Rhithrops capensis, Bilton & Shepard, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.6.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EB51F148-8EFC-4B22-9B74-1DBE4EB3A544 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7223892 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C74FFC13-303E-FF9B-FF68-544DDD82FA37 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhithrops capensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rhithrops capensis sp. nov.
( Figs 1–9 View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG )
Type locality. South Africa, Western Cape, Cederberg, Matjies Rivier, Matjiesrivier , 32°31’07.42”S 19°21’00.4”E, 725 m. ( Fig. 9 View FIG ) GoogleMaps .
Type material. Holotype (male): “ 22/ix/2011 South Africa WC// Cederberg , Matjies Rivier // Matjiesrivier 32°31’07.42”S // 19°21’00.4”E, 725 m. D T Bilton leg.” ( AMG). GoogleMaps
Paratypes (23): 5♂, 10♀ same data as holotype GoogleMaps ; 1♀ “ 21/ix/2010 South Africa WC// Cederberg, Matjies Rivier // Matjiesrivier 32°31’07.42”S // 19°21’00.4”E, 725 m. D T Bilton leg.” GoogleMaps ; 2♂, 3♀ “ 22/ix/2011 South Africa WC// Cederberg, Matjies Rivier // Matjiesrivier 32°31’07.42”S // 19°21’00.4”E, 725 m. D T Bilton leg.” GoogleMaps ; 1♂, 1♀ “ South Africa: W. Cape // Cederberg, Maalgat // Matjiesrivier // 28-29 XII 2004 820 m asl // 32°29’40”S 19°16’49”E // P. S. Cranston, leg.” ( AMG, CBP, DMSA, EMEC, NMW) GoogleMaps .
Description: With all the above characters of the genus.
Size: Holotype: BL 4.10 mm; EL 2.65 mm; EW 1.35 mm; PL 0.85 mm; PW 1.20 mm. Paratypes: Males BL 4.40–4.75 mm; EL 2.60–3.00 mm; EW 1.45–1.60 mm; PL 0.85–1.05 mm; PW 1.20–1.35 mm. Females BL 4.65– 4.80 mm; EL 2.75–2.90 mm; EW 1.40–1.60 mm; PL 0.90–1.05 mm; PW 1.25–1.35 mm.
Head: Epicranium densely and shallowly punctate, with short decumbent setae, epicranial suture absent; frontal area twice as wide as one compound eye, antennal ridges absent, frontoclypeal suture straight between antennal bases.
Elytra: Conjointly twice as long as wide, parallel-sided, apices moderately protruding ( Figs 1 View FIG & 6D–E View FIG ).
Legs: Relatively long, elongate, with large, strongly-developed tarsi and claws ( Fig. 8A–C View FIG ).
Male: Last abdominal ventrite with broad, shallow apicomedial emargination ( Fig. 7E View FIG ). Labium with modified, spathulate setae on anteroventral margin ( Fig. 4F View FIG ). Anterior edge of sternite 8 with short median strut ( Fig. 9F View FIG ); sternite 9 as in Fig. 9C View FIG . Tergite 8 with numerous long setae close to posterior margin ( Fig. 9E View FIG ).
Aedeagus: Long and tubular ( Figs 8D–F View FIG & 9A, B & D View FIG ); basal piece:paramere ratio 0.6:0.4. Basal piece hookshaped basally, open on left side. Median lobe long, narrow, acute apically. Parameres parallel-sided, apically a little longer than median lobe, apices rounded on outer side, clasping apex of median lobe ( Fig. 8F View FIG ).
Female: Few external differences to males. The sublateral furrows of the pronotum are deeper and more evident ( Fig. 2B View FIG ). The last abdominal ventrite has a conical apex, somewhat raised centrally and lacks an apicomedian emargination ( Fig. 7F View FIG ). The labium has fewer, shorter modified setae on the anteroventral margin ( Fig. 4E View FIG ). Sternite 8 as in Fig. 10C View FIG .
Ovipositor: Elongate ( Fig. 10A–B View FIG ) and strongly sclerotized; type 1 (sensu Kodada et al. 2016); apically sharp-tipped. Valvifers ventral, asymmetrical, long, thin, forming a V-shaped sclerite. Coxites asymmetrical, laterally compressed, blade-shaped, apex very acute, dorsal side serrate, with basally directed long narrow dorsal extension.
Distribution and habitat. Known only from type locality, the Matjies River ( Fig. 11 View FIG ), a tributary of the Olifants River in the Cederberg, Western Cape Province, South Africa.
Etymology. The trivial name, capensis , refers to location of this species in the Western Cape Province of South Africa.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |