Hemibagrus menoda (Hamilton, 1822)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5351788 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CF180962-FFFA-FFA4-FC8B-F7ABFA12877E |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Hemibagrus menoda |
status |
|
HEMIBAGRUS MENODA View in CoL SPECIES GROUP
Artificial key to the members of the H. menoda species group
1. Sides of body with thin black vertical lines and thin midlateral line (Alas River drainage)...................................... H. caveatus View in CoL
– Sides of body with spots arranged in vertical columns..........2
2. Eye diameter 14–16% HL; dorsal to adipose distance 16–19% SL (Cauvery River drainage). .............................. H. punctatus View in CoL
– Eye diameter 11–14% HL; dorsal to adipose distance 10–15% SL.............................................................................................3
3. Snout rounded when viewed from above ( Fig. 12 View Fig ); cleithral process broad, with shallow notch dorsally for about one quarter its maximum width ( Fig. 13a View Fig ); fins grey in life (Brahmaputra, Ganges, Godavari and Mahanadi river drainages). .................. ................................................................................. H. menoda View in CoL
– Snout almost truncate when viewed from above ( Fig. 12 View Fig ); cleithral process narrow, with moderately deep notch dorsally for about one third its maximum width ( Fig. 13b View Fig ); fins reddish in life (Irawaddy and Sittang river drainages).......................... .............................................................................. H. peguensis
Remarks. — The members of the H. menoda species group are morphologically identical to those of the H. nemurus species groups, save for the presence of dark spots or lines on the sides of the body in the former. It is thus likely that both these groups alone are not monophyletic in the absence of the other. Although it is equally logical to combine the species in both H. menoda and H. nemurus species groups into one group, we maintain the distinctiveness of these two groups in order to simplify comparisons with congeners.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |