Drymusa aculicaput (Wunderlich, 2004) new combination
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.80.e86008 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:09338026-092F-42FB-8E2F-00DD6B868D49 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C53376FF-CED6-59C0-817D-78BC31CBAB26 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Drymusa aculicaput (Wunderlich, 2004) new combination |
status |
|
5.2.1. Drymusa aculicaput (Wunderlich, 2004) new combination
Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5
Loxosceles aculicaput Wunderlich, 2004: 703, fig. 10b-d, photo 36.
Type material.
Holotype adult male in Dominican amber, deposited in SMNG 07/36287-422, labeled F933/DB/AR/LOX/CJW, examined. No other specimens are known.
Preservation.
The spider is completely and well-preserved in an orange piece of amber. The abdomen is slightly shrunken and shriveled but no other structures are obviously deformed. The amber piece has large fissures in the portion ventral to the spider. The piece has been embedded in artificial resin. There are no syninclusions other than some pieces of unidentifiable plants and detritus.
Diagnosis.
Drymusa aculicaput comb. nov. can be distinguished from other scytodoids preserved in Dominican amber, as well as from extant congeners, by the palp with short, incrassate tibia and by the bulb with a thin, straight, needle-like embolus (Fig. 5E, G, H, J View Figure 5 ).
Description.
Male holotype (SMNG 07/36287-422). Structure: Carapace longer than wide, narrowed and more hirsute in the cephalic region. Six eyes in three dyads separated by 2-3 diameters (Fig. 4D View Figure 4 ). Chelicera with basal article robust (Figs 3G View Figure 3 , 4D View Figure 4 ); cheliceral lamina present, with broad, triangular apex; at least one promarginal tooth present. Endites not converging in front of labium; anterior margin of labium notched (Fig. 4C View Figure 4 ). Sternum slightly longer than wider. Legs long and thin (Figs 3A View Figure 3 , 4A View Figure 4 ) with a few macrosetae on the prolateral face of the first femur (Fig. 3C View Figure 3 ) and on the ventral faces of all tibiae and metatarsi. Well-developed podotarsite; third claw present (Fig. 3F View Figure 3 ). Spinnerets in a compact group (Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ); colulus broad (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ); ALS short and broad, barely longer than PLS (Figs 4D View Figure 4 , 5C View Figure 5 ). Palps (Fig. 5D-J View Figure 5 ): tibia shorter than femur, incrassate; cymbium short with a small apical extension; bulb with globose, rounded base and thin, straight, needle-shaped embolus. - Measurements [mm]: Total length (excluding chelicerae and spinnerets) 2.34. Carapace length 1.15, width 0.89. Abdomen length 1.27, width 0.66. Palpal femur length 0.52. Palpal tibia length 0.24, height 0.21. Leg I: femur 2.87, patella 0.27, tibia 3.05, metatarsus 0.91, tarsus 2.25. Leg II: femur 2.74, patella 0.38, tibia 2.67, metatarsus 3.65, tarsus 0.66. Leg III: femur 2.13, patella 0.27, tibia 1.88, metatarsus 1.95, tarsus 0.72. Leg IV: femur 2.58, patella 0.33, tibia 2.67, metatarsus 2.55, tarsus 0.72.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Drymusa aculicaput (Wunderlich, 2004) new combination
Magalhaes, Ivan L. F., Perez-Gonzalez, Abel, Labarque, Facundo M., Carboni, Martin, Hammel, Joerg U., Kunz, Robin, Ramirez, Martin J. & Solorzano-Kraemer, Monica M. 2022 |
Loxosceles aculicaput
Wunderlich 2004 |