarsi ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES17–20 ), which have various extents of dark colors in the other species ( Figs. 4 View FIGURES 1–4 ; 6; 21). Female can be distinguished from all congeners except P. dunklei by its trilobed posterior lobe of pronotum directed dorsally and with medial lobe entire and smoothly convex ( Fig. 63a View FIGURES 60–63 ) and by the oval mesostigmal plate ( Fig. 63b View FIGURES 60–63 ). It differs from P. dunklei by flexor surface of tibiae pale ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 41–44 ; dark in P. dunklei , Fig. 34 View FIGURES 33–36 ).
Habitat and biology. Females oviposit on sedges near banks while still in tandem with males ( Westfall 1987). Distribution. Dominican Republic ( Fig. 119 View FIGURES 119–120 ). Assessed as Endangered by IUCN ( Paulson 2009f).
Flint, Jr., O. S., Bastardo, R. H. & Perez-Gelabert, D. E. (2006) Distribution of the Odonata of the Dominican Republic. Bulletin of American Odonatology, 9 (3 / 4), 67 - 84.
Garrison, R. W., von Ellenrieder, N. & Louton, J. A. (2010) Damselfly genera of the New World. An Illustrated and Annotated Key to the Zygoptera. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, xiv + 490 pp, + 24 pls.
Meurgey, F. (2013) A catalogue of the West Indian dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata). Annales de la Societe entomologique de France (N. S.): International Journal of Entomology, 49 (3), 298 - 334. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00379271.2013.848066
Paulson, D. R. (2004) Critical species of Odonata in the Neotropics. International Journal of Odonatology, 7 (2), 163 - 188. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 13887890.2004.9748208
Paulson, D. R. (2009 f) Protoneura sanguinipes. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2009: e. T 59765 A 11979824. Available from: www. iucnredlist. org (accessed 26 January 2016)
Westfall, Jr., M. J. (1987) Protoneura sanguinipes spec. nov., a new protoneurid damselfly from the Dominican Republic, West Indies (Zygoptera). Odonatologica, 16 (1), 93 - 97.
Westfall, Jr., M. J. & May, M. L. (2006) Damselflies of North America. Revised edition. Scientific Publishers, Inc., Gainesville, FL, xii + 502 pp.
FIGURES17–20. Male body scan; head in dorsalview, thorax and abdomen in lateral view (not to scale). (17) P.sanguinipes; (18) P.scintilla; (19) P.sulfurata; (20) P. tenuis.
FIGURES 1–4. Male body scan; head in dorsal view, thorax and abdomen in lateral view (not to scale). (1) P. ailsa; (2) P. amatoria; (3) P.aurantiaca; (4) P.caligata.
FIGURES 85–91. Genital ligula in ectal (85–91a), lateral (85–91b), and entolateral (85c) views (to scale).(85) P. rojiza; (86) P. romanae; (87)P.sanguinipes; (88) P.scintilla; (89) P.sulfurata; (90–91) P.tenuis. All by RWG.
FIGURES 112–114. Male caudal appendages in lateral (112–114a), posterodorsal (112–114b), and dorsal (112–114b) views (not to scale). (112) P.romanae; (113) P.sanguinipes; (114) P. scintilla.
FIGURES 41–44. Female body scan; head in dorsal view, thorax and abdomen in lateral view (not to scale). (41) P. sanguinipes; (42) P. scintilla; (43) P. sulfurata; (44) P. tenuis. Insert in Fig. 42: posterior lobe of pronotum in dorsal view; in Fig.43: pterothorax in dorsal view.
FIGURES 60–63. Female pronotum (60b; 63a) and mesostigmal plates (60a, c; 61; 62; 63b), in lateral (60a; 61a) and dorsal (60b, c; 61b; 62; 63) views (to scale). (60) P. peramans; (61) P. rojiza; (62) P. romanae; (63) P. sanguinipes.
FIGURES 100–102. Male caudal appendages in lateral (100–102a), posterodorsal (100–102b), and dorsal (100–102b) views (not to scale). (100) P.caligata; (101) P. calverti; (102) P.capillaris.
FIGURES 106–108. Male caudal appendages in lateral (106–108a), posterodorsal (106–108b), and dorsal (106–108b) views (not to scale). (106) P.dunklei; (107) P. klugi; (108) P. macintyrei.
FIGURES 79–84. Genitalligula in ectal (79–84a), lateral (79–84b), and entolateral (81c; 84c) views (to scale).(79) P.cupida; (80) P.dunklei; (81) P.klugi; (82) P.macintyrei; (83) P.paucinervis; (84) P. peramans. All by RWG.
FIGURES 71–78. Genital ligula inectal (71–78a) and lateral (71–78b) views (to scale). (71) P.ailsa; (72) P.amatoria; (73) P. aurantiaca; (74) P.caligata; (75) P.calverti; (76) P.capillaris; (77) P.cara; (78) P.corculum. All by RWG.
FIGURES 33–36. Female body scan; head in dorsal view, thorax and abdomen in lateral view (not to scale). (33) P. cupida; (34) P.dunklei; (35)P.klugi; (36) P.macintyrei. Insert in Fig.35: thorax in ventral view.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Protoneura sanguinipes Westfall, 1987
Ellenrieder, Natalia Von & Garrison, Rosser W. 2017 |
Protoneura sanguinipes
Garrison 2010: 379 |
Flint 2006: 73 |
Westfall 1987: 93 |
1 (by plazi, 2017-12-01 10:49:54)
2 (by ImsDioSync, 2017-12-01 11:31:28)
3 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-26 02:07:20)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-01-29 19:01:34)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-02-10 01:52:47)
6 (by valdenar, 2022-11-14 16:23:44)
7 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-11-14 16:29:18)
8 (by plazi, 2023-10-28 14:22:14)