Polyxenus lankaranensis, Short & Vahtera & Wesener & Golovatch, 2020

Short, Megan, Vahtera, Varpu, Wesener, Thomas & Golovatch, Sergei I., 2020, The millipede family Polyxenidae (Diplopoda, Polyxenida) in the faunas of the Crimean Peninsula and Caucasus, with notes on other European Polyxenidae, Zootaxa 4772 (2), pp. 306-332 : 322-325

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4772.2.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A8BA1B31-0239-4C3D-B886-15C39BC3EBC9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3818656

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C62A8794-E70F-FFC9-FF77-1E5FFC2C9873

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Polyxenus lankaranensis
status

sp. nov.

Polyxenus lankaranensis View in CoL new species

Figs 6 View FIGURE 6 , 7 View FIGURE 7 ; Map Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 .

Material examined: Holotype adult female ( VNR 018346-1 ), Azerbaijan, Lankaran seher, Lankaran, N38º47’22”, E48º51’08”, street trees under the bark, 25 Mar. 2015, leg. H. Reip, D. Antić, F. Walther. Specimen mounted on slide, deposited in SMNG GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 1 adult female ( VNR 018347-1 ) , 1 subadult male ( VNR 018347-2 ) both mounted on slides , 4 subadult stadium VII and 2 stadium VI in ethanol ( VNR 018347-3 ), all same location as holotype, deposited in SMNG GoogleMaps ; 1 female, ZFMK MYR 6089 ( ZFMK-TIS 2553423 ), same location as holotype, genetic voucher GoogleMaps . Other material: Russia, 1 adult male mounted on side, 1 immature stadium VI , Dagestan, Buynaksk , N42º49’, E47º07’, moss under bush, 8 May 1983, leg. D. Krivolutsky ( ZMUM) GoogleMaps .

Etymology: adjective, named after the town where it was first discovered.

Diagnosis: Very similar morphology to Polyxenus lagurus , differing in size and colouration, especially when freshly collected. Body length of adults less than 2 mm, white in colour except for the trichomes that varied from black (anterior vertex) to pale brown (all remaining trichomes including those of caudal bundle). Medial anterior vertex trichomes shorter and more bulbous with shorter serrations than those of P. lagurus ( Fig. 6I View FIGURE 6 ). COI sequencing shows separation into a distinct clade from P. lagurus . Differing from P. lapidicola / P. macedonicus in only having two posterior medial vertex trichomes, 6 th antennal article twice the length of 7 th article, pleural trichomes with serrations proximally, a differing arrangement and number of trichomes on the collum and lacking globular anterior tergal trichomes. The width to length ratio of the medial trichomes of tergite 4 is 0.3–0.4 in P. lankaranensis sp. n., while it is 0.5–0. 6 in P. macedonicus .

Description: Measurements: Body length after mounting on slides holotype 1.6 mm, width at widest point on body 0.5 mm, caudal bundle 0.3 mm. Paratypes: adult female 1.8 mm, width 0.6 mm, caudal bundle 0.7 mm; subadult male 1.5 mm, width 0.5 mm, no caudal bundle present. Specimens had been preserved in 80 -100% ethanol.

Head ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ): Six ommatidia on each side of which one antero-ventral. Vertex with one pair of posterior tufts of 20+21 (holotype) 20+20 (female adult paratype) and 19+17 (subadult male paratype) trichomes arranged in two rows ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ); the distance between each tuft is about a fifth their length. A narrow gap only to anterior vertex trichome patches. Anterior vertex trichomes medially short and slightly bulbous (35–39 µm) with small serrations (in contrast to those of P. lagurus which larger, 90–120 µm, and with more feathered larger serrations) ( Fig. 6I View FIGURE 6 ), gradually becoming more elongate laterally. Three trichobothria arranged in an isosceles triangle with the most internal (immediately adjacent posterior tufts of vertex) much smaller than the other 2 ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ). Gnathochilarium with lateral palp 2.5 times medial palp, with 12 long sensilla, 17 sensilla on medial palp. Clypeo-labrum with nine setae along posterior margin, seven lamellar plates each side along anterior edge, three rows large papillae anteriorly with remaining labrum covered in papillae gradually reducing in size towards the posterior of the labrum ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE 7 ). Antennae: proportions of antennal articles as in Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 with 7 th article 2/3–3/4 the length of 6 th article. Details of sensilla based on holotype and adult female paratype. Antennal article VI with 1 thick basiconic sensillum, 6–7 thin basiconic sensilla with 1–2 thin anterior to the single thick sensillum and 5–6 arranged in a crescent to the posterior, one posterior coeloconic sensillum. ( Figs 6B View FIGURE 6 , 7E View FIGURE 7 ); antennal article VII with two thick basiconic sensilla to posterior of 4-6 thin basiconic sensilla arranged in an arc curving distally, one setifom sensillum between the two posterior basiconic sensilla and one posterior coeloconic sensillum ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 , 7E View FIGURE 7 ).

Trunk: Collum with almost symmetrical arrangement of 56 (holotype), 48 (subadult male paratype) barbate trichomes with lateral rosettes of barbate trichomes and three trichomes internally either side. Trichomes forming a single continuous row anteriorly and posteriorly ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ). Lateral protuberances of collum with 4–6 barbate trichomes. Remaining tergites with two even posterior rows of trichomes. Tergite 2 with 65 trichomes (adult), 44 (subadult male). Trichomes are barbate with posterior row 1/3 longer, anterior row varying in size with medial trichomes shortest (30–40 μm) (6E–G, 7A). The trichomes of the lateral tufts are longer, barbate with serrations to base. Legs ( Fig. 6J View FIGURE 6 ): naming of leg segments is after Manton (1956). Legs 1 and 2 without trochanter, leg 1 also lacks tarsus 1. Trochanter, post-femur and tarsus 1 lack setae. Coxae I with one seta and coxae II with three setae; all other coxae without seta. Prefemora and femora with one seta; these large biarticulate setae having an elongate funicle furnished with a long acute process at apex (7C), single tiny elongate seta on distal edge of each tibia. Tarsus II spine ( Fig. 6J View FIGURE 6 ) longer than telotarsus (ratio 1.2:1). Telotarsus bearing an anterior process with a spinous projection longer than claw, a single large latero–posterior process associated with the claw and posterior lamellar process longer than the claw (7F). Coxal glands in males on leg pairs 8 and 9.

Telson: Medial cluster of 37 (holotype), 25 (subadult male paratype) dorso-medial (ornamental) trichomes with insertion points forming a ventrally pointing triangular shape, with a medial gap ( Fig. 6K View FIGURE 6 ), dorsal to two bundles of caudal trichomes positioned laterally. Ornamental trichomes darkly pigmented, barbate, varying in length, and straight forming a fan-like shape typical of the subfamily Polyxeninae (the genera Propolyxenus , Polyxenus , Typhloxenus ). Longest ornamental trichomes to tip of caudal bundle, hooked trichomes with three or four hooks.

Remarks: Initially the collected specimens of P. lankaranensis sp. n. were examined and identified as a population of very small P. lagurus . The specimens shared most characters except for the tiny size and lower number of trichomes, as well as shorter and more bulbous anterior vertex trichomes. The tiny polyxenids also lacked cuticular pigment and were white in colour except for the trichomes. Genetic analysis confirmed the distinctness of this species. Due to their size, this species is no doubt being under-collected. There are two very similar small Polyxenus species already described: Polyxenus lapidicola Silvestri, 1903 , and Polyxenus macedonicus Verhoeff, 1952 . The former species, collected near Portici, Italy was no more than 2 mm in length, and incompletely described. In describing P. macedonicus, Verhoeff (1952) compared the two species and size was not mentioned, so one must assume this was not a point of difference and later literature, in which specimens initially identified as P. lapidicola were reassigned to P. macedonicus , makes no mention of any size differences ( Condé 1953). It is unfortunate that the types appear to be lost (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin pers. comm.) as it is possible the figures ( Silvestri 1903), from which the diagnostic differences have been determined, are misleading. Condé (1953) commented that the shape of the trichomes illustrated in the description of the species ( Silvestri 1903, Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ) is unlikely to be correct and does not agree with the shape of trichomes in figure 2 ( Silvestri 1903). However, it should be noted that trichome shape is often not a good diagnostic character on its own as even in Polyxenus lagurus some trichomes in anterior rows of tergal trichomes can be distinctly globular ( Humbert 1893, plate XII).

SMNG

Senckenberg Museum fuer Naturkunde Goerlitz

VI

Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute

ZFMK

Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig

ZMUM

Zoological Museum, University of Amoy

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Diplopoda

Order

Polyxenida

Family

Polyxenidae

Genus

Polyxenus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF