Incertosulcus afoveatus, Wang & He & Chen, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.960.2679 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D1577FA1-1E52-4A2F-A1BE-7A40C46E178F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13983215 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7E226425-0DEA-43DE-A965-1663A167B2B1 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:7E226425-0DEA-43DE-A965-1663A167B2B1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Incertosulcus afoveatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Incertosulcus afoveatus sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7E226425-0DEA-43DE-A965-1663A167B2B1
Fig. 8 View Fig
Diagnosis
This new species can be recognized by having the antennal setae longer than the width of the flagellomeres; median pronotal sulcus present and foveolate; median mesonotal sulcus absent, at most with a long fovea near the posterior margin; PPP short, basal width nearly equal to its length; the hypopygium longer than wide, with the posterior branches short ( Fig. 8G View Fig ); genitalia with dorsal harpe filamentary, and narrower than ventral harpe.
This species is similar to I. exilisulcus sp. nov. by sharing the simple aedeagus without a sickle-shaped process apically. However, I. afoveatus sp. nov. can be distinguished by having the mesoscutum and mesoscutellum not foveolate (more or less foveolate in I. exilisulcus ); the mesoscutellum without a medio-longitudinal suture (present in I. exilisulcus ); the basal width of PPP nearly equal to its length (two-thirds of length in I. exilisulcus ); T2 with sparse punctures (denser in I. exilisulcus ).
Etymology
The specific epithet ‘ afoveatus ’ is a combination of the Latin words ‘ a ’ (for ‘without’) and ‘ foveatus ’ and refers to the absence of foveae on the mesoscutum and mesoscutellum.
Material examined
Holotype
CHINA – Fujian • ♂; Minqing, Xiongjiang Town; 13–17 Jul. 2005; Zaifu Xu leg.; ZJUH 200609178 .
Paratype (1 ♂)
CHINA – Hainan • 1 ♂; Bawangling ; 7–11 Jul. 2006; Liqiong Weng leg.; ZJUH 200700151 .
Description
Male
MEASUREMENTS (n = 2). WF 1.78–1.83 × LE; LE 0.99–1.05 × DEV; POL 1.27–1.55 × AOL; OOL 0.87– 0.92 × WOT; DPV 1.51–1.56 × DAO; length of hypopygium 1.41–1.53 × its width; length of posterior branches of hypopygium 0.18–0.19× length of hypopygium.
COLOURATION. Black, metasoma mainly brown, T3 yellowish brown. Mandible yellowish brown; maxillary and labial palpi brown. Antenna brown, scape dark brown. Legs brown, trochanters, femora apically, tibiae apically, and tarsi yellowish brown. Fore wing hyaline; veins and pterostigma pale yellowish brown.
PUBESCENCE.Body with short sparse setae.Antenna with erect setae, nearly equal to width of flagellomere ( Fig. 8B View Fig ). Eye with sparse short setae, nearly 3.0× diameter of an ommatidium. Wings with short, dense brown setae. T1 nearly glabrous; T2 with sparse setae laterally.
HEAD. Slightly shorter than wide, LH 0.98 × WH. Mandible with three apical teeth, ventralmost one largest. Clypeus trilobite; medio-clypeal lobe with apical margin acute medially; medio-clypeal carina present, not extending into frons, arched in lateral view. Antenna thin, flagellomeres cylindrical. Frons coriaceous and densely foveolate, frontal line weak ( Fig. 8A View Fig ); WF 1.83 × LE. Eye small, LE 0.35 × LH; contour of eye distinctly protruding in antero-dorsal view ( Fig. 8A View Fig ); LE 0.99 × DEV. Anterior ocellus partly anterior to imaginary top line of eyes in antero-dorsal view; POL 1.27 × AOL, OOL 0.87 × WOT, DPV 1.51 × DAO. Vertex coriaceous and densely foveolate, sides of head behind eyes distinctly converging posteriorly ( Fig. 8A View Fig ). Occipital carina present, vertex crest nearly straight.
MESOSOMA. Dorsal pronotal area coriaceous and densely foveolate, median length 0.33 × width of posterior pronotal margin, anterolateral corner rounded; median pronotal sulcus foveolate; lateral pronotal area obliquely striate; cervical pronotal area coarse ( Fig. 8C View Fig ). Mesoscutum coriaceous and sparsely foveolate; median mesonotal sulcus absent; notauli complete and converging posteriorly ( Fig. 8C View Fig ); parapsidal signum shallow and absent near anterior margin; lateral area of mesoscutum depressed anteriorly ( Fig. 8C View Fig ). Mesoscutellum weakly coriaceous with shallow punctures; mesoscutum-mesoscutellar sulcus present, laterally dilated ( Fig. 8C View Fig ). Dorsal surface of MPC elevated; median length of dorsal surface of MPC equal to its half-width ( Fig. 8D View Fig ); metapostnotum strongly areolate, metapostnotal median carina complete, slightly tortuous ( Fig. 8D View Fig ); metapostnotal-propodeal carina complete, slightly oblique anteriorly and converging posteriorly; dorsal propodeal area densely striate; paraspiracular carinae of MPC complete; lateral marginal carina of MPC complete and protruding ( Fig. 8D View Fig ); PPP short, 0.1× median length of dorsal surface of MPC, apex acute and bent upward in lateral view; transverse posterior carina of MPC complete; propodeal declivity coriaceous, areolate near transverse posterior carina, median and lateral carinae complete; lateral surface of MPC sparsely striate, areolate near submarginal carina of the MPC. Propleuron coriaceous. Mesopleuron coriaceous, densely and shallowly foveolate; subalar impression present; posterior oblique sulcus of mesopleuron present and foveolate.
WINGS. Fore wing with 2r-rs&Rs 2 v slightly curved apically ( Fig. 8F View Fig ); posterior margin of pterostigma nearly straight, prestigma absent; Cu 2 v absent. Hind wing with three distal hamuli.
METASOMA. Metasomal terga shiny with punctures; T1 with sparse punctures, medio-longitudinal sulcus present on anterior third of T1; T2 with sparse punctures, weakly coriaceous basally ( Fig. 8E View Fig ). Metasomal sterna shiny with variably sized punctures; S1 coriaceous. Length of hypopygium 1.4× its width; anterior stalk with anterior margin straight ( Fig. 8G View Fig ); posterior margin bilobate ( Fig. 8G View Fig ), posterior branches broad and short with long setae, 0.2 × length of hypopygium.
MALE GENITALIA. Harpe bilobate, dorsal harpe filamentary and straight ( Fig. 8H View Fig ); ventral harpe distinctly broader than dorsal harpe and with long setae apically ( Fig. 8I View Fig ). Cuspis bilobate with long setae; digitus bent and papillate apically, with setae basally; aedeagus bottle-shaped with apical margin rounded ( Fig. 8H View Fig ).
Female
Unknown.
Distribution
China (Fujian, Hainan) ( Fig. 20 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Chrysidoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Mesitiinae |
Genus |