Diaulota submarina, Ahn, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5336.1.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AB4476C8-497F-4CE2-85CA-7434C089B8FE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8276634 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C7295D6B-FFED-0C72-FF39-F8D1FF20F839 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Diaulota submarina |
status |
sp. nov. |
Diaulota submarina sp. nov.
( Figs. 1–4 View FIGUER 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIG View FIG )
Diaulota uenoi: Ahn, 1996: 284 View in CoL ; Frank and Ahn, 2011: 26; Ahn et al., 2017: 306; Park and Lee, 2021: 240 [misidentification].
Description. Small, body length 2.5–2.9 mm. Body more or less narrow but robust, long setae densely pubescent ( Fig. 1 View FIGUER 1 ). Body reddish brown with blackish brown abdominal tergites VI–VII. Head slightly deflexed, 1.2 times as long as wide ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ), sculpture reticulate, about 3 pairs of long filiform setae present on each side, infraorbital carina present ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). Antennomeres 4–5 more or less subquadrate, 6–10 transverse. Eye small, 0.2 times as long as head ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ), minute setae present between facets. Labrum ( Fig. 3A View FIG ) large, semicircular, 12 long and macrosetae and 4–5 short and microsetae present on each side of midline. Mandibles ( Fig. 3B View FIG ) narrow and elongate, more or less symmetrical, small median tooth present. Maxilla ( Fig. 3C View FIG ) with galea and lacinia elongate, almost equal in length; galea corneous, apex and internal surface densely pubescent with long filiform setae; lacinia more or less acute, internal surface with comb of single row of about 8 well separated spines followed by several setae, a distinctive row of several setae present on mesal half of lacinial surface; maxillary palpus with 4 articles, robust, article 3 incrassate distally and longer than article 2, article 4 narrowed distally. Labial palpi ( Fig. 3D View FIG ) with 3 distinct articles, palpomere 1 slightly longer than wide, palpomere 2 narrower than 1 and almost 2.0 times as long as 1, palpomere 3 narrower than 2 and slightly longer than 1; ligula simple and elongate with 2 minute setae; twin pores, median pore, and distal pore indistinctly present; medial setae absent on prementum, real pores and setal pores present, basal pores absent, pseudopores absent in very narrow median area, about 4 pseudopores present on each side; a pair of indistinct comb-like hypoglossae present. Mentum ( Fig. 3D View FIG ) without v setae, anterior margin shallowly emarginate, several setae present, many punctures present. Submentum with numerous punctures and setae. Neck absent. Pronotum 0.9 times as long as wide, narrowest at base and widest near one third, basal margin almost straight but slightly prolonged posteriorly on median region, apical margin slightly prolonged anteriorly; long setae subparallel, uniformly distributed and apical half directed anteriorly, basal half directed posteriorly in a narrow median strip, others curve correspondingly; about 3 pairs of long filiform setae present, 1 on disc, 1 on lateral margin, and 1 on apico-lateral margin. Hypomeron entirely visible in lateral aspect, with longitudinal carina. Scutellum more or less diamond-shaped. Elytron 1.2 times as long as wide; 0.7 times as long as pronotum; long setae uniformly distributed and directed posteriorly; about 2 pairs of long filiform setae present, 1 on disc and 1 on lateral margin. Hind wings absent. Mesocoxal cavities contiguous; mesoventral process short and pointed ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). Metaventrite shorter than width of mesocoxa, expanded apico-basally ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). Metendosternite Y-shaped ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). Tibiae with two thick setae on hind margin. Tarsal formula 4-4-4, tarsus with long setae but spatulate seta absent. Claws narrow, long, sickle-shaped. Abdomen gradually broadening to rounded apex; relatively long numerous setae uniformly distributed, directed posteriorly. Tergites III–VI strongly impressed at base. Sternites not impressed at base. Male sternite VIII ( Fig. 4A View FIG ) prolonged posteriorly as broad triangular projection but female unmodified. Male tergite X slightly truncated at posterior margin ( Fig. 4B View FIG ). Female tergite X rounded at posterior margin ( Fig. 4C View FIG ). Median lobe with complex internal sclerites ( Fig. 4D View FIG ). Paramere ( Fig. 4E View FIG ). Spermatheca ( Fig. 4F View FIG ).
Specimens Examined. Holotype: 1♁ ( CNUIC), with labels as follows: “ KOREA: Chungnam: Anmyeon Isl., Bangpo Beach , 8 VI 1994, K. J. Ahn, ex rocks in low tide | Holotype Diaulota submarina Ahn, 2023 ” . Paratypes: 7 exx. (4 on slides), same data as holotype; 15 exx., KOREA: Chungnam Prov., Muchangpo , 28 III 1998, K.-J. Ahn, ex inside empty barnacles in low tide . Other specimens: 13 exx. (alcohol collection), Chungnam: Anmyeon Isl., Bangpo Beach , 7 VI 1994, K. J. Ahn, ex rocks in low tide; 10 exx. (alcohol collection, 1 on slide), Jeju Prov., Udomyeon , Yeonpyeong-ri , Udo island , 1 III 2007, KJ Ahn; 1 ex., Gyengnam Prov. , Geoje City, Gabae-ri, 1 VII 2000, K.-J. Ahn, H.-J. Kim M.-J. Jeon, ex barnacles .
Distribution. Korea (South).
Etymology. The adjective submarina refers to the microhabitat of the species.
Remarks. There is sexual dimorphism in size (bigger in male) and shape of head (broadening anteriorly in male but more or less parallel in female) in this new species as other Diaulota species ( Fig. 1A View FIGUER 1 ).
This species is similar to D. uenoi and almost indistinguishable by the external morphological characters (see key couplet below). However, it is different from the latter in mouthparts and the external shape and internal structure of the median lobe. Apical process of D. uenoi is broader and more abruptly bent upward (fig. 10L in Sawada, 1971) compared to the new species, narrower and slightly bent upward ( Fig. 4D View FIG ; fig. 40 in Ahn, 1996). Especially, the form of internal sclerites of median lobe are different: apical one larger and polygonal in D. submarina ( Fig. 4D View FIG ; fig. 40 in Ahn, 1996) but smaller and rounded in D. uenoi (fig. 10L in Sawada, 1971). They can be regarded as cryptic species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Aleocharinae |
Genus |
Diaulota submarina
Ahn, Kee-Jeong 2023 |
Diaulota uenoi: Ahn, 1996: 284
Park, J. K. & Lee, J. E. 2021: 240 |
Ahn, K. - J. & Cho, Y. - B. & Kim, Y. - H. & Yoo, I. - S. & Newton, A. F. 2017: 306 |
Frank, J. H. & Ahn, K. - J. 2011: 26 |
Ahn, K. - J. 1996: 284 |